Channel
@lacticac
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,264subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001814305490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lacticac |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lacticac |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 1,264 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 1,263 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 1,262 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 1,263 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 1,262 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 1,259 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 1,255 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 1,253 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 1,252 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 1,252 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
194 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 67 | 34.5% | |
| ❤ | 62 | 32.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 12.9% | |
| 🤣 | 19 | 9.79% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 3.09% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 2.06% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 2.06% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 1.55% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.515% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Меня порой, как тренера, спрашивают со стороны коллеги: - ну как тебе? Вопрошатель обычно в этом случае демонстрирует своего клиента лично или его видосы. Я в этот момент максимально сдержан в комментариях и как правило вообще отказываюсь от них. Может там и есть «до чего доебаться в технике». Но любое движение нужно оценивать в общем прогрессе, временной динамике, учитывая точки А, В, С и так далее… А я, как го…
🔥26❤13❤🔥9👍4👎1
Зарегался с Наташей в команды на Алсанчак. Это командные соревки в турции в ноябре. Из интересного: - сильные составы - будем много наших команд во всех дивизионах - много элиты из рф Из не очень интересного: - стартовый взнос 950 евро с команды - но туда входит 3 ночи проживания и все включено С летними кемпами я не планировал себе никакие большие старты на лето и вот наконец то можно будет крепко подготовиться и…
❤19🔥11❤🔥2
Самый ценный совет в фитнесе мне дала училка Английского в пятом классе. «Алексеев (это моя фамилия) не седи с ногой под жопой». Училка была послана нахуй хамоватым юнцом, а регулярное сидение с ногой под жопой сформировало ряд перекосов и компенсаций в классическом треугольнике по линиям - голень, таз, спина/плечи. Теперь расплачиваемся. Разминаемся порой по 50 минут, ебемся с мобильностью, пытаясь чуть вывернуть…
❤9❤🔥7💅4💘3🔥2💯1
Тут без цензуры много нутрянки меня и нашей организации 🔪 https://t.me/artem_tofu2
❤1
Выходные прошли. Радует, что даже при наличии разных стартов в отдаленных углах страны, наши ребята есть везде. На Тюмени блестели сразу в нескольких категориях. На Crace держали хорошие темпы в Москве. Часть главных стартов прошли и можно смело тренироваться, выстраивать долгосрочную работу и становиться сильнее.
🔥5❤2❤🔥2
Я кстати провел такой же опрос в инсте и там победила Тюмень. Внутри меня тоже в этом году почему то больше теплится интерес к нашему турниру, где друзья, знакомые и просто гораздо более известные уху атлеты. Игры мы обязательно посмотрим (или хотя бы полистаем), но пока будем «ближе к земле», так сказать.
❤5
Кто заберет Тюмень в элите? Варианты?
❤2
Что смотрите, за чем следить будете?
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Самое лютое в кроссфите в РФ - это не проблемы с залами, не недостаток стартов, не залетающие не в свою категорию крепыше. Все это ерунда по сравнению с термином «группировка носков к перекладине». Это ж надо было придумать.
🤣19😁6❤3
Без лишних соплей и подводок, есть два места на ведение и персональную работу. Если вы хотите развиваться, улучшить свои навыки, может планируете начать соревноваться и не только, напишите мне @artem_tofu Все обсудим
❤5🔥5🙏2
Отчет по соревам выходного дня. В прошедшие выходные в красивом Нижнем Новгороде прошли соревнования CROSS CHAMPIONSHIP 2026, где классно провели время мои ребята. Давайте небольшой отчетик 👇 Денис. Денис выступал в новичках. К соревнованиям мы подошли после болезни или даже во время, что наложило свой отпечаток. В финал не прошли, но классно провели время. Дима. Дима выступал в RX. Я уже как то упоминал, что мне…
🔥18❤🔥5❤3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @lacticac. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что смотрите, за чем следить будете?
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Молочная кислота и Крепкая Работа🔪” (@lacticac), 1,264 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lacticac.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.