Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LINUX DO Channel

Channel

LINUX DO Channel

@linux_do_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,699subscribers

+1,463 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002035446470
TypeChannel
Username@linux_do_channel
Descriptionhttps://linux.do 论坛的话题更新通知频道。
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/linux_do_channel

Growth

35,23636,69935,967.57 August 2026 — 35,236 subscribers7 August 2026 — 35,236 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,274 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,302 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,342 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,432 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,496 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,527 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,607 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,685 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,780 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,831 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,876 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,941 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,014 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,060 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,142 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,215 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,264 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,325 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,375 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,412 subscribers30 August 2026 — 36,435 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,498 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,543 subscribers2 September 2026 — 36,604 subscribers4 September 2026 — 36,699 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 28 days, net +1,463. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,017–36,918 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 15:0036,699+95
2 Sept 2026, 23:2336,604+61
1 Sept 2026, 19:5436,543+45
31 Aug 2026, 21:2536,498+63
30 Aug 2026, 21:0736,435+23
29 Aug 2026, 18:3836,412+37
28 Aug 2026, 19:3736,375+50
27 Aug 2026, 17:4636,325+61
26 Aug 2026, 19:0236,264+49
25 Aug 2026, 16:5336,215+73
24 Aug 2026, 14:2536,142+82
22 Aug 2026, 18:4436,060+46
21 Aug 2026, 11:2836,014+73
20 Aug 2026, 12:0335,941+65
19 Aug 2026, 11:4535,876+45
18 Aug 2026, 13:1535,831+51
17 Aug 2026, 14:1635,780+95
16 Aug 2026, 05:4835,685+78
14 Aug 2026, 14:0835,607+80
13 Aug 2026, 06:5535,527first reading

Engagement

1,280 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.107%
avg views ÷ 36,699 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.2
1,240 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.434%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,240
of 1,280 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 1,240 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held1,280 (7 August 20267 September 2026)
Views total48,575
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
454,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 00:55 UTC9 viewsread 7 September 2026

泡芙小圆手 (@tnanko_haha) 在 6 astra快是快,就是后端不动脑思考 中发帖 大佬们有没有遇到过这个情况,如何解决呢?

7 Sept 2026, 00:54 UTC13 viewsread 7 September 2026

@jing0306 在 如何查看是哪一个帖子被举报的? 中发帖 这个是另外一个号的,如何查看是那一条被举报的内容呢? 如何联系管理呢? [chrome_l2Z41jj4fq]

7 Sept 2026, 00:54 UTC15 viewsread 7 September 2026

@xiaoyu6666 在 有那种快过期的team工作空间吗 中发帖 有那种快过期的team工作空间吗,各位佬,我很有诚意!

7 Sept 2026, 00:51 UTC24 viewsread 7 September 2026

zhangn 在 实在不理解为啥L站有帖子推bybit 中发帖 跟风申请了,发现就1%返现之外,没别的优惠,折腾半天,在灰色的小字链接点进去,看到一堆MCxx的编号,再仔细看,好像是特定商户消费才返现10%,这不忽悠人吗?大多数是旅游,酒店,飞机的。

7 Sept 2026, 00:50 UTC30 viewsread 7 September 2026

@xiaoyu6666 在 【收team】7,8,9,10的临期都要,高价回收 中发帖 【收team】7,8,9,10的临期都要,高价回收,价格可谈,后面的日期也可以来谈

7 Sept 2026, 00:48 UTC34 viewsread 7 September 2026

Zane (@Zanen) 在 360:A\赶紧有多远滚多远,老子现在用GPT6了 中发帖 今天上班例行更新一下vscode的插件,结果360直接把Claude Code 2.1.260的Claude.exe判为木马了,可惜当时弹窗拦截报毒的时候没截图,只有这个了,我笑死,360圈粉了 [image] [image] [image]

7 Sept 2026, 00:46 UTC36 viewsread 7 September 2026

@Bethany 在 求分享,大家现在在用什么 AI?求 GPT、Claude 性价比方案 中发帖 来向各位大神请教,现在日常各位都在用哪些 AI 工具? 想使用 ChatGPT、Claude,官方订阅成本高,注册支付也有门槛。求靠谱、性价比高的使用渠道,有踩坑经历也欢迎提醒,谢谢大家。

7 Sept 2026, 00:42 UTC50 viewsread 7 September 2026

小许 (@XiaoXuRa) 在 震惊,GPT现在可以退出已经封禁的空间了 中发帖 [image] 我记得半个月前还不行的,一直加载中,但是今天寻思点一下试试,发现可以退出了

7 Sept 2026, 00:41 UTC53 viewsread 7 September 2026

行思渐远 (@6868888) 在 GPT6 sub2api额度估算 中发帖 以前5.6sol sub2api,基本在2000$-2500$/周上下浮动. 现在GPT 6,sub2api,已用百分之50,消耗$731刀,一周就是一周大概就是1460刀。 [image] 这个已消耗也不全是用GPT6,有时候还会用一下GPT 5.6 模型,所以只能粗略估计,仅供参考.

7 Sept 2026, 00:41 UTC48 viewsread 7 September 2026

JXMs 在 ollama的deepseek v4 flash真的没降智吗? 中发帖 俺刚才让K3写了一份prompt交给dsv4f执行,试了两遍都是在工作树来回打转,完全没有任何进展。俺生气的不行,就直接掏了d老师官方api推,结果一次就ok了,也不打转,一击即中。 ollama的d老师真的没降智吗?这智力感觉还不如commandcode的GOAT :bili_020:

7 Sept 2026, 00:40 UTC46 viewsread 7 September 2026

Frank Darking 在 zcode号被封了?还是服务器炸了。 中发帖 昨天领了免费额度,搞了一整天逆向,早上起来号被强退了·····登录不上去了

7 Sept 2026, 00:39 UTC45 viewsread 7 September 2026

@MeiCai 在 Team订阅该怎么避免GPT封子号呢?已经被封三次了 中发帖 可能是母号花钱的原因一直没事,但是子号我拉一个封一个,不管是本地用还是CPA都坚持不到一周,被封后我就踢掉再拉新的,但是这种情况多了之后怕连累母号,该怎么办呢?

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,280 posts we hold for @linux_do_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

NodeSeek官方频道
@nodeseekc · 35,906
#1
科技圈🎗在花频道📮
@zaihuapd · 280,522
#2
ChatGPT / AI新闻聚合
@AI_News_CN · 21,580
#3
免费vpn丨正义的反派
@pokemon521 · 68,583
#4
机界
@serveruniverse · 1,407
#5
AI Copilot
@AI_Copilot_Channel · 10,554
#6
折腾啥
@zhetengsha · 48,646
#7
COALCLOUD(NEW)
@coalcloud · 6,071
#8
AKILE NOTICE
@akile_notice · 18,501
#9
LoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 71,413
#10
BestVM公告栏
@BestVmCloud · 2,794
#11
Project X Channel
@projectXtls · 29,900
#12
VPS信号旗播报
@vps_xhq · 49,371
#13
2.5次元日常 🍉
@acgdaily · 16,474
#14
虚妄猫IDC_频道
@kuaileceshi2 · 3,718
#15
PT风向旗
@Ptfxq · 17,119
#16
Faker的个人频道
@wtfbugtoday · 2,939
#17
小声逼逼
@me888888888888 · 49,394
#18
Newlearnerの自留地
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,021
#19
学习强国公告
@UOVZNEWS · 5,045
#20
NodeSeek新帖推送
@hostloc2tg · 4,420
#21
HostMonit-全球主机补货通知
@hostmonit · 10,404
#22
主机补货监控 | vps补货监控
@vps_track_share · 3,425
#23
Yummy 😋
@GodlyNews1 · 68,526
#24
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 160,314
#25
哇沃主机
@wawowiki · 2,691
#26
哪吒监控公告板
@nezhanews · 3,549
#27
蓝点网订阅频道
@landiansub · 44,267
#28
竹新社
@tnews365 · 157,625
#29
DCI & Hax & Vc 库存监控
@hax_seats · 3,003
#30
wap.ac
@wap_ac · 3,220
#31
YxVM‘s NOTICE
@yxvmcom · 2,468
#32
DMIT交易/拼车/补货
@DMITstock · 10,698
#33
帕斯云频道
@pasyun1 · 2,012
#34

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

免费vpn丨正义的反派
@pokemon521 · 68,583
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 21 August 2026
Matsuridayo GitHub
@MatsuriDayo · 45,305
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
NodeSeek官方频道
@nodeseekc · 35,906
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 2 September 2026
重生之我在 TG做内置代理
@chongshengvpn · 71,061
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LINUX DO Channel” (@linux_do_channel), 36,699 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linux_do_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.