Channel
@lawandsky
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
167subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001258642043 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lawandsky |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lawandsky |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 167 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 166 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 163 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 162 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 160 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 159 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 159 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
58 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 39.7% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 27.6% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 20.7% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Amicus Минюста США в деле Yukos v. Russian Federation, на мой взгляд, интересен тремя аспектами: Первое. Повторение того, что суд обладает компетенцией проверить правильность вывода арбитражного трибунала о наличии у него компетенции разрешать спор. Подобный вопрос уже затрагивался мною (тут). Второе. Необходимость разграничения понятий арбитрабельность спора (arbitrability) и заключенное арбитражное соглашение. Эт…
👍2
Posted without readable text
❤2
Нина Брон у себя в тг затронула интересную тему о сроках обращения в суд за взысканием судебных издержек по ГПК РФ и привела любопытное определение ВС РФ от 21.12.2021 N 6-КГ21-3-К2. По мнению ВС РФ, трехмесячный срок начинает исчисляться с даты вынесения последнего судебного акта, которым окончательно завершен спор. Если по делу было отказное определение ВС РФ , то срок исчисляется с даты определения ВС РФ. К слов…
❤3
Конкурсный управляющий воспользовался ИИ и … получил штраф за неуважение к суду. Думаю, нет смысла говорить о том, что судебная практика, приведенная управляющим в процессуальном документе, оказалась «галлюцинацией». 🤖
❤1🔥1
Posted without readable text
👍4🔥4
🇰🇿 Верховный Суд Республики Казахстан: анализ судебной практики рассмотрения заявлений о признании и приведении в исполнение иностранных арбитражных решений за 2023-2025 годы.
👍1
Как часто мы, судебные юристы, проверяем нормы, с которыми работаем практически каждый день? Приведу пример: дело, рассматривается уже не один месяц, «сходило» в Верховный суд, сейчас готовится к повторному рассмотрению в Верховном суде. В деле из раза в раз встречается один и тот же аргумент со ссылкой на один документ. Получив частную жалобу, увидев ссылку на документ особо не удивился, однако решил проверить, и…
👍3❤1
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8833129
Posted without readable text
👌2❤1
Два дня с ras.kad. ru и знаком с актуальной практикой признания на месяцы вперед.
👍1😁1
Posted without readable text
🔥1
Posted without readable text
🔥2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lawandsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Михаил Самойлов” (@lawandsky), 167 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawandsky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.