Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74–227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 12:01
209
+91
29 Aug 2026, 15:18
118
+2
23 Aug 2026, 09:15
116
+10
15 Aug 2026, 14:23
106
+14
9 Aug 2026, 13:32
92
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:13
92
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
2s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
33
35.9%
😍
15
16.3%
👍
12
13.0%
custom 6046205284269953547
11
12.0%
custom 5300894846276354878
9
9.78%
❤
8
8.70%
custom 5436379881686454553
4
4.35%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
поезд Барселона — Валенсия
я всегда очень любила писать, но писать именно свои мысли. единственной крайне нелюбимой задачей на уроках русского языка для меня было изложение. излагать чужое творчество в кратких смыслах? это всегда было для меня крайне скучным, непонятным занятием. более того — я всегда очень медленно писала и не успевала ничего записывать.
мне очень нравилась запрещенная социальная сеть во времена, …
прошли самые незабываемые полмесяца на Тенерифе. сейчас я пишу из городской среды и присутствует легкое ощущение четырехгранной клетки, психика не успевает сузить размер до городских улиц. радует одно: этот город — излюбленная Барселона. впервые я познакомилась с островами, в которых сложилось абсолютно все:
🔘климат и природа — заземляют;
🔘архитектура и гастрономия — насыщают внутреннего эстета и гедониста;
🔘сервис и…
пять этапов отношений и их ловушка 🩷
думаю, что вы сталкивались со множеством различных этапизаций отношений на просторах различных социальных сетей, но мне очень откликнулась та, про которую мне упомянули на крайнем вебинаре. эта классификация смотрит на отношения как на живой развивающийся организм.
этапы отношений:
🔘влюбленность
🔘различия и дифференциация
🔘автономность и индивидуальность
🔘возвращение
🔘взаимозави…
совсем забыла здесь вам рассказать, что имеется еще одна социальная сеть, которая посвящена мне в психологии — вот 📌
«вот» — кликабельная ссылка
буду рада обратной связи и поддержке! 🎈
в мире турбулентности, волн, недоверия и качелеобразности есть сила, обладающая невероятной стабильностью, надежностью, прозрачностью и весьма сильной прогнозируемостью.
это та сила, которая явно в моменты внутреннего человеческого шторма подсвечивает и напоминает ему о стержне, о силе, о любви.
при взаимной встрече взорами с этой силой все рубежи, резкие толчки пропадают, ты начинаешь мыслить глубже, но масштабнее…
вытекает вопрос — какой формат подачи информации вам ближе?
(можно выбрать несколько)
текст63%
голос50%
видео75%
The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
созависимость — «слишком сильная любовь»? ♠️
в продолжение темы сепарации
недостаток личной автономии — причина созависимости. если человек не опирается на себя, он начинается искать ее в партнере, постепенно растворяясь и теряя собственные границы.
основные симптомы созависимых отношений:
✔️ощущение пребывания в ловушке унижающих, контролирующих отношений;
✔️потребность в постоянном одобрении;
✔️ощущение бессилия…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kristinaaaaaa28. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
вытекает вопрос — какой формат подачи информации вам ближе?
(можно выбрать несколько)
текст63%
голос50%
видео75%
The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“по́черк души | психолог Кристина” (@kristinaaaaaa28), 209 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kristinaaaaaa28.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
