Channel
@lifepublic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,663subscribers
+323 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001143100821 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lifepublic |
| Created | 12 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lifepublic |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 3,663 | +488 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 3,175 | -26 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 3,201 | -24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 3,225 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 3,237 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 3,247 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 3,255 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 3,272 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 3,284 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 3,301 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 3,315 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 3,326 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 3,338 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 3,340 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 3,340 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 30.8% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 26.9% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 19.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⤴️Ситуация, сложившаяся в преддверии выборов в Государственную думу Российской Федерации, представляет собой предмет для всестороннего анализа. В частности, конкуренция за второе место в политическом спектре характеризуется высокой степенью интенсивности и повышенным уровнем конфронтационности партии. Анализ динамики рейтинговых показателей демонстрирует значительную волатильность, что указывает на динамичность п…
🫡1
🟢 Электоральный рейтинг партий 27 июля – 2 августа 🐻 «Единая Россия» – 32,1% (-1,4 п.п. за неделю) 🟥 КПРФ – 10,4% (+0,7 п.п. за неделю) 🟦ЛДПР – 9,3% (+1,3 п.п. за неделю) 🟩 «Новые люди» – 8,6% (-0,9 п.п. за неделю) 🟨 «Справедливая Россия» – 5,8% (-0,2 п.п. за неделю) #выборы2026
🌳Электоральный рейтинг партий 20 – 26 июля 🐻 «Единая Россия» – 33,5% (+0,8 п.п. за неделю) 🟥 КПРФ – 9,7% (-2,2 п.п. за неделю) 🟩 «Новые люди» – 9,5% (-1,0 п.п. за неделю) 🟦 ЛДПР –8,0% (-1,6 п.п. за неделю) 🟨 «Справедливая Россия» – 6,0% (+0,6 п.п. за неделю)
🫡1
А меж тем пришла пора подвести итоги голосования по вопросу, кто был самым эффективным депутатом. И, глядя на Топтыгина и нынешнюю моду на всякого рода медали и ордена, решили всем обкомом учредить Орден Нюхля! 🏅 Орден Нюхля №1 👃 После долгих поисков, принюхиваний и пересчета всех найденных голосов Нюхль принял решение. 🏆 Первым кавалером Ордена Нюхля становится Рахим Азимов. В опросе «Кто был самым эффективным деп…
🔥2🤔2
В Липецкой области создан отряд мобильной огневой группы, состоящий из десяти местных высокопоставленных чиновников. Эти лица пройдут военную подготовку и будут нести ночное дежурство, защищая важные объекты инфраструктуры, такие как нефтебазы и электростанции. В состав отряда вошли вице-губернаторы Александр Рябченко, Роман Петрухин и Илья Карлин, министр региональной безопасности Алексей Кащеев, министр экологии и …
👍1🤔1
Кто был самым эффективным депутатом ГосДумы для Кировской области?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
🙏Возложил цветы у проходной «Авитека». Люди, желающие выразить соболезнования и почтить память, подходят к стихийному мемориалу, возлагают цветы в память о жертвах страшного террористического акта. Храни вас Господь !
❤4🤔1
🙏Трехдневный траур объявлен в Кировской области. Указ подписал губернатор Александр Соколов.
❤2
❗️Топливо на АЗС "Движение" в районе ТЦ "Грин Хаус" по дешевело ⛽ АИ- 95 115р АИ- 92 109р ДТ - 99.9 р Главное нет очередей👍
👍2
😢32 человека пострадали, из них 6 погибли на месте в результате атаки киевского режима на предприятие в Кирове, сообщил губернатор Александр Соколов. 🙏Выражаю слова глубокой скорби и соболезную родным и близким погибших. ❗️Предлагаю объявить трехдневный траур после ракетного удара ВСУ, почтить память погибщих , отменить все праздничные мероприятия и приспустить государственные флаги на территории региона.
❤2🫡2
🌳Электоральный рейтинг партий 13 – 19 июля 🐻«Единая Россия» – 32,7% (-2,6 п.п. за неделю) 🟥КПРФ – 11,9% (+1,8 п.п. за неделю) 🟩 «Новые люди» – 10,5% (-0,2 п.п. за неделю) 🟦 ЛДПР –9,6% (+1,4 п.п. за неделю) 🟨 «Справедливая Россия» – 5,4% (+1,4 п.п. за неделю) За два месяца до выборов, ситуация конечно может измениться, но у же сейчас видно что на фоне последних проблем с топливным кризисом и ударами по WB, рейти…
🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lifepublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто был самым эффективным депутатом ГосДумы для Кировской области?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇷🇺Константин Ситчихин” (@lifepublic), 3,663 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lifepublic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.