Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,307–3,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 03:00
3,317
-8
12 Sept 2026, 08:21
3,325
-6
8 Sept 2026, 01:21
3,331
-11
2 Sept 2026, 18:43
3,342
-11
30 Aug 2026, 07:13
3,353
-1
27 Aug 2026, 14:54
3,354
-2
25 Aug 2026, 00:34
3,356
-2
21 Aug 2026, 09:57
3,358
-6
18 Aug 2026, 06:26
3,364
-6
15 Aug 2026, 15:58
3,370
-4
12 Aug 2026, 08:52
3,374
-5
9 Aug 2026, 06:41
3,379
-5
6 Aug 2026, 16:30
3,384
-3
6 Aug 2026, 09:20
3,387
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:19
3,387
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 11 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25m 14s
Average length
8m 25s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
617 reactions across 14 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
167
27.1%
👍
148
24.0%
custom 5321344757530636784
57
9.24%
🔥
56
9.08%
👎
54
8.75%
🏆
25
4.05%
custom 5348118316638543062
22
3.57%
🐳
17
2.76%
custom 5341816491513760731
12
1.94%
😁
9
1.46%
🤩
9
1.46%
🎉
8
1.30%
👏
8
1.30%
🥰
8
1.30%
🤔
6
0.972%
🤡
5
0.81%
🌭
4
0.648%
💯
1
0.162%
🥴
1
0.162%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2024 to 14 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
132
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 14 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
57
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sing_gorilla. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 May 2024 to 14 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ВАЙБКОДИНГ ПЕРЕЗАГРУЗИТ РЫНОК
Нас ждут на столько глобальные изменения что мне даже тяжело это описать. Я наконец нашел новую хуйню которая перезагрузит весь рынок и даст толчок и приток новой ликвидности в рынок. Давайте так. Я не часто угадываю конкретные проекты, но вектор развития часто удавалось прочувствовать.
Короче вот основные тейки из этого поста:
- Вайбкодинг обесценит 95% проектов выпущенных до 2026 год…
На самом деле удивительно, почему такой ожидаемый проект и зашиленный тестнет, а рефов мне упало 2-3.
Порог входа иметь мобильный антидетект + прокси + фаркастер, уже отсеял 95% людей, ведь уже не сделаешь 2к кошельков. Это один из последних интересных для меня проектов под дроп.
- Давайте так, если и делать какой-то тестнет, то тестнет проекта который собрал 260 миллионов баксов.
НЕ получишь дроп, ЕСЛИ пропустишь это
https://youtu.be/aPqTw3yL8mY
https://youtu.be/aPqTw3yL8mY
https://youtu.be/aPqTw3yL8mY
Я почти!) не совру если скажу, что метод из видео гарантия получения дропа monad, ибо абсолютно в каждом гайде есть условие накопить $MON. Мой личный способ это самая уникальная и качественная отработка.
- Cервис GeeLark (Промик gorilla 15% скидка)
- Лучшие мобильные прокси ("SINGUL" скидка …
Так смешно
Я спросил у разрабов в чате, не ошибка ли что они заработали в первый день запуска легендарного приложения 150$ с комсы. Они удалили сообщение и запретили мне писать ахах
Для сравнения сколько другие прилки в первый день запуска:
- Moonshot 100к$
- Clanker 16к$
- Flipp 150$
Блять я когда случайно запустил токен на кланкер заработал 300$ с комсы когда снайперы скупили его.
Ультра кринжовые типы.
BASE СОЗДАЛ АНАЛОГ MOONSHOT
давайте вспомним про наш щиток $dolphin. Они выпустили аналог moonshot только на base. Приложение называется Flipp.
приложение просто копирка moonshot. дизайнеры и разрабы прилки красавчики. достойно сделали продукт. уважаю. но скачивать и тогровать и брать комсу 0.75%. я лучше скачаю любое другое дерьмо и буду нормально со своего основного кошелька торговать. Да и кому вообще я буду рек…
Все кто потерял деньги на UST / Luna 3 года назад, сейчас можно вернуть средства
Там нужно заполнять форму и это юридическое дерьмо. Давайте соберемся все пострадавшие и поможем друг другу правильно заполнить формы и вернуть средства.
Твит Terra - https://x.com/terra_money/status/1906694568848015871
Пишите мне добавлю вас в чат @ioan_temnue
🐬 Dolphin......base.......
с моего первого репоста цена уже сделала x5. я уже заработал но продолжаю верить в проектик. давай его разберем
[■□□□] Neural sync initializing...
[■■■□□] Hidden layer detected...
[■■■■■■] Engage: [wow] [song] [rodeo] [zora]
Посмотрите на скрины как оно будет выглядеть. Выглядит ну минимум на 3-4 мульта капы, а если добавить приписку ai то плюс 10-20 мультов капы, а если сказать мол Game…
🌈 EigenLayer, Base стартапы, CoinBase, FarCaster, Lens, Story
Вкидываю свои мысли по отработке ретро и раскидал о своем вижене как Base будет топ 10 коин маркет кап. Также затронул ретродроп от Story. Ну и кстати немного про стартапы на base.
Обсудили все это на стриме, оповещал о стриме тут щит , кстати веду свои стримы на фаркастере и все такое
00:00 - бам бам бам
00:14 - EigenLayer ферма и что жду от $EIGEN
03:…
base x zora / coinseason
кажется мы в начале пирамиды но могу ошибться. сразу говорю я уже сделал несколько иксов на всем этом и без рисков сижу.
WOW - неделю назад появилась платформа построенная на zora где создаются щитки в сети base. Есть много намеков которые указывают что это платформа от Zora, можете почитать. У них есть щиток $wow и утилити 0.
DREAMCOINS - Вы можете по промпту создать токен и он сразу депо…
Короче не зря на рынке миллионеров долларовых единицы
Если ты четко по своей стратегии заработал x3 это на много лучше
Если ты случайно получил 30x
В первом случае ты станешь в перспективе долларовым миллионером и может еще дальше пойдешь.
Во втором случае, вероятно ты вернешься к тому депу с которого начинал.
- большинство людей которые стали победителями в лотереях в штатах. Которые выигрывали десятки миллионо…
AI + DAO: Новая формула создания глобального тренда
Тренды не повторяются. Недостаточно заменить переменную — нужна новая формула.
Многие говорят, что Чиа покажет взрывной рост, потому что манипуляторам нужно продавать жёсткие диски, а крупные компании по продаже жестких дисков хотят повторить успех продажи видеокарт.
В чём проблема? Когда стрелял майнинг эфириума, это была новая формула. Эта идея была новой, имела…
🔥41🤔6🤡5🌭4🏆3👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sing_gorilla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сингулярная Горила” (@sing_gorilla), 3,317 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sing_gorilla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.