Channel
@leftcurvemaxing
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,066subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001936414807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leftcurvemaxing |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leftcurvemaxing |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 4,066 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 4,064 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 4,065 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 4,067 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:52 | 4,072 | +32 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 4,040 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 4,037 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 4,039 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 4,041 | +9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 4,032 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 4,031 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 4,028 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 4,034 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 4,038 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
79 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 67.1% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 19.0% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
more moves that show that theyre paying attention to what people are asking for = easier hold imo stats are kind of the elephant in the room atm, we're back at a point where we're trying to price it for future potential value rather than what the stats/buybacks are currently showing, but i like the r/r again after the last couple days of pivots still of the opinion that more pools/permissionless pools can jumpstart…
❤5
token works moving the buybacks up to 100% is the best move they could make for long term growth imo. they just bought a punk for 34e and deposited it into the gacha with 17e backing which means its legitimately winnable
❤3
what if we win
gonna look for other stuff while this cooks
❤2
from my perspective this is what we're working with now on FWA. invalidation is pretty easy sentiment wise i think adam has a bit to prove on the execution/deliverables side before a new wave of participants and buyers steps in so im still expecting churn for a bit would like to see it back above 12m over in the next few days before thinking about higher again, but from my perspective it remains the most interestin…
❤5👍3
p tight inval id close it around 1880
running a small short on eth. if it stalls out here id be looking to relong it around 1800ish
at the end of the day this is still one of the most interesting implementations of v4 hooks weve seen and thats the biggest positive in fwa's corner
looks like people like the tweet but im also not sure that this will really have constructive pa for a few more days and there will be more churn this is essentially a premarket chart. need some more protocol updates (personally hoping for another pool or permissionless pools to go live soon) and some time with external buyers in the mix to see what's really going to happen unique game theory situation as a result …
Its tough when there’s a token involved bc the dev team should be compensated for their work, but holders also need a reason to hold the token (thus value accrual through buybacks/rev share) But the alignment aspect of token works building out a protocol owned token treasury also fixes the “why should the dev care about price” aspect. Price shouldn’t be the focus but if you want people to trade/use your product, it …
❤6
Feels much better to me than yesterday’s adjustment
Tldr 30% of rev collected so far goes to buybacks over the next month (good) on top of the adjustment to a higher daily revenue buyback percentage
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @leftcurvemaxing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“leftys journal” (@leftcurvemaxing), 4,066 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leftcurvemaxing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.