Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 41 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 503–531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:16
508
+2
11 Sept 2026, 07:56
506
-20
25 Aug 2026, 00:56
526
-1
10 Aug 2026, 10:06
527
-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:46
528
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 11 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
366 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
179
48.9%
custom 5316994904847560645
86
23.5%
🔥
34
9.29%
❤🔥
21
5.74%
💯
12
3.28%
custom 5379895190523757595
10
2.73%
👍
7
1.91%
🙏
6
1.64%
🏆
4
1.09%
💘
3
0.82%
🤝
3
0.82%
🐳
1
0.273%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 14 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @life_steps398. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 August 2025 to 24 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Несколько недель назад начался 6-й семестр в Сколково
Этот семестр называется "Предпринимательский" из-за обилия курсов, направленных на создание и изучение инноваций, а так же из-за (уже успевшего стать легендарным) стартап-модуля
🤟 Именно в параллели с этим модулем, мы в ближайшие 2 месяца будем запускать собственные стартапы, тестировать десятки гипотез, сводить юнит-экономику (когда-нибудь то она точно сойдется…
Плюсы и минусы GTD
В дополнении скажу о плюсах и минусах, чтобы было более четко понятны ограничения применимости
➕ Основные плюсы:
1. Подходит для параллельной работы над тучей проектов: система устроена так, что большое количество направлений работы никак не мешает функционированию
2. Подходит для асинхронных проектов: когда требуется взаимодействие с другими людьми или ожидание событий
3. Подходит для работы вм…
GTD
Я раньше писал про систему эффективности, которой придерживался более 250 дней. Кстати поделитесь, кто пытался внедрить себе, и какие у вас результаты 👀
Однако для формата работы, который есть сейчас в моей жизни, эта система подходит плохо, поэтому долгое время искал замену, и, как вы уже поняли, нашел достойную и работаю по ней более 2 месяцев
GTD или Getting Things Done решает ключевую проблему потери энерг…
Профиль обновил, 2026 начался
А, да, прошло уже 1.5 месяца 🕔
Последние несколько месяцев — внутренняя пересборка, новые направления, приоритеты, системы. А теперь восстаю из пепла, загораюсь и зажигаю всех остальных 🔥
Контента много есть и будет
С чего начнем?
Новый ключевой проект — образовательная настольная карточная игра 🎲 Это звучит совершенно неожиданно, но это так.
Предмет "Проектный менеджмент" на 3 курс…
Всем привет!
Я студент 3 курса бизнес-бакалавриата МФТИ🍏
и СКОЛКОВО🍎
Самое важное обо мне:
— Поступил по БВИ
— Учусь бесплатно — выиграл грант на 8 миллионов рублей
— Более 6 лет занимался олимпиадной физикой
— Работал PM в топ-1 игровом приложении Telegram App Center
— Репетитор по физике с 10+ учениками
— Работал над стартапом: получили грант 300к, но проект в итоге не взлетел
— Продолжаю строить стартапы
— Учусь…
Импровизация vs Системность
2 разных подхода к достижению целей
Один подразумевает быстрые уверенные действия, порой не структурированные и не всегда наиболее эффективные, но энергичные. Результат часто достигается количеством действий, попытками, быстрой обратной связью и корректировками
Другой включает в себя достаточно долгое планирование, методичные точные действия, подчиняющиеся правилам, структуре, но часто …
⚡️ Энергия в людях
Как экстраверт, я восполняю свою энергию в компаниях: среди друзей, людей с огнём в глазах. Там чувствуется энергия движения, развития, да и просто жизни 🔥
Еще недавно заметил, что сильно заряжаюсь, когда могу помочь другим: с их запросом, поддержать в трудную минуту, подбодрить или просто искренне поговорить. В такие моменты происходит честный обмен энергиями, в котором выигрывают оба.
И вот чт…
Как я за 2 дня чуть не попал в
Т-банк, но...
⚡️ В последние 2 дня до конца подачи заявки я вдруг осознал, что можно податься в Т-банк на позицию бизнес-аналитика
Времени не так много, но в физтеховской манере я успел сделать всё, что было необходимо для подачи:
— Оформление заявки на сайте с кучей полей
— Оформление CV
— Оформление мотивационного письма
— Тест и задачи по SQL (это было весело)
— Тест по математике
…
Топ 5 причин,
по которым закрываются стартапы (мой личный опыт)
👜 Закрытие EzShop — с этого началась моя летняя трансформация
В этот проект я вкладывал энергию, деньги, и самое важное — время, на протяжении 16 месяцев. Все прошлое лето я безустанно работал над этим стартапом, день и ночь сидел в боталке в Арктике (корпус на физтехе) и постигал азы маркетинга, управления командой, тестирования гипотез. Однако принял…
custom 531699490484756064529❤10💯8
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @life_steps398. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Интроверт — восстанавливаю энергию в одиночестве29%
Амбиверт — и так, и так57%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 24 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Лидерская позиция | Андрей Шапенко @leadership_position · 27,168 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Макс Зимин | Физтех, Сколково, стартапы и жизнь” (@life_steps398), 508 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/life_steps398.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.