Channel
@levelupswc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,724subscribers
-35 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001872032315 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @levelupswc |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/levelupswc |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 1,724 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 1,728 | -10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 1,738 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:04 | 1,741 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 1,747 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 1,752 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 1,758 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 1,759 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 110 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 69.2% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1,000 people have already joined Atlas Expedition. There are only 3 days left until the end of the challenge. Five short tasks fit perfectly into the weekend. Here’s what you can get: → entries into the draw for 5 prizes of $1,000 each — the draw takes place on August 25 → up to 50% off an annual SWC Pass subscription Participation is free, and no purchase is required. With months of exciting updates ahead, now i…
The course “Neural Networks for Life and Work” is now available with a subscription ✨ This is a beginner-friendly course for anyone who wants to understand neural networks without complicated terminology and start using them in real life. Inside the course, you’ll find: — essential knowledge about how neural networks work; — clear instructions and practical examples; — useful ways to apply AI at work and in everyda…
🎉1
We’re already 500 strong 🔥 Half a thousand people are already on the journey — and you can still join: complete five short tasks → get up to 50% off an annual SWC Pass subscription and receive entries into a draw for five prizes of USD 1,000 each. The draw will be held live during a broadcast at the end of August or the beginning of September. Participation is free, and the first step takes just one minute #Atlas…
❤1
When people hear the word “asset,” they most often think of real estate, a business, or other tangible possessions. But there is one asset that appears much earlier and influences many decisions in the future. That asset is knowledge 📚 Understanding how money works, why it is important to consider the impact of inflation, and how to analyze financial information helps you act more systematically and make more infor…
❤1
Atlas is launching. Be among the first to join — and get up to 50% off your SWC Pass. You can enter the giveaway for free: tickets are awarded for completing tasks along the Atlas Ekspedition route. Invite people, complete the stages, collect tickets — the more tickets you have, the higher your chances of winning. At the same time, everyone can get a discount up to 50% off an annual SWC Pass, with no lottery involv…
🔥2❤1👏1
Today, a personal brand is one of the key tools for professional growth. It helps build trust, increase visibility, and attract partners and new opportunities. The new “Personal Brand” course is now available on the platform — a practical program that will help you: ✅ build a strong and recognizable personal brand; ✅ create expert content and feel confident on camera; ✅ understand how platform algorithms work; ✅ de…
❤1
Opportunities rarely happen by chance. More often, they come through people 🤝 A new job, a partnership, or an exciting project — behind many important events in life are the connections we make. But networking isn’t about the number of contacts you have. It’s about building relationships that create value for both sides. That’s exactly what the course “Networking — The Key to a New Circle” is about. 🎓 In this cour…
🤔 What Do You Think AI Won't Be Able to Replace in the Near Future?
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
What Skills Will Be Most Valuable in 5 Years? 🤖 Artificial intelligence can already write content, generate images, analyze data, and even code. But some skills are becoming even more valuable. 📌 Communication The ability to express ideas clearly, collaborate, inspire others, and build meaningful connections will remain essential in every industry. 🧠 Critical Thinking As information grows, it's not enough to simp…
Have you fallen into the trap of endless learning too? 🤯 It often feels like just one more course, one more book, or one more video will finally make everything click. But time passes. Your phone is full of saved content, your mind is packed with useful information, yet little changes in real life. Why? Because knowledge alone doesn't create results. You can read five books about swimming and master the theory—but …
Why Doesn’t Life Change After Dozens of Books and Courses? 📚 Because knowing isn’t the same as doing. You can watch 100 educational videos, complete 10 courses, and read dozens of books. But if that knowledge never turns into action, nothing will change. Try this simple rule: ✅ After every article, write down one key takeaway. ✅ After every lesson, take one concrete action. ✅ Don’t move on to new knowledge until yo…
❤1
Imagine it's been a few days since your meeting, presentation, or speech. What do you think people will remember? Probably not every word or argument you made. But they will remember something else: ✨ Whether they enjoyed listening to you. 🤝 Whether you were easy to connect with. 💙 Whether they trusted you. That’s why two people with the same knowledge can achieve different results. One is listened to out of courte…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @levelupswc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤔 What Do You Think AI Won't Be Able to Replace in the Near Future?
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What do you think? Which skill is the most important today?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ENG_ Learning platform SMART” (@levelupswc), 1,724 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/levelupswc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.