Channel
@lebladnet
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
133,350subscribers
-6,030 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001655982364 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lebladnet |
| Description | البلاد.. كل البلاد، بطولها وعرضها.. نحكي الناس والأرض والقضية |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lebladnet |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
93.5 average views per post against 133,350 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.07%. Across the 587 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,153–316,074 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.12% and 10.1%, with a median of 3.23%.
| Window | 30 days (7 September 2026 – 7 October 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 71 of 71 published in the window (71 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 6,636 |
| Mature posts only | 0.075% over 60 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 133,350 measured 3 October 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000:ara · 587 channels · p10 0.343% · p25 1.12% · p50 3.23% · p75 10.1% · p90 19.2% |
| Position in cohort | 0.512th percentile · 1/45 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.216% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 7 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 22:57 | 133,350 | -880 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 134,230 | -528 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 134,758 | -244 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 135,002 | -190 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 135,192 | -208 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 135,400 | -204 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 135,604 | -253 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 135,857 | -368 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 136,225 | -232 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 136,457 | -172 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:04 | 136,629 | -85 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:08 | 136,714 | -114 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 136,828 | -120 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 136,948 | -100 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 137,048 | -115 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 137,163 | -93 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 137,256 | -68 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 137,324 | -129 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 137,453 | -115 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 137,568 | first reading |
126 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 126 (3 August 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 6,636 |
| Reactions total | 60 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 23:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
157 reactions across 93 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 128 | 81.5% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 15.9% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لم يكن الغزي يتصور قبل ساعات من فجر السـ ـابع من أكتـوبـر أنه يودع كل ما اعتاد عليه في حياته وكل ما كان عاديًا، إذ صار اليوم حلمًا قد لا يعود، هذه هي اللحظات الأخيرة التي وثقتها كاميرات الغزيين قبل ساعات معدودة من العبـ ــــور، دون أن يدركوا أنها ستتحول مادة توثيق لإبـ ـادة جماعية بحقهم على مدى عامين متتالين.
😢1
بوابات حديدية ومكعّبات أسمنتية تغلق مداخل قرىً في الضفة، فتجعل الوصول إلى المدن والخدمات أكثر صعوبة، وتفرض على السكان طرقاً أطول وانتظاراً إضافياً… كيف تغيّر هذه الحواجز تفاصيل حياتهم اليومية؟
في غرف التحقيق الإسرائيلية، لا تنتهي محاولات انتزاع الاعترافات عند حدود الشبهات، بل تبدأ معها رحلة طويلة من الضغط النفسي والإرباك المعنوي. تُسوّق الجهات الأمنية استخدام جهاز كشف الكذب (Polygraph) ضد الأسرى والمعتقلين الفلسطينيين كوسيلة علمية للتحقق من المعلومات، لكن الواقع يؤكد أن هذه التقنية تُوظّف كأداة سيكولوجية للوصول إلى أهداف أخرى.
لم تعد خريطة الضفة الغربية كما تبدو في الخرائط الشائعة على الإنترنت، فمنذ اتفاق أوسلو 1993، توسع الاستيطان في أراضي الضفة الغربية، وقسمت إلى مناطق A، B, C عام 1995، قبل أن يقسم جدار الفصل أراضي الضفة، ويفرض حدوداً بين مناطق الضفة نفسها. هذا الواقع الاستيطاني والأمني جعل المناطق الفلسطينية في الضفة أقرب إلى مجموعة جُزر متفرقة ومحاصرة بأدوات الاحتلال داخل الضفة.
😢2
أصيبت الطفلة ليان بشظية في العمود الفقري تسببت لها بشلل نصفي، بعد قصف استهدف منزل عائلتها في غزة. خضعت للعلاج وسافرت إلى مصر على أمل استعادة قدرتها على المشي، لكنها عادت من دون تحسن. اليوم تواجه صعوبات في الحركة والدراسة والعلاج، وسط طرق مدمرة ومأوى غير مهيأ لحالتها.
بعد انقطاع دام ثلاث سنوات، عاد آلاف الطلبة في غزة إلى التعليم الوجاهي والافتراضي، موزَّعين على 700 نقطة تعليمية و25 مدرسة مؤقتة.
تدور في قطاع غزة فصول حكاية يومية صامتة يعيشها آلاف المصابين بالسكري. مع غياب الكهرباء وشح الوقود اللازم لتشغيل وحدات التبريد بالمستشفيات، بات الاحتفاظ بجرعات الأنسولين رحلة شاقة ومقلقة للعائلات. لا تقف التحديات عند هذا الحد، بل تمتد لتشمل ندرة شرائط الفحص الطبي وغياب الأغذية المناسبة لضبط السكر في ظل شح الأسواق.
تداول أهالي غزة رواية عن استدراج الشاب عدي العصار باتصال من جـيش الاحتـلال، انتحل خلاله اسم مؤسسة إغاثية لاستلام طرد غذائي. وبحسب الرواية، أُجبر عدي على اتباع مسار محدّد، وتلقّى تهديدًا بقـصفه وقـتل عائلته إذا أغلق الاتصال، وفق ما نقله للمواطنين حوله. وقال شهود عيان إنه سجد على الأرض قبل استهـدافه بلحظات، بعدما سار في طريق شبه فارغة تحت التهديد عبر الهاتف. عدي العصار ليس أول من يحصل معه هذا الأمر، والاحت،ــلال بات ي…
رمضان غبان، طفل غزّي يبلغ 12 عامًا، يبدأ يومه داخل خيمة نزوح قبل أن يتوجه للعمل في مقهى قرب شاطئ النصيرات. فقد والده خلال الحرب، وانقطع عن المدرسة، ويعمل لساعات طويلة لمساعدة إخوته، بينما يحلم بالعودة إلى مقعد الدراسة وحياة أكثر أماناً.
بعد تدمير مكتبه في خان يونس، حوّل المحامي أدهم القرا خيمة قرب المحكمة الشرعية إلى مكتب مؤقت يستقبل فيه موكليه ويتابع قضاياهم. واقع يعكس أزمة أوسع في غزة، حيث تضرر نحو 80 إلى 85% من مكاتب المحامين، فيما يعمل عدد محدود فقط من أصل نحو 3500 محامٍ مزاول.
😢1
أظهرت تحديثات حديثة لصور "غوغل إيرث" حجم التغير الذي طرأ على المشهد العمراني في قطاع غزة، مع ظهور مساحات واسعة من الأحياء وقد تحولت إلى ركام. ومع انتشار الصور، بدأ غزيون بالبحث عن منازلهم ومدارسهم وأحيائهم، في محاولة لتتبع ما تبقى من معالم المكان بعد الحرب.
😢3
حدّثت غوغل صورها الفضائية لقطاع غزة، كاشفةً للمرة الأولى بهذا الوضوح حجم التحولات التي أصابت المشهد العمراني. أحياء كاملة اختفت، ومساحات واسعة تحولت إلى ركام وأرض مكشوفة، خصوصًا في رفح وخان يونس وغزة. ووفق تقديرات أممية حديثة، تضرر نحو 82% من مباني القطاع، فيما دُمّر قرابة ثلثيها بالكامل.
😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @lebladnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leblad البلاد” (@lebladnet), 133,350 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lebladnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.