Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for y22 trades

Channel

y22 trades

@y22_trades

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

18,507subscribers

+335 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002325165654
TypeChannel
Username@y22_trades
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/y22_trades

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,17218,51718,344.56 August 2026 — 18,172 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,172 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,176 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,185 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,188 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,198 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,210 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,224 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,221 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,226 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,214 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,255 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,246 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,279 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,285 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,283 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,330 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,372 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,376 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,380 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,422 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,441 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,436 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,432 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,435 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,437 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,446 subscribers6 September 2026 — 18,474 subscribers9 September 2026 — 18,470 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,468 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,517 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,509 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,507 subscribers18,5076 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +335. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,120–18,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:3818,507-2
15 Sept 2026, 17:1618,509-8
13 Sept 2026, 22:2018,517+49
12 Sept 2026, 02:1818,468-2
9 Sept 2026, 16:3718,470-4
6 Sept 2026, 08:5818,474+28
4 Sept 2026, 01:1618,446+9
2 Sept 2026, 17:3818,437+2
1 Sept 2026, 16:0718,435+3
31 Aug 2026, 18:2618,432-4
29 Aug 2026, 13:4218,436-5
28 Aug 2026, 11:5318,441+19
27 Aug 2026, 14:1518,422+42
26 Aug 2026, 14:5818,380+4
25 Aug 2026, 12:4218,376+4
24 Aug 2026, 09:4718,372+42
22 Aug 2026, 14:1118,330+47
21 Aug 2026, 04:5718,283-2
20 Aug 2026, 06:4518,285+6
19 Aug 2026, 08:2218,279first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 18,507 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,940
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
31
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held82 (19 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total152,990
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 02:16 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

thank you for 10k followers on the pumpfun app 🙏 i appreciate you

2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC≈2,630 viewsread 3 September 2026

why is half the timeline saying RH chain has topped? not even a single 1b dollar asset over there. yes, lots of ticker fatigue on lowcaps, lots of slop launching. but, signs of adoption are often indistinguishable from signs of froth. idk, i think its a fools errand to try to attempt to forecast an entire ecosystem pullback. better to react than to predict.

2 Sept 2026, 21:32 UTC≈3,010 viewsread 3 September 2026

i am very bullish on tokenized stocks meta. me think crazy stuff is going to happen. positioning myself in the most memeable tickers and infrastructure plays. me also think memeable tickers and / or cult community in tradFi are key. and some random penny stock is not gonna cut it. elite memetics are non-negotiable.

1 Sept 2026, 22:51 UTC≈4,100 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://pump.fun/profile/six666888eight crazy trade on niu lai. homie made 1.5m in a month. love to see it.

1 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈4,280 viewsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/pumpfun/status/2094801485842333972?s=46 limit orders now available in the pumpfun mobile app. i see a trade.

1 Sept 2026, 05:13 UTC≈4,200 viewsread 3 September 2026

upon further consideration, it was a good decision. good decision with bad outcome. but, as i always say, we cannot judge the quality of a decision by its immediate outcome. it was good to increase my cash balances and shift my cash / vol assets ratio to a more reasonable level. was the right move to reduce exposure a bit and maintain sound risk management.

1 Sept 2026, 03:42 UTC≈4,320 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

de-risked 1/3 of my bag at the stone bottom. great. fmgcl

31 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC≈4,380 viewsread 3 September 2026

yo, there is a new scam in the comments. they post shit about „auto-copytrade him, make money“ and if somebody engages with the comment they switch to DM and make you pay for some kind of software and then scam you out of your money. do not engage with these insects. i am deleting as much comments as i can, having auto-delete scanners on for certain keywords but these motherless fucks are creative and constantly com

31 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC≈8,120 viewsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/tokens/status/2094520356480733283?s=46 exponential growth. i see a trade.

31 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈4,590 viewsread 3 September 2026

i am literally in all the worst performing tokens in every segment. and everyhing i sold or faded or shorted giga ripped. bad day today.

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @y22_trades. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@y22_trades edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“y22 trades” (@y22_trades), 18,507 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/y22_trades.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.