Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 35 days, net +109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,325–34,480 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 04:21
34,461
+11
6 Sept 2026, 18:39
34,450
-6
4 Sept 2026, 08:17
34,456
-6
3 Sept 2026, 00:15
34,462
+5
1 Sept 2026, 23:26
34,457
+8
1 Sept 2026, 00:24
34,449
+1
31 Aug 2026, 02:23
34,448
-2
29 Aug 2026, 23:08
34,450
-6
28 Aug 2026, 22:23
34,456
-2
28 Aug 2026, 01:23
34,458
+14
26 Aug 2026, 22:07
34,444
-8
25 Aug 2026, 19:14
34,452
+2
24 Aug 2026, 17:03
34,450
+4
23 Aug 2026, 00:25
34,446
+12
21 Aug 2026, 12:07
34,434
-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:04
34,435
+7
19 Aug 2026, 15:33
34,428
+17
18 Aug 2026, 13:55
34,411
+9
17 Aug 2026, 13:08
34,402
-3
16 Aug 2026, 05:14
34,405
first reading
Engagement
498 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 34,461 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,510
397 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
397
of 498 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
498 (5 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
1,392,970
Reactions total
17,587
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Sept 2026, 02:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
48m 51s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 84 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22,859 reactions across 498 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,540
19.9%
🤡
3,398
14.9%
🤣
3,002
13.1%
👍
2,067
9.04%
🤬
2,005
8.77%
😭
1,425
6.23%
😱
1,096
4.79%
👎
1,023
4.48%
🔥
905
3.96%
🕊
628
2.75%
🤮
498
2.18%
🙏
478
2.09%
💘
447
1.96%
🗿
171
0.748%
💔
163
0.713%
🤷♂
153
0.669%
⚡
149
0.652%
👏
129
0.564%
🙈
116
0.507%
🤯
108
0.472%
7 further kinds
358
1.57%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 498 of the 498 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,859 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 498 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 498 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kulive96. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 498 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.803%
4 of 498 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,210
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,610
over 494 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGagQAu
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2W5zFHaYwso
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2W5zFJdCip1
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2W5zFK2Ygwb
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 498 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Сегодня стала свидетельницей неприятной сцены в Магните. Пожилая бабушка набрала продуктов, подошла к кассе, а сумма вышла чуть ли не в два раза больше
Оказывается, дело в хитрых ценниках. На них сейчас целые условия, допустим если берешь 2 товара - 99 рублей за шт, а если один товар - 154, однако 154 - мелко, а 99 рублей - крупно.
Предупредите своих пожилых родственников, молодые вроде соображают, пишет автор пост…
❗ Полиция Каменска-Уральского задержала гражданина Узбекистана, 2004 г.р., при личном досмотре у него изъято 103 свертка с метадоном (около 70 г).
Он планировал сбыть наркотики через закладки в Кургане, но не успел. Возбуждено дело о покушении на сбыт в крупном размере (ст. 30 УК РФ), фигурант задержан. Ему грозит до 20 лет лишения свободы, сообщает полиция Каменска-Уральского
✅ Если плохо грузит - подпишись на на…
⛽ Кого только и на чём только не увидишь в очереди за бензином в Каменске-Уральском! Фото публикует Ольга в чате Бензин Каменск-Уральский.
Придумаем название к фото?
✅ Если плохо грузит - подпишись на наш МАХ
Подпишись | Прислать новость
✅ Выборы в Думу Каменска-Уральского - 20 округ
Кандидаты на данном округе:
👤 Тарейкина Галина Анатольевна, 02.01.1980, директор ООО "ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ КРАСОТЫ", Новые люди
👤 Михалева Наталья Викторовна, 17.04.1974, менеджер в ООО "ИСО", самовыдвижение
👤 Филинкова Ольга Юрьевна, 08.10.1969, неработающая, самовыдвижение
👤 Терентьев Валентин Игоревич, 17.05.1983, руководитель Пресс-службы. "РУСАЛ Каменск-Уральский" Подраздел…
❗ Авария в Старом Каменске на перекрестке Ленина - Революционная, сообщает подписчик с места событий.
✅ Если плохо грузит - подпишись на наш МАХ
Подпишись | Прислать новость
✅ В Каменске-Уральском может появится новый парк в Синарском районе
📍 В Каменске-Уральском готов проект нового общественного парка (территория на улице Павлова у школы 60). Автор идеи — известный в городе хореограф, основатель танцевального дома «Шаг вперёд» Вадим Пимошин. Сейчас ищут предпринимателей и компании, готовых благотворительно помочь в обустройстве. На вопросы ответит Вадим в комментариях, также ему можно…
✅ По 19-му округу в нашем голосовании победу одерживает Карпов Александр Иванович, Единая Россия
2-е место — Гаврилин Алексей Анатольевич, самовыдвижение
3-е место — Гилев Глеб Макарович, КПРФ
4-е место - Худиева Наталья Вячеславовна, самовыдвижение
5-е место - Лихачева Мария Павловна, самовыдвижение
💡 Далее мы познакомим вас с кандидатами и запустим голосование по 20-му округу!
✅ Если плохо грузит - подпишись …
Подросток-зацепер лишился ноги на железной дороге
Парень забрался на грузовой поезд на перегоне Звезда — Аппаратная (в Екатеринбурге). Во время движения он сорвался с вагона и попал под состав. Ребёнок получил черепно-мозговую травму и травматическую ампутацию левого бедра.
Транспортная прокуратура начала проверку и оценит работу органов профилактики.
❗ Родителей призывают контролировать досуг детей и напоминать им…
❗ Сотрудники полиции Каменска-Уральского задержали ранее судимого местного жителя 1979 года рождения по подозрению в незаконном обороте наркотиков.
При личном досмотре у него изъяли 5 пакетиков с мефедроном (более 3 г), приготовленных для закладок. При обыске дома найдено еще 22 пакетика с тем же веществом (более 20 г).
Мужчина приобрел наркотики через мессенджер, расфасовал и планировал сбыть.
Возбуждено уголовно…
Каменцы удивлены ценами на Витаойл
Фото опубликовали в чате Бензин Каменск-Уральский 9 сентября, такие цены на АЗС на Суворова. Даже с такими ценами на заправке есть очередь, а АИ-95 - уже раскупили.
Берем? 😱
✅ Если плохо грузит - подпишись на наш МАХ
Подпишись | Прислать новость
14-летнему жителю Свердловской области грозит до 5 лет колонии за подготовку диверсии
Подростка завербовали в соцсетях, пообещав «лёгкий заработок». По версии следствия, он фотографировал стратегические объекты в Камышловском районе и отправлял куратору снимки и координаты. Эти объекты планировали повредить или разрушить.
Позже обвиняемый предложил сверстникам за деньги выполнять такие же задания. Они отказались и …
🤡18❤11😭3👍1🤣1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 498 posts we hold for @kulive96. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На эти деньги — достойные пенсии, ипотека под 3%, порядок в ЖКХ, школы, рабочие места для уральцев, а не для мигрантов. Кто заработал — тот и тратит. 👉 А на что вы потратили бы эти деньги? Пройдите опрос, пишите в комментариях, что для вас самое важное
Достойные пенсии46%
Доступное жильё61%
Порядок в ЖКХ50%
Дороги и транспорт46%
Медицина и поликлиники51%
Школы и детские сады40%
Очистные сооружения и экология31%
Рабочие места и зарплаты для своих, а не для мигрантов59%
The shares total 384%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Почему рейтинг ЛДПР в Свердловской области растёт?
ЛДПР предложила налоговый реверс: оставлять 70% наших налогов у нас в области вместо нынешних 50%24%
Партия требует вернуть ЖКХ под контроль государства и тарифы не выше 10%24%
Они запускают «Народную ипотеку» под 3%22%
Согласны с ЛДПР: пенсия 2 000 ₽ за каждый год стажа15%
Только ЛДПР жёстко высказывается против мигрантов15%
Потому что Жириновский всё предвидел и не ошибся51%
Другое (напишу в комментариях)20%
The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Опрос молодежи: Какая проблема для тебя самая острая?
Нет работы по специальности25%
Низкие зарплаты67%
Слишком дорогая аренда жилья39%
Образование не дает реальных навыков для работы32%
В моем городе нет мест для отдыха (клубы, секции, пространства, мероприятия)30%
Дорогая ипотека43%
Не хватает общественного транспорта, дороги в ужасном состоянии49%
Я не молодежь, мне интересно посмотреть результаты14%
The shares total 299%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 498 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Новости Екатеринбурга и Области @ekaterinburg_smi · 55,469 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
Екатеринбург с огоньком @ekattop · 35,364 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Екатеринбург live @yo_burg · 60,934 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Подслушано Каменск-Уральский” (@kulive96), 34,461 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kulive96.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.