Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for grlla (ex Lava)

Channel

grlla (ex Lava)

@lava_gorilla

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,172subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001900097903
TypeChannel
Username@lava_gorilla
CreatedBetween 1 January 2023 and 30 November 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lava_gorilla

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1721,1831,177.56 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,178 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,181 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,182 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,183 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,182 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,181 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,180 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,179 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,178 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,172 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 38 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,170–1,185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 18:171,172-6
10 Sept 2026, 09:211,178-1
4 Sept 2026, 17:381,179-1
1 Sept 2026, 11:381,180-1
29 Aug 2026, 21:241,181-1
26 Aug 2026, 19:121,182-1
24 Aug 2026, 00:561,183+1
20 Aug 2026, 03:431,182+1
12 Aug 2026, 22:431,181+3
9 Aug 2026, 12:331,178-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:011,180no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:221,180first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3127.0%
😭2925.2%
1613.9%
🥰1412.2%
🍌97.83%
🐳65.22%
custom 526730054409494879454.35%
🤬32.61%
😐10.87%
🤨10.87%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 21 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Mar 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,050 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

мы прямо сейчас на атх крипто рынка друзья

🤬31

21 Mar 2026, 13:47 UTC≈1,080 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

вот знаете смотришь на проект и думаешь блять ну это труп просто уже ниже некуда а потом взгляд кидаешь на капу и видишь рядом разлок на 8 мультов баксов и понимаешь что это еще хаи

👍13

16 Mar 2026, 09:27 UTC≈1,390 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

я не могу больше ютуб совсем ебнулся он мне каждый день вот таких дегенартов программистов подсоовает блять

😭10custom 52673005440949487943

16 Mar 2026, 08:54 UTC916 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

я либо пока не понимаю реально глубоко эти эконмоические процессы (что я допускаю с образованием птушника) но как мне кажетя пузырь возникает тогда когда ожидание имеет ебанутый дисконнект с реальностью

👍4custom 52673005440949487942

16 Mar 2026, 08:51 UTC837 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

и мы все в равных условиях можем написать то что можно запушить сейчас в соц сетях а потом более умный тип навайбкодит софт со своим виденьем взяв мой софт как референс

👍3

16 Mar 2026, 08:50 UTC813 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

тогда можно ли назвать пузырем это? если любая обнова не раздута и на бумаге выглядит ахуенно, а она реально прям сейчас мной типом из рф применяется в работе, а также каким то типом штатах и в кремниевой долине, а еще эту же технологию щас использует чел в индии и в африке

🐳6

16 Mar 2026, 08:47 UTC755 viewsread 6 August 2026

я как то чекал интервью дороничева давно и он там говорит мол типо чем отлчается пузырь доткомов от этого это тем что была там компания которая понимала что интернет будет везде и проложила эти ебаные кабели под водой но никто не юзал тогда интернет и компания обонкротилась и че то такое то есть да очевидно всем что интернет будет но щас 1% этим пользуется а щас обнову пиздатую выкладывает опус и тут сразу десятки

16 Mar 2026, 08:44 UTC687 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

я буквально реализовал 70% софта за который платил деньги самостоятельно

1

16 Mar 2026, 08:43 UTC677 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

на сколько экономические процессы меняются я больше не отдаю деньги тем компаниям которым отдавал год назад с помощью вайбкодинга

3

16 Mar 2026, 08:42 UTC668 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

осталось туда интегрировать белые списки и буду как в тае

🍌2

16 Mar 2026, 08:41 UTC679 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Уже 2 месяц юзаю свой впн который развернул за 1 промпт на впс и он работает на столько идеально что мне иногда кажется что без впн интернет блять медленней чем с ним

🥰4

15 Mar 2026, 05:45 UTC683 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мак мини буду использовать для своих ботов как хост Идеальный Варик оказался Не шумит и работает ахуенно

👍9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lava_gorilla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FACK BLOCK RESEARCH
@fackblock · 24,911
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“grlla (ex Lava)” (@lava_gorilla), 1,172 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lava_gorilla.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.