Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لینک آزمونهای تستی وکالت

Channel

لینک آزمونهای تستی وکالت

@link_e_test

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,841subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001635458943
TypeChannel
Username@link_e_test
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/link_e_test

Growth

2,8332,8412,83727 August 2026 — 2,833 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,833 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,834 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,841 subscribers27 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,832–2,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 02:042,841+7
27 Aug 2026, 23:432,834+1
27 Aug 2026, 16:002,833no change
27 Aug 2026, 15:452,833first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.09%
avg views ÷ 2,841 subscribers
Avg views / post
173
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held19 (9 November 202524 August 2026)
Views total346
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2961.7%
👏1021.3%
👍714.9%
🥴12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC172 viewsread 27 August 2026

تفاوت قرار مجرمیت با قرار رسیدگی در چیه؟ جواب رو بفرستین پی وی @lawyer_1061

Signed خوشا گمنامی

24 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC174 viewsread 27 August 2026
Poll

قرار رسیدگی در چه موردی صادر میشود؟

  1. بعداز اتمام تحقیقات در دادسرا توسط بازپرس صادر میشود40%
  2. بعداز اتمام تحقیقات در دادگاه و اعتقاد بازپرس بر مجرمیت متهم20%
  3. بعداز اتمام تحقیقات در دادگاه کیفری دو و اعتقاد دادگاه بر مجرمیت متهم9%
  4. بعداز اتمام تحقیقات در دادگاه کیفری یک و اعتقاد دادگاه بر مجرمیت متهم31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed خوشا گمنامی

2 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC≈1,010 views3 reactionsread 27 August 2026

امضا کنید: کارزار اصلاح فرایند نمایش اطلاعات حساس؛ درخواست صیانت از حریم خصوصی و امنیت شغلی وکلا در سامانهٔ شفافیت https://www.karzar.net/330357

👍3

Signed خوشا گمنامی

31 May 2026, 05:36 UTC≈1,410 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026

سلام خدمت همراهان محترم کانال امیدوارم حال دلتون خوب باشه مطالعه مستمر رمز موفقیت شماست فرصت موفقیت رو از خودتون نگیرید⚖❤

5

Signed خوشا گمنامی

24 Feb 2026, 07:17 UTC≈5,360 viewsread 27 August 2026
File

دفترچه راهنمایی ثبتنام آزمون سردفتری ۱۴۰۴

Signed خوشا گمنامی

24 Feb 2026, 07:12 UTC≈5,340 viewsread 27 August 2026

✴️ آغاز ثبت نام آزمون سردفتری ۱۴۰۴ 🔸ثبت‌نام آزمون سردفتری اسناد رسمی در سایت سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور آغاز شده و تا دهم اسفند ادامه دارد. 🔸آزمون روز ۲۶ تیرماه سال آینده برگزار می‌شود و هزینه ثبت‌نام در آن ششصد و سی هزار تومان است. 🔗 جزییات کامل به همراه دفترچه راهنما و نحوه ثبت‌نام را در لینک زیر ببینید: https://www.ekhtebar.ir/?p=132705 ✔️ پایگاه خبری اختبار @Ekhtebar ▫️توییتر ▫️ایتا ▫️اینستاگرام ▫️سروش ▫️بله▫️وب

Signed خوشا گمنامی

23 Jan 2026, 08:23 UTC≈1,830 views0 reactionsread 27 August 2026

💥نتایج آزمون وکالت مرکز وکلای قوه قضاییه ۱۴۰۴اعلام شد ◀️لینک🔽 https://result2.sanjesh.org/RSEmp/KrnVokala_Ghaza140410/140410

Signed خوشا گمنامی

16 Dec 2025, 20:08 UTC≈2,190 views11 reactionsread 27 August 2026

مانده تا برف زمین آب شود. 🍂🌺🍃💫

11

Signed خوشا گمنامی

13 Dec 2025, 18:31 UTC≈2,620 views3 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

قبول شدین؟

  1. بله😍19%
  2. نه50%
  3. شرکت نکردم30%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

Signed خوشا گمنامی

13 Dec 2025, 18:14 UTC≈3,730 views0 reactionsread 27 August 2026

✴️ نتایج آزمون وکالت ۱۴۰۴ کانون های وکلای دادگستری اعلام شد 🔹نتایج آزمون وکالت ۱۴۰۴ کانون های وکلای دادگستری در وب سایت سازمان سنجش به نشانی sanjesh.org اعلام شد. 🔗 لینک اعلام نتایج: https://result2.sanjesh.org/RSEmp/KrnEskoda140409/140409

Signed خوشا گمنامی

13 Dec 2025, 06:29 UTC≈2,460 views1 reactionsread 27 August 2026
File

سوالات مرکز وکلا 1404

1

Signed خوشا گمنامی

12 Dec 2025, 19:12 UTC≈2,170 viewsread 27 August 2026
Poll

آزمون مرکز چطور بود؟

  1. سخت بود32%
  2. خوب بود12%
  3. متوسط بود30%
  4. شرکت نکردم26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed خوشا گمنامی

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @link_e_test. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTCAnonymous Poll80 voters

قرار رسیدگی در چه موردی صادر میشود؟

  1. بعداز اتمام تحقیقات در دادسرا توسط بازپرس صادر میشود40%
  2. بعداز اتمام تحقیقات در دادگاه و اعتقاد بازپرس بر مجرمیت متهم20%
  3. بعداز اتمام تحقیقات در دادگاه کیفری دو و اعتقاد دادگاه بر مجرمیت متهم9%
  4. بعداز اتمام تحقیقات در دادگاه کیفری یک و اعتقاد دادگاه بر مجرمیت متهم31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Dec 2025, 18:31 UTCAnonymous Poll529 voters

قبول شدین؟

  1. بله😍19%
  2. نه50%
  3. شرکت نکردم30%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Dec 2025, 19:12 UTCAnonymous Poll335 voters

آزمون مرکز چطور بود؟

  1. سخت بود32%
  2. خوب بود12%
  3. متوسط بود30%
  4. شرکت نکردم26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Nov 2025, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz596 voters

در کدامیک استناد به سند رسمی یا حکم دادگاه لازم است؟

  1. تصرف عدوانی27%
  2. مزاحمت ملکی8%
  3. ممانعت از حق8%
  4. خلع ید58%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Nov 2025, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz611 voters

هزینه دادرسی در دعوی تصرف عدوانی ....و در دعوی خلع ید .....

  1. غیر مالی _ مالی33%
  2. مالی _ مالی16%
  3. غیر مالی _ غیر مالی39%
  4. مالی _ غیر مالی12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Nov 2025, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz645 voters

در دعوی رفع ممانعت از حق ؛ منظور از حق چیست؟

  1. تمام حقوق مالی10%
  2. حقوق مالی و غیر مالی29%
  3. مطلق اعیان10%
  4. حق انتفاع و حق ارتفاق51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تغییر رتبه کنکور(تضمینی)-صندلی پزشکی
@taghirrotbee · 1,613,494
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 3 September 2026
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️
@LAAWW · 45,617
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لینک آزمونهای تستی وکالت” (@link_e_test), 2,841 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/link_e_test.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.