Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RC Books Stories

Channel

RC Books Stories

@rcbookscom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

47,921subscribers

-4,977 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001809768608
TypeChannel
Username@rcbookscom
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/rcbookscom

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

47,92152,89850,409.56 August 2026 — 52,898 subscribers6 August 2026 — 52,860 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,791 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,744 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,648 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,590 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,507 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,429 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,348 subscribers14 August 2026 — 52,231 subscribers16 August 2026 — 52,131 subscribers17 August 2026 — 52,062 subscribers18 August 2026 — 51,998 subscribers19 August 2026 — 51,934 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,844 subscribers21 August 2026 — 51,764 subscribers22 August 2026 — 51,662 subscribers24 August 2026 — 51,563 subscribers25 August 2026 — 51,479 subscribers26 August 2026 — 51,389 subscribers27 August 2026 — 51,329 subscribers28 August 2026 — 51,271 subscribers29 August 2026 — 51,177 subscribers30 August 2026 — 51,107 subscribers31 August 2026 — 51,039 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,965 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,903 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,834 subscribers5 September 2026 — 50,695 subscribers8 September 2026 — 50,462 subscribers11 September 2026 — 50,311 subscribers13 September 2026 — 50,165 subscribers14 September 2026 — 50,059 subscribers16 September 2026 — 49,924 subscribers19 September 2026 — 49,808 subscribers25 September 2026 — 49,508 subscribers4 October 2026 — 49,085 subscribers8 October 2026 — 48,863 subscribers13 October 2026 — 48,554 subscribers14 October 2026 — 48,441 subscribers15 October 2026 — 48,388 subscribers16 October 2026 — 48,340 subscribers17 October 2026 — 48,303 subscribers18 October 2026 — 48,246 subscribers19 October 2026 — 48,227 subscribers20 October 2026 — 48,179 subscribers21 October 2026 — 48,113 subscribers22 October 2026 — 48,046 subscribers23 October 2026 — 48,001 subscribers24 October 2026 — 47,958 subscribers25 October 2026 — 47,921 subscribers6 August 202625 October 2026
51 measurements spanning 80 days, net -4,977. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,174–53,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 16:1647,921-37
24 Oct 2026, 16:1647,958-43
23 Oct 2026, 17:0548,001-45
22 Oct 2026, 16:3548,046-67
21 Oct 2026, 09:2048,113-66
20 Oct 2026, 08:0648,179-48
19 Oct 2026, 07:5048,227-19
18 Oct 2026, 11:0548,246-57
17 Oct 2026, 09:0548,303-37
16 Oct 2026, 11:3848,340-48
15 Oct 2026, 12:3948,388-53
14 Oct 2026, 12:3048,441-113
13 Oct 2026, 00:5748,554-309
8 Oct 2026, 16:2048,863-222
4 Oct 2026, 07:4149,085-423
25 Sept 2026, 19:4149,508-300
19 Sept 2026, 05:3749,808-116
16 Sept 2026, 23:0149,924-135
14 Sept 2026, 23:2150,059-106
13 Sept 2026, 11:0150,165first reading

Engagement

139 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.98%
avg views ÷ 47,921 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,300
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 139 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held139 (23 July 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total163,510
Reactions total3,024
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Oct 2026, 10:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 26s
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,427 reactions across 136 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6,03152.8%
🔥2,29620.1%
❤‍🔥1,61514.1%
🥰6886.02%
💘5304.64%
👏710.621%
🎉630.551%
🦄500.438%
👍480.42%
🗿140.123%
🍾130.114%
😢50.044%
💔20.018%
💯10.009%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 136 of the 139 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 136 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rcbookscom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 139 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Oct 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,020 views53 reactions1 Starread 25 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤38💘6🔥6🍾1🎉1🦄1

23 Oct 2026, 12:01 UTC≈2,510 views58 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

За те недели, пока выходили главы повести Анери «И Поглотит Нас Морок: За гранью сна», мы сильно привязались к героям, особенно — к Баюну, который оказался совсем не жутким, а очень мудрым и с присущим всем учёным котам чувством юмора. 🐱🎓 😬 Мы очень переживали за Ладу и Верею, но ещё сильнее — за отношения между Ладой и Волотом. Как думаете, в финале они будут жить долго и счастливо, или Морок возьмёт своё? Судя по …

❤40🔥9❤‍🔥6🥰2💘1

22 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC≈2,780 views71 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

👻 Нагоняем жути с новой аудиопостановкой по книге «Кали. Зов Тьмы: Когда мёртвые говорят». Вспоминаем недавно вышедшие первые главы. Если уже послушали, как вам вайб? 🌹 Какой цвет у боли? Алый, как стекающая по безвольным рукам жизнь. Какой цвет у памяти? Как застывшая кровь. Эти руки больше никогда не взлетят радостно, как две птицы, чтобы обнять, прижать к себе и защитить от всего мира. Какой цвет у ночных кошмаро…

❤51🥰11🔥7❤‍🔥1💘1

22 Oct 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,870 views50 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

🐘 Индия никогда не отпустит нас… 🌚 Калькутта зовёт. В новых главах аудиопостановки по книге Виры Лин «Кали. Зов Тьмы: Когда мёртвые говорят» Амала понимает, что Индия не отпустит её, и эту связь можно разорвать кровью или смертью. Сначала у неё отняли Амрита, теперь пропал Киран: любимый брат последовал обратно в ад по своей воле, повинуясь зову. Сестра отправится следом. Что окажется сильнее: любовь или ненависть? …

❤38🔥7❤‍🔥3💘2

21 Oct 2026, 13:36 UTC≈3,220 views150 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

🥳🎁 Сегодня — особенный день: во всех мирах, созданных ею, чистое небо, никаких теней, туманов и мороков. Секрет этого дня — день рождения Алисы, создательницы таких разных и удивительных вселенных. «Секрет Небес» с продолжениями. «Арканум». «Тени Сентфора». «И Поглотит Нас Морок». Свет и тьма в множестве проявлений, десятки ярких персонажей, давно ставших для фэндома Клуба Романтики зримыми, живыми, любимыми, родными…

❤96🔥24💘23❤‍🔥6🥰1

20 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC≈3,470 views69 reactions1 Starread 25 October 2026
Photo

👱🏻‍♀️Ладе из нашей книги «И Поглотит Нас Морок: За гранью сна» ради спасения родной сестры Вереи через многое пришлось пройти. Родная деревня окружена смертоносным туманом. Живой душе не пробиться сквозь морок, если не заручиться поддержкой хорошего проводника. Тогда выход найдётся! 👣 Готовы помочь Ладе пройти сквозь лабиринт, миновать опасные туманы, избежать всех ловушек и укрыться или в избушке Волота, под его за…

🔥41❤16🥰8💘3❤‍🔥1

20 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC≈3,400 views50 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

🌞 Перед финалом истории морок окончательно рассеялся, и стало казаться Ладе, что теперь-то уж беда окончательно покинет их дом — и Верея станет прежней, и матушка будет чаще улыбаться, и знаки внимания Волота перерастут в нечто большее. 🐱 И кот, о котором столько недоброго говорили и которым так пугали, — даже он станет совсем домашним, чтобы на печи лежать, счастье в доме охранять, ну и блины со сметаной лопать. Но…

🔥31❤13🥰3❤‍🔥2💘1

19 Oct 2026, 14:16 UTC≈3,860 views76 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤45🔥17🥰11👏2💘1

18 Oct 2026, 10:05 UTC≈4,060 views63 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

🐘 Наш детектив доволен как слон. Или как дракон, потому что разгадал загадку. Имя ключевого персонажа — Лилу. 🐉 Она была танцовщицей в клубе и подругой Вики. Лилу довольно экстравагантная особа, на её коже множество татуировок, одна из них — стального цвета дракон. Исчезновение Лилу не только объединило в едином расследовании Вики и Люцифера, но и стало тем важным событием, вокруг которого выстроена вся история. 🌂 …

❤43❤‍🔥8🥰8🔥3💘1

17 Oct 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,950 views74 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

🕵️‍♂️❤ Осенний детектив снова в деле! Сегодня он разгадывает дело, в котором ему станет ясно сразу всё, если он узнает имя ключевого свидетеля. 🔐 🔎📖 Перед вами — важный отрывок из книги RC Books «Секрет Небес: Кровь и неон» Аме Ли. В нём идёт речь о весьма важном для сюжета всей истории человеке, связанном с главными героями. У этого персонажа есть довольно приметная татуировка, и если вы правильно назовёте, что на …

🥰43❤20🔥7❤‍🔥2💘2

16 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC≈4,410 views84 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥46❤17🥰10❤‍🔥9💘2

15 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC≈4,400 views101 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

🪷 😡 Мы долго ждали подходящего заката над Нилом, чтобы он по-настоящему стал красным. Наконец идеальный фон — просто песня! — получен, и «Песнь о Красном Ниле: Под тенью Змея» Энн Брэмфорд из нашего нового предзаказа, который завершился в этот понедельник, готова раскрыть все свои лучшие стороны. Очень скоро на сайте возобновятся продажи наших новинок — «Секрет Небес: Десятый круг», «Теодора: Хороший солдат» и «Песн…

❤68🔥19💘10❤‍🔥3💔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @rcbookscom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@rcbookscom edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 October 2026
Most recent edit
9 October 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTCAnonymous Poll1,270 voters approx.

Какую конфету выберете?

  1. 🔥Люцифер («Пламя Преисподней»)39%
  2. ❄️Малек Синнер («Absolute Zero»)22%
  3. 💙Каин («Ледяное сердце»)46%
  4. 🌪Сет («Песчаная буря»)20%
  5. 💎Йонас («Холодный расчёт»)11%
  6. 🍁Рафаил («Осенний этюд»)24%
  7. ☘️Киллиан («Ирландский шторм»)11%

The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RC Books Stories” (@rcbookscom), 47,921 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rcbookscom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.