Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Товарищ Нюхль

Channel

Товарищ Нюхль

@nuhle

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,260subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001170137553
TypeChannel
Username@nuhle
Created13 April 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nuhle

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,2273,2603,243.56 August 2026 — 3,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,227 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,244 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,239 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,238 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,242 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,248 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,254 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,255 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,259 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,260 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,222–3,265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 23:373,260+1
2 Sept 2026, 18:173,259+4
30 Aug 2026, 07:183,255+1
27 Aug 2026, 10:153,254+6
24 Aug 2026, 05:383,248+6
20 Aug 2026, 14:123,242+4
17 Aug 2026, 21:143,238-1
12 Aug 2026, 02:033,239-5
9 Aug 2026, 05:023,244+17
6 Aug 2026, 09:413,227-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:493,228no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:243,228first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

400 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10125.3%
🤣8320.8%
😁7719.3%
💯6015.0%
👏297.25%
123.00%
👍102.50%
🥴71.75%
🐳61.50%
😢51.25%
🍓30.75%
😨30.75%
🍌10.25%
👀10.25%
🕊10.25%
😱10.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 429 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,070 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мммм только нам кажется, что это 😬 лютая дичь и кринж? У него место на груди еще осталось? А то союз клоунов России хотел якобы тоже его удостоить

🤣21🔥13💯7😨2😢1😱1

5 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC≈2,920 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера всем обкомом потрудились над каналом с политической аналитикой. Подписывайтесь https://t.me/perlook

🔥9

4 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈3,810 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Где сегодня хороним свою менталку?

  1. У телека. Там тепло, стабильно и 40% счастья.7%
  2. В телеграме. Ловлю панические атаки и думскроллю.56%
  3. Нигде. Мой мозг уже умер от избытка информации.23%
  4. Я вообще не читаю новости, завидуйте.18%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈3,820 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📺 Знания умножают печаль: почему интернет-скроллеры седеют в муках, пока бумеры у телека кайфуют Меньше знаешь — позже приедет ритуальная служба. ВЦИОМ подтвердил эту вековую мудрость цифрами, доказав: пока интернет-интеллектуалы выжигают остатки нервной системы, любители «ящика» живут в абсолютном, почти клиническом дзене. Официальный замер температуры в палате смертных. В телеке жизнь прекрасна: 40% зрителей све

🔥31😁1

4 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈3,600 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ожидаемо, что безалкогольный проект закрывается. Помнится, еще год назад на летнике Оффшора было не протолкнуться. Появившееся на его месте путем передела имущества (ну или что там бывает при «разводе» партнеров) зожное Фил Блум приказало долго жить. Потому что ЗОЖ - это пиздеж. А мы пытались осторожно намекнуть, между прочим.

😁31🔥7💯32👏1

29 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC≈8,570 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Они очень долго раскачиваются. У меня пока двойственное отношение. Не говорю, что работа не нужна, но оценить ни положительно, ни отрицательно не могу — слишком долго настраиваются. Надо действовать активнее, - сказала мадам мэр Кирова Елена Ковалева. Зато быстро тратят😁 МАУ Парк культуры им. Кирова не проработал и года, а так эффективно потратил 30 млн. Зря так Елена наша Ковалева, зря. Не это ли показатель эффект

😁10👏82

29 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈8,750 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А меж тем пришла пора подвести итоги голосования по вопросу, кто был самым эффективным депутатом. И, глядя на Топтыгина и нынешнюю моду на всякого рода медали и ордена, решили всем обкомом учредить Орден Нюхля! 🏅 Орден Нюхля №1 👃 После долгих поисков, принюхиваний и пересчета всех найденных голосов Нюхль принял решение. 🏆 Первым кавалером Ордена Нюхля становится Рахим Азимов. В опросе «Кто был самым эффективным деп

🔥5🐳4😁4👏2

29 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC≈8,440 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Глава Кирова, она же - председатель гордумы Елена Ковалева официально объявила, что переименование улиц волновало народных избранников больше, чем забота о людях. Сравниваем озвученные цифры: · Наименование улиц (переименование, присвоение) — 15% всех принятых актов. · Меры социальной поддержки граждан (льготы, выплаты) — 9%. Дикость, согласитесь? Получается, в городе тратят почти в 2 раза больше нормотворческих у

💯19🤣51👍1

27 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC≈8,720 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто был самым эффективным депутатом ГосДумы для Кировской области?

  1. Азимов Рахим40%
  2. Бутина Мария30%
  3. Валенчук Олег31%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤣34🍓2🐳2😨1

27 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC≈8,550 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥴7🔥2🍌1🍓1👀1

24 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC≈11,000 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Орали всем обкомом! Спикер регионального ЗакСо Роман Береснев, видимо, с бодуна и думает, что сказал что-то умное. Но - нет. Итог - депутаты расписались в бессилии. Вопрос: им в большинстве наплевать на безопасность своих избирателей?

🔥23😢4💯2🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nuhle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTCAnonymous Poll125 voters

Где сегодня хороним свою менталку?

  1. У телека. Там тепло, стабильно и 40% счастья.7%
  2. В телеграме. Ловлю панические атаки и думскроллю.56%
  3. Нигде. Мой мозг уже умер от избытка информации.23%
  4. Я вообще не читаю новости, завидуйте.18%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTCFinal Results461 voters

Кто был самым эффективным депутатом ГосДумы для Кировской области?

  1. Азимов Рахим40%
  2. Бутина Мария30%
  3. Валенчук Олег31%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Товарищ Нюхль” (@nuhle), 3,260 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nuhle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.