Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net +252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,665–12,035 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 13:19
11,981
-11
15 Sept 2026, 11:01
11,992
+80
13 Sept 2026, 18:17
11,912
-10
11 Sept 2026, 23:39
11,922
-13
9 Sept 2026, 12:20
11,935
-11
6 Sept 2026, 06:42
11,946
-6
3 Sept 2026, 23:16
11,952
-9
2 Sept 2026, 13:26
11,961
+1
1 Sept 2026, 15:53
11,960
+4
31 Aug 2026, 12:38
11,956
-7
30 Aug 2026, 10:24
11,963
-1
29 Aug 2026, 08:42
11,964
+14
27 Aug 2026, 10:06
11,950
-5
26 Aug 2026, 07:53
11,955
+7
25 Aug 2026, 07:32
11,948
+80
24 Aug 2026, 09:52
11,868
+150
22 Aug 2026, 17:37
11,718
+10
21 Aug 2026, 07:26
11,708
-8
20 Aug 2026, 10:32
11,716
+1
18 Aug 2026, 09:12
11,715
first reading
Engagement
492 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.11%
avg views ÷ 11,981 subscribers
Avg views / post
493
263 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
264
of 492 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 170 of 263 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
492 (7 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
129,621
Reactions total
1,114
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
33m 32s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 130 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,703 reactions across 276 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
387
22.7%
❤
291
17.1%
🙏
200
11.7%
👍
173
10.2%
😱
93
5.46%
👎
78
4.58%
🔥
69
4.05%
🤣
67
3.93%
😭
61
3.58%
🤡
50
2.94%
👏
38
2.23%
🤯
36
2.11%
💯
31
1.82%
💩
26
1.53%
🤔
26
1.53%
😁
22
1.29%
🤮
14
0.822%
😢
10
0.587%
🥰
8
0.47%
🥴
8
0.47%
3 further kinds
15
0.881%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 292 of the 492 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,703 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 492 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 491 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krd_big. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 492 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.407%
2 of 492 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
267
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
431
over 489 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqw3k2UB
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
2W5zFHivdTw
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 492 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
В посёлке Российском жители страдают от нашествия крыс из-за стихийной свалки
На улице Рымникской в посёлке Российском образовалась стихийная свалка, которая уже стала настоящей проблемой для местных жителей. Мусор свозят со всего населённого пункта, и он лежит прямо у многоквартирных домов на улицах Ратной Славы и Куликово поле. Площадка не оборудована должным образом, из-за чего в дожди там образуются зловонные лу…
В Краснодаре за два месяца открылось 70 новых алкомаркетов
С июня по август число точек по продаже алкоголя выросло с 1316 до 1386. По абсолютному приросту кубанская столица обогнала Ростов-на-Дону и Нижний Новгород, заняв первое место среди всех исследованных городов. По темпам роста — второе в стране (+5,3%).
При этом в Москве, Петербурге и Красноярске таких магазинов стало меньше.
Почти половина россиян столкнулась с ухудшением психологического состояния
Исследование Института психологии РАН показало, что у 49% опрошенных выявлены признаки ухудшения психологического состояния. У 33% — тревожность, у 36% — высокая тревожно-депрессивная симптоматика.
Эксперты связывают это с экономической неопределённостью и пессимистичными ожиданиями.
— Как вы считаете, что помогает справляться с тревогой в …
В Карасунском округе рабочие устроили несанкционированную свалку
Читательница прислала фото с улицы Кубанской, 62 — прямо под окнами дома строительный мусор. Кто-то из рабочих решил не вывозить отходы, а сваливать их в одном месте, превратив двор в стихийную свалку.
Похожие случаи в Краснодаре не редкость. Только за 2025-й и начало 2026-го власти ликвидировали 56 свалок в городе, больше всего в Прикубанском и Карас…
На Кожевенной, 117 произошёл пожар — горела обшивка здания
Сегодня в 16:22 на пульт диспетчера поступил сигнал о возгорании. Пожарные прибыли через минуту. Оказалось, что загорелась обшивка здания на площади 10 квадратных метров. К 16:39 огонь локализовали, через 5 минут потушили, а в 16:46 ликвидировали последствия. Работали 9 человек и 2 единицы техники.
Всё случилось на улице Кожевенная, 117. Хорошо, что обошлос…
Мошенники начали обманывать россиян под видом обеспокоенных соседей
Новая схема: жертве пишут, что кто-то подозрительный ходит возле её двери, и присылают файл с «подтверждением». Вместо реального видео — ссылка на вредоносный файл, который перехватывает доступ к устройству и позволяет угнать аккаунты в Госуслугах и банковских приложениях.
Откуда мошенники знают, в какой квартире живут жертвы — неизвестно. Но схема…
В гроте парка «Краснодар» поселились 14 кристаллических композиций — самая большая 90 см
Полтора месяца работы — и теперь в новом пространстве Парка облаков живут 14 кристаллических скульптур. Самый крупный экземпляр достигает 90 см в высоту. Автор проекта прошла весь путь: от 3D-моделей и силиконовых форм до сборки каждой композиции на месте.
По-настоящему оценить результат удалось ночью, когда парк был закрыт для…
2,5 года на снос ларькового кластера на Ржаной, 12 в Знаменском
Управление муниципального контроля отчиталось о сносе торгового центра типа «кластер ларьков». Он появился между 2017 и 2019 годами и поэтапно расширялся.
Суд принял решение о сносе ещё в феврале 2024 года, но прошло 2,5 года, прежде чем администрация сообщила об устранении архитектурного самоуправства. Владельцы снесли постройки сами — силовиков не пр…
Полиция продолжает искать 14-летнюю Александру Жогину
Девушка ушла из дома на улице Сахалинской. Приметы: рост 164 см, славянская внешность, голубые глаза, хромает на правую ногу. Если вы видели Александру или знаете, где она может находиться, сообщите по телефону +7 (967) 300-46-45, 102 или в ближайший отдел полиции.
Каждая минута на счету. Поделитесь информацией, помогите найти подростка.
В Краснодаре мужчина клеил дешёвые штрихкоды на дорогие продукты — попался по камерам
В гипермаркете на Любимово 46-летний местный житель наклеивал на дорогие товары штрихкоды от дешёвой продукции. На весах выбирал позиции подешевле, печатал этикетки и клеил их на мясо или рыбу. Оплачивал на кассе самообслуживания.
В этот раз его заметили по камерам и вызвали Росгвардию. Выяснилось, что он уже делал так раньше. Теп…
⚠️ Если вы стали очевидцем происшествия, или у вас возник какой-то вопрос , пишите 👇
https://max.ru/id237310641749_bot?start=tkPzKEB5w8YRbw
Showing the 12 most recent of 492 posts we hold for @krd_big. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Большой Краснодар” (@krd_big), 11,981 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krd_big.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.