Channel
@lin_write
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
807subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001679529610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lin_write |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lin_write |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 807 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:59 | 805 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 807 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:21 | 809 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 809 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
477 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 168 | 35.2% | |
| 🔥 | 123 | 25.8% | |
| 👍 | 63 | 13.2% | |
| 💔 | 37 | 7.76% | |
| 😁 | 29 | 6.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 2.73% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 2.73% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 2.73% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 1.68% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 1.47% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.419% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 477 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Немножко писательских новостей/мыслей: 💞Мне показали драфт обложки новой книги. Я уже предвкушаю как красиво это будет в финале) К тому же отчасти будет перекликаться с тем, что уже вышло, что для меня отдельный плюс 💞Мне впервые в жизни написала редактор с предложением что-то написать/издать готовое. До этого инициатором первого контакта всегда была я. Прикольный и волнительный опыт, но до конца года я, скорее все…
❤11👍6🔥4
Оставляем?
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Пишу Милость дальше 😊 В некоторых сценах, где собирается много вампиров, прям чувствуется какая-то безуминка, хотя, вообще-то я ее не планировала. Пока не понимаю, хорошо это или плохо, но определенный шарм все же есть. #писательскаякухня
❤10🔥8⚡7
Posted without readable text
🔥15❤11👍8❤🔥2
Кажется, финансовая грамотность покинула меня в момент, когда появилась возможность купить чуть дешевле подарочное издание Голодных игр 😐 У меня есть обычное, но это мне как будто тоже надо. Да и цикл из молодежки самый любимый. Эх) Балуете себя импульсивными покупками? #книги
❤18😁11🤝8🔥6💯1
Начала слушать в пути. Пока нравится)
🔥17❤10👍8
В анонимке скопилась пара вопросов: А в этом году у тебя еще что-то выйдет? Скажем так, шансы есть :) Посмотрим, как пойдет. В писательстве все максимально зыбко, поэтому я уже боюсь говорить, будет что-то или нет. Но если выйдет - будет кое-что интересненькое. может глупый вопрос, но вы сейчас с кем-то встречаетесь? хотели бы? Нет, не встречаюсь и не очень-то хочу. У меня слишком много работы, непрочитанных книг и…
❤17👍13🔥5👌2
Кусочек Завесы ✨
❤17🥰9🔥8❤🔥3
Дедушки нет чуть больше 40 дней, а до меня до сих пор не доходит, что это в принципе случилось. Он был рядом всю мою жизнь, а с моих 6 лет до 17 мы еще и жили в одном доме. Ну и потом, когда он переехал к маме, виделись часто. Последние полгода – каждый день. Это была моя главная отцовская фигура и человек из самого-самого близкого круга, и принять то, что его нет – сложно. Несмотря на то, что характер у него, мягк…
💔37❤14🙏13
За эту неделю написала два авторских листа. Для меня сейчас это много, так что устроила себе ленивые домашние выходные. Завершаю их сериалом. Пока все нравится) Уютненько так. Как ваши выходные?
❤20👍16🔥8❤🔥1
🐯🦁В каталоге книг RC Books есть несколько историй из богатой красками и экзотикой вселенной новеллы «Кали — Зов Тьмы», и у всех общая черта: под романтической линией проступает, как кровь под белой повязкой, тревожная нота следующей по пятам за героями трагедии. 😦Иногда в этих историях из тьмы вероятностей появляются красными точками на карте жизни и судьбы прожигающие насквозь глаза тех, кто ушёл на ту сторону, пер…
🔥9❤6🥰3👍2❤🔥1
Какая смешная уть у нас на пруду живёт)
😁18❤10🔥6👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lin_write. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Оставляем?
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Екатерина (Вира) Лин || НеРеальность линий” (@lin_write), 807 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lin_write.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.