😭🌹
😱3👎2custom 52224002301330817142

Channel
@kowalewskiA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,388subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001491752872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kowalewskiA |
| Description | Contact/Cooperation — @kwlwski |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kowalewskiA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 1,388 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 1,388 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
189 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 58 | 30.7% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 28.0% | |
| custom 5222400230133081714 | 25 | 13.2% | |
| 😱 | 25 | 13.2% | |
| 😍 | 20 | 10.6% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 4.23% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2024 to 10 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kowalewskiA. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2024 to 10 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😭🌹
😱3👎2custom 52224002301330817142
🔥Microsoft złożył wniosek do SEC w którym ogłosił, że firma planuje “ocenić inwestycje w Bitcoin” na zebraniu akcjonariuszy 10 grudnia.
👍11🔥4custom 52224002301330817142
Insider zdumpował mema SHAR o 96% 🔪 Wieloryb-insider zgromadził 66% podaży SHAR na 104 portfelach i sprzedał wszystko naraz, zarabiając $2,4 mln. Inny duży gracz stracił $429k. Kasyno zawsze wygrywa 😇 ✈ Kowalewski. Dołącz l 🟥YouTube l 🐦Twitter
👍6👎3🔥3
Bitcoinowy wieloryb obudził się po 14 latach bezczynności Nieznany bitcoinowy wieloryb, który kupił $BTC po cenie $1,04, wysłał 1 BTC na inny adres. Nie dokonywał żadnych transakcji przez 13 lat i siedem miesięcy. Użytkownik otrzymał 121 BTC 15 lutego 2011 roku. Wówczas aktywa były warte $126. ✈ Kowalewski. Dołącz l 🟥YouTube l 🐦Twitter
😱7🔥5👍4😍3
USDT – “najlepszy przyjaciel” USA 🤑 CEO Tether, Paolo Ardoino, oświadczył: „Uważam, że Tether jest najlepszym przyjacielem rządu USA, ponieważ posiadamy więcej amerykańskich obligacji skarbowych niż Niemcy, znacznie więcej niż jakikolwiek inny konkurent lub jakakolwiek inna instytucja finansowa na świecie.” Ardoino opowiedział o “przyjaźni” z USA po informacjach o możliwym usunięciu USDT w Europie z giełdy Coinbas…
👍4🔥1
Kto stworzył bitcoina?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😍5custom 52224002301330817144👎3👍2🔥2😱2
🎉 Ojciec bitcoina odnaleziony 9 października ukaże się film dokumentalny Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery wyprodukowany przez HBO, w którym według Politico ujawniona zostanie tożsamość Satoshiego Nakamoto. ✈ Kowalewski. Dołącz l 🟥YouTube l 🐦Twitter
🔥4👍2custom 52224002301330817142
Inwestycja roku: Twitter stracił 79% wartości po zakupie przez Elona Muska 🔽 Fidelity oszacowała, że obecna wartość rynkowa X wynosi 9,4 miliarda dolarów, podczas gdy Musk kupił firmę za 44 miliardy dolarów. Za to Elon zyskał swobodę twórczą i nikt go nie zablokuje Kowalewski. Dołącz l 🟥YouTube l 🐦Twitter
🔥9😱4😍2👍1
Wrzesień był najbardziej zielonym wrześniem w historii kryptowalut: — BTC wzrósł o 7,3% — ETH wzrósł o 3,6% Czekamy na Uptober? Swoją drogą, w całej historii kryptowalut październik tylko dwa razy zamknął się na minusie 😎 ✈ Kowalewski. Dołącz l 🟥YouTube l 🐦Twitter
👍4🔥3😍1😱1custom 52224002301330817141
5-6 września odbędzie się konferencja crypto w Warszawie – ETHWarsaw 2024 Jeśli planujesz wziąć udział, warto zapoznać się z listą side eventów organizowanych przez projekty i uczestników konferencji. To właśnie na takich mniejszych spotkaniach najczęściej udaje się nawiązać kontakty lub po prostu miło spędzić czas. W ramach Warsaw Blockchain Week organizowany jest event ICP STARTUP LAB. 📍 Samo Centrum Wszechświat…
👍4🔥1😍1custom 52224002301330817141
Pavel Durov zwolniony za kaucją 5 milionów euro ✈️ Kowalewski. Dołącz l 🟥YouTube l 🐦Twitter
😍7🔥4👍1custom 52224002301330817141
🔄 UPDATE Zwolniony z aresztu, ale wstępne przesłuchanie i postawienie zarzutów jeszcze przed nim. ✈️ Kowalewski. Dołącz l 🟥YouTube l 🐦Twitter
🔥8custom 52224002301330817141
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kowalewskiA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Kto stworzył bitcoina?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2024 to 10 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kowalewski - bitcoin, kryptowaluty” (@kowalewskiA), 1,388 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kowalewskiA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.