Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лекар Лойко

Channel

Лекар Лойко

@lekar_loiko

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,184subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001767160409
TypeChannel
Username@lekar_loiko
DescriptionАвторский блог педиатра Ольги Лойко Написать мне @dr_Loiko https://exi-care.com/
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lekar_loiko

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1846,2406,2127 August 2026 — 6,239 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,239 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,240 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,235 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,236 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,237 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,233 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,229 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,223 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,213 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,214 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,211 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,204 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,197 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,194 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,192 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,189 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,185 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,186 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,188 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,186 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,184 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 90 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,176–6,248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 09:146,184-2
2 Nov 2026, 06:266,186-2
30 Oct 2026, 04:076,188+2
27 Oct 2026, 01:276,186+1
23 Oct 2026, 19:116,185-4
20 Oct 2026, 09:396,189-3
17 Oct 2026, 03:366,192-2
14 Oct 2026, 09:086,194-3
10 Oct 2026, 19:376,197-7
4 Oct 2026, 23:566,204-7
26 Sept 2026, 07:416,211-3
11 Sept 2026, 18:166,214+1
7 Sept 2026, 09:556,213-10
2 Sept 2026, 22:296,223-6
30 Aug 2026, 19:466,229-4
28 Aug 2026, 00:046,233-4
21 Aug 2026, 03:416,237+1
17 Aug 2026, 23:426,236+1
14 Aug 2026, 15:586,235-5
11 Aug 2026, 03:336,240first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 6,184 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held15 (3 June 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total1,110
Reactions total61
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
132
Links
144

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

582 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤40970.3%
👍6611.3%
🔥508.59%
💯305.15%
👀71.20%
🕊61.03%
😍50.859%
🤔30.515%
😐20.344%
🤗20.344%
🌚10.172%
🤝10.172%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 582 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Oct 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,110 views61 reactionsread 6 November 2026

41* _что дети думают о смерти Меня волнует, как сложно взрослым говорить с детьми о смерти (как и о сексе, про который что-то такое говорить научились) Если такой разговор связан с болезнью, даже обыденной, или трудным периодом жизни, то разговоры и вовсе чаще покрываются всеобщим притворством. Но чем больше эта тема вытесняется, тем выше, кажется, к ней чувствительность. Разговоры на эти темы кажутся болезненным …

❤49🔥12

Signed Ольга Лойко

27 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,760 views76 reactionsread 6 November 2026

40* _тики- таки Tic disorder Я тут усиленно храню свое право на молчание, как видите. Не множу перемноженные сами на себя знания. Педиатрия и ее практика сейчас не так уж быстро меняется. А практически значимые открытия не прирастают столь быстро, как прирастают блоги и информация в них. На мой взгляд, это множит не только информированность, но и запутанность родителей, в тревожном стремлении постоянно сверяться "я…

❤38👍31💯6🤗1

Signed Ольга Лойко

8 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC≈2,660 views36 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @zanped

Шок-контент: модель анафилаксии и адреналин Анафилаксия — серьёзная системная потенциально жизнеугрожающая аллергическая реакция. Большинство клинических руководств предписывают в качестве вмешательства первой линии внутримышечное введение адреналина в дозе 0,01 мг/кг (до 0,5 мг) с повторением через 5-15 минут если симптомы сохраняются. Клинические исследования эффективности адреналина при анафилактических реакциях …

🔥23👀7❤4👍1🤗1

Signed Ольга Лойко

8 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC≈2,270 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Роман тут угощает всякими статьями в духе моих ужасных размышлений. Читайте, только не волнуйтесь, это всего лишь медицинский юмор. Это шалость просто, так, поисследовали немножечко, нервишки пощекотали 😁 Всё, конечно, давно доказано, понятно, мы знаем, что делаем, и всех спасут... но это не точно

❤8👍3

Signed Ольга Лойко

6 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC≈2,380 views92 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Ну, и история к размышлениям, как вы любите. Скажем, мой ферритин всю жизнь 8-14 (эх, а ещё врач, называется) До первой беременности, во вторую, в третью, и к моим 46 годам. Такая вот белорусская стабильность. Такой ферритин 8-14. Гемоглобин 126-132. Железо я терпеть не могу, но конечно, пробовала пару раз, ради приличия. Качество жизни, аппетит, препарат мне меняет сильно, ферритин, бывало, рос до 35-40 - ничего бо…

❤75💯10🕊6👍1

Signed Ольга Лойко

6 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC≈2,270 views65 reactionsread 6 November 2026

39* _одевая шапочку мракобеса и немного про анемию Какой же скучной (мне) грозит стать медицина. Вычисления, цифры отодвигают человеческое из неё в далёкие дали. Терапевтическая амбулаторная медицина, в том формате, в котором идёт ее развитие, легко осуществится ИИ, лучше, чем человеком. И все же телесное присутствие врача имеет значение. Никто пока всерьез не исследует какое. Но уже ощущается растущий gap Для па…

❤53💯5👍4🤔3

Signed Ольга Лойко

28 Jun 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Ольга Лойко

28 Jun 2026, 14:30 UTC≈2,060 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026

38* _ невоспалительные боли в мышцах, суставах у детей нередкость Это дети-"подарок" для остеопатов и всяких специалистов-телесников Одна из причин таких телесных болей "синдром гипермобильности суставов" (сгс) Я сама гипермобильная на всю шкалу Бейтона. И всю жизнь мне все болит, хоть тренера по гимнастике меня обожали в детстве из-за возможности свернуть в узел. Критерии гипермобильности менялись с 1967г., на с…

❤29👍3

Signed Ольга Лойко

17 Jun 2026, 04:33 UTC≈1,890 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤10👍1

Signed Ольга Лойко

17 Jun 2026, 04:31 UTC≈2,090 views36 reactionsread 6 November 2026

37* _научно о детском горшке (статья в скринах, акценты авторские, вы ставьте свои :)) 1. Введение *Приучение к туалету (ПТ) определено как сложный физиологический и когнитивный навык. * Авторы отмечают дефицит информации и высокую тревожность родителей по этому вопросу (правда?). 😱 2. Сформулировано как оценивать готовность ребенка * Физиологические признаки (контроль мышц, ощущение наполненности). * Нейроразвити…

❤36

Signed Ольга Лойко

16 Jun 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Ольга Лойко

16 Jun 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,600 views57 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Больше всего меня вдохновляет, когда молодой коллега делится своим удивлением от чего-то. 💔 С опытом, многое рискует стать обыденным. А вот это- "ух,ты, смотри, что прочитала (увидела, сделала)!" - вызывает улыбку и ответное желание тоже почитать со всей страстью. Присылает коллега скрин из статьи про горшок ( туалетный тренинг это зовут) и удивляется. А я удивляюсь ,что она удивляется и прочитав, имею несколько …

❤53😐2🌚1🤝1

Signed Ольга Лойко

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lekar_loiko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Занудная педиатрия — Роман Шиян
@drshnr · 37,029
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Заметки детского врача
@DrButriy · 137,619
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Федиатрия
@fediatrix · 53,910
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Профессия – педиатр
@profpediatrician · 19,645
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 October 2026
ninavaccina
@ninavaccina · 90,346
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лекар Лойко” (@lekar_loiko), 6,184 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lekar_loiko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.