Według szacunków lewarowane ETF miały wczoraj rebalans na poziomie ponad 50 mld usd. Rynek zna ten mechanizm, wyprzedaje przed rebalansem, spycha cenę niżej i wymusza w ten sposób jeszcze większą sprzedaż ze strony lewarowanych ETF. Po tak dużym rebalancie dość często następuje chociaż chwilowe odbicie. Piotr Popławski Edit:: Oczywiście mówimy o rynku tradycyjnym

Channel
Jarzom₿ek - OGŁOSZENIA
@jarzombek
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,859subscribers
-462 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001448033873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jarzombek |
| Description | Praktyczna wiedza na temat rynku kryptowalut przekazana w prosty, zrozumiały sposób. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jarzombek |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:46 | 19,859 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:08 | 19,863 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:59 | 19,866 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:58 | 19,868 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:51 | 19,871 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:04 | 19,879 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:30 | 19,881 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:29 | 19,885 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 19,891 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:07 | 19,896 | -14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 19,910 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 19,916 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 19,922 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:36 | 19,925 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 19,934 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:39 | 19,937 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 19,940 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 19,947 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 19,957 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 19,960 | first reading |
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 31.9%
- avg views ÷ 19,859 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,340
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (2 June 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 145,740 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 03:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 645
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 512
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (26.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Na rynkach tradycyjnych sytuacja taka jak dzisiejsza jest niebezpieczna przede wszystkim ze względu na tempo spadków. Gwałtowny ruch może uruchomić margin calle i przymusowe zamykanie pozycji, napędzając kolejną falę wyprzedaży. Dlatego na rynku tradycyjnym wprowadzono wstrzymanie handlu po spadkach przekraczających określone poziomy. Piotr Popławski
CFTC zatwierdza dopuszczenie do obrotu w USA kontraktów bezterminowych (perpetuals) na amerykańskie akcje
Trump przygląda się, czy hack na giełdę Binance był związany z Koreą Północną (Bloomberg).
Właśnie opublikowaliśmy nowy film na YouTube. Omówiłem w nim całą sytuację z hakiem Binance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTtRcXCeAE
Jeżeli masz już konto i chcesz się zapisać pod nas, aby otrzymywać aktualizacje i mieć dostęp do webinarów w sytuacjach kryzysowych, to możesz uzupełnić formularz tutaj: https://forms.gle/FCH6MGf8CdQdHBaJ9
Jeżeli chcesz nauczyć się mądrze zarządzać kapitałem, to zapraszamy na raporty specjalne. https://kamiljarzombek.pl/raporty-specjalne (strona w wersji beta).
W tradingu bardzo ważne jest zarządzanie ryzykiem - dlatego od razu po sytuacji związanej z hackiem przedstawiliśmy Wam, w jaki sposób zabieczyliśmy pozycję long, tj. poprzez short altów, które były wypłacane z giełdy. Na webinarze mówiliśmy o zakupie opcji PUT, które są zabezpieczeniem na wypadek spadku ceny BTC. Z jednej strony można powiedzieć, że to sytuacja niespodziewana i nikt nie mógł tego przewidzieć i to j…
Jeżeli ktoś nie jest zapisany, to można to zrobić tutaj: https://kamiljarzombek.pl/raporty-specjalne (strona w wersji beta).
Za 5 minut startujemy z webinarem na raportach specjalnych. Za chwilę otrzymacie email.
Kolejne 200m$ w tether skradzione z binance: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x55ba4dabc41b468e580751373ad31acdee6f5ba398682df2c93e5a8340870556 Moje zabezpieczenie pozycji obecnie to short bnb, short uni, short eth (short ethena zamkniety).
Całościowy hack szacowany na 5,6 mld $. 3,5mld$ w ETH, 1,4 mld $ w BTC. Źródło: BWEnews
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @jarzombek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@BittenInsides · 2,784#1
@kyudoads · 1,992#2
@WeAreCryptoOfficial · 4,885#3
@kryptolfg · 6,117#4
@HODLerkaOfficial · 2,509#5
@CryptoPodrozeInfo · 7,171#6
@kowalewskiA · 1,365#7
@cashifycrypto · 2,007#8
@swiatkryptoo · 23,799#9
@rarecryptosignals · 35,000#10
@kdpwiadomosci · 46,032#11
@IT_Tech_Crypto · 2,603#12
@kamiltradingpl · 4,765#13
@maximus_tier1 · 6,398#14
@bitcavepl · 9,977#15
@metaversepopolsku · 2,030#16
@zyjlepiejzkrypto · 2,430#17
@unicorn_sylwia · 771#18
@ligabtc · 536#19
@cryptopigulka · 1,066#20
@moonshilla1 · 552#21
@poczciwytradersignals · 4,479#22
@cryptoquant_pl · 499#23
@centrumkryptowalut · 7,473#24
@KuCoinPoland_News · 1,386#25
@tradergrouppl · 2,483#26
@staxcrypto · 1,564#27
@zywiecrypto_ogloszenia · 3,327#28
@polskidegenofficial · 18,841#29
@Powiadomienia_321Crypto · 27,028#30
@patrykosteam · 1,838#31
@airdrop_santos · 761#32
@hajsoholicy · 6,884#33
@popek1990crypto · 2,886#34
@OlimpioAlpha · 17,223#35
@CoinInsiderPL · 781#36
@BOBBTCSIGNALS · 6,560#37
@Olej_w_Glowie · 8,184#38
@NFT_Powiadomienia · 2,102#39
@noodlestrade · 6,234#40
@klikamyairdropyinfo · 480#41
@TonPolandNews · 1,368#42
@diamondmindtradingfree · 7,276#43
@Airdropypromocje · 961#44
@swiatinformacji · 5,694#45
@rango_info · 2,691#46
@chainedgealpha · 1,554#47
@cryptogoodreads · 19,888#48
@dexlaboratorytgjournal · 1,912#49
@dogs · 6,451,094#50
@gameswift_announcements · 14,094#51
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,250#52
@coinbaseappstore · 15,217#53
@WatcherGuru · 632,041#54
@VenusQueen2 · 4,223#55
@edwardmorra_btc · 6,514#56
@KazisGemFarm · 7,568#57
@mandyscryptoresearch · 8,515#58
@queadyshares · 202#59
@PowsGemCalls · 111,145#60
@alphahunterTanaka · 5,646#61
@TreeNewsFeed · 35,483#62
@CosimaResearch · 1,122#63
@CorleoneAlpha · 6,638#64
@robohero_news · 1,214#65
@DegenKaduna · 9,448#66
@thecallmaster · 1,201#67
@alphabyaizen · 3,901#68
@gateway_io · 2,680#69
@ico_analytic · 55,903#70
@ventureUnicorn1 · 1,458#71
@hatoriinvestments · 8,763#72
@Noodles_calls · 11,493#73
@tokencreations · 3,071#74
@Chad_Crypto · 15,721#75
@cryptonarratives1 · 21,652#76
@platasjungle · 2,034#77
@go2nft_news · 371#78
@investigations · 111,611#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rarecryptosignals · 35,000
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
@kdpwiadomosci · 46,032
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
@swiatkryptoo · 23,799
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
@Powiadomienia_321Crypto · 27,028
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
@polskidegenofficial · 18,841
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 October 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jarzom₿ek - OGŁOSZENIA” (@jarzombek), 19,859 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jarzombek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.