☕️ Твій safe place з книжками.
✏️ Умови розміщення: https://cutt.ly/XwDV2MhB
▶️ Для зв'язку: @tali_admin
💌 Якщо ви хочете зробити мені подарунок: https://rewish.io/mBgDAA/wishes
💖 Подякувати: https://base.monobank.ua/QQVXDspYSuDL8
Created
5 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
54 measurements spanning 91 days, net -184. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,222–10,462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 10:36
10,250
-2
4 Nov 2026, 09:49
10,252
-3
3 Nov 2026, 07:15
10,255
-1
2 Nov 2026, 07:50
10,256
-5
1 Nov 2026, 04:59
10,261
-1
30 Oct 2026, 00:16
10,262
-1
28 Oct 2026, 23:19
10,263
-6
28 Oct 2026, 01:30
10,269
-4
27 Oct 2026, 01:15
10,273
-3
26 Oct 2026, 02:17
10,276
-7
24 Oct 2026, 23:15
10,283
-4
23 Oct 2026, 22:15
10,287
-3
22 Oct 2026, 23:56
10,290
-5
22 Oct 2026, 00:56
10,295
-3
20 Oct 2026, 17:28
10,298
-4
18 Oct 2026, 21:27
10,302
-1
16 Oct 2026, 20:27
10,303
-3
15 Oct 2026, 20:46
10,306
+1
14 Oct 2026, 23:36
10,305
-6
13 Oct 2026, 14:19
10,311
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 10,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
44 (30 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
23,590
Reactions total
992
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 20:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,100
Videos
≈344
Links
≈2,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,216 reactions across 43 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,099
34.2%
💯
458
14.2%
💔
425
13.2%
😁
262
8.15%
😭
137
4.26%
🤣
135
4.20%
🔥
127
3.95%
🤬
91
2.83%
✍
90
2.80%
🥰
87
2.71%
😢
58
1.80%
👏
57
1.77%
❤🔥
45
1.40%
👍
29
0.902%
👀
27
0.84%
🤯
19
0.591%
🤔
10
0.311%
🤝
10
0.311%
🤡
7
0.218%
🤷♂
7
0.218%
11 further kinds
36
1.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 44 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @liatris_book. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (30.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
😳 на минулий день народження подружка подарувала мені кайфовий рожевий планер. 27 днів до нового дня народження та місяць, як планер лежить спеціально на бильці ліжка, щоб я нарешті перестала відкладати використання красивих речей на потім. Пора 🦅
Хваліться, скільки красивих зошитів так і лежать у вас в шафці? 🥲
Світла немає по 10-15 годин, кацапня балується, надсилаючи сповіщення як не про вуличні бої, так про ядерку, на ніч окремі попередження в дусі «ааа, вночі єбалумби летітимуть, сто штук»...
а я пізнала дзен, бо читаю книжку, яка настроєм нагадує підліткові драми нульових, які я обожнюю.
Нам з вами зайвого приводу, щоб купити нову книжку, не треба, але знижки до Гелловіну натякають, що треба взяти більше, ніж зазвичай 👄
😛 З 30 жовтня по 1 листопада у всіх фізичних «Книгарнях "Є"» діє АЖ -35% НА ВСЕ при купівлі від двох книг, крім видавництв виключень!*
Час нагнати страху на свій список бажанок 😊
🐾 Всього дві книги або більше — і знижка вже твоя. Це жахливо вигідно!
* Знижка 35% застосовується на…
😉 я, звісно, більше фанатіла по «Вовченяті», але книжечку «Щоденники вампіра» теж дуже не проти почитати.
А ви в якій касті — «Вовченяти» чи «Щоденників вампіра»? 🤵
Друзі, у ранок, коли ми хотіли привітати вас із Днем української писемності та мови й поділитися анонсами листопада, маємо зовсім інші, невтішні новини 💔
Ми змушені повідомити, що ворог поцілив у наш склад. Атака на район, де він розташований, триває. Сьогодні фортуна нам не усміхнулася.
Нас тішить одне: ніхто зі співробітників не постраждав 🙏
Ми дуже хочемо показати вам новинки, які готували на листопад. Але поки…
Писати радіодиктант не маю можливості, але буду слухати. Приєднуйтесь, там Даша Астаф'єва та Артур Пройдаков будуть читати Артура Дроня🥹
https://www.youtube.com/live/yIBqpET0DPc?si=08wZQLbig3DO0Osr
Домовились з чоловіком подарувати одне одному «таємну» книгу і вирішила свій презент запакувати «по-модному», але він не любить канцелярію, тому я вирішила в цю упаковку засунути пів магазину. Вийшло не дуже естетично, зате з любов'ю 😁
Кажуть, найкраща стратегія після довгої відсутності в постингу — просто почати далі публікувати тематичні дописи, неначе і не було два тижні тиші 🧠
Але як це ви не знатимете, що я навчилась відтискатися на брусах, вийшла з дому, буквально за 5 хвилин до прильоту в сусідню будівлю, відсвяткувала нашу першу сімейну річницю, купила машинку мрії (але досі не завершила епопею з водійським, тому вона стоїть в гаражі і че…
Аудіокнижки в Spotify до кінця року стануть доступні в Україні 😎
Кажуть, що нас чекають понад 350 000 книг різними мовами. Деяким країнам до преміум підписки включать 12 годин аудіокниг, іншим — доведеться купляти план Аудіокниги+ або ж купляти окремі книги.
Нещодавно ходила на «Веріті» в кіно. Якщо підсумувати, то це можна зробити цим мемом.
І сюжет цікавий — маловідому авторку просять дописати книги за популярну письменницю, яка потрапила в аварію. І вона вирішує не тільки пописати, а й пожить життє за іншу.
Але ж яке воно все нудне, пласке і висмоктане з пальця, особливо — спойлер —
коли чулувік захуярив свою жінку, цю відому авторку, за те, що він і так знав . Всі …
💯35👎3🤝3
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @liatris_book. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Настрій читати Vivat 💚 @vivat_publishing · 35,778 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
📚 Непозбувний книгочитун @npzbvnkngchtn · 36,958 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
📚 Ранок Букера @RanokBukera · 24,469 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
Аудіокниги Українською📖 @audibookukr · 44,214 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
Книги Українською @booksua11 · 36,681 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 2 September 2026
Аудіокниги українською @abookua · 55,359 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Книги українською 📚 Бібліотека • Аудіокниги @knizhkyua · 45,999 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
Особистості | Цитати та афоризми @aquotes · 21,990 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжкова вісниця Ліатріс (Крадійка книжок)” (@liatris_book), 10,250 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liatris_book.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.