Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,330–6,447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 07:58
6,343
-9
13 Sept 2026, 21:21
6,352
-7
9 Sept 2026, 18:01
6,359
-8
4 Sept 2026, 11:20
6,367
-4
31 Aug 2026, 14:03
6,371
-9
28 Aug 2026, 21:16
6,380
-6
25 Aug 2026, 18:34
6,386
-9
23 Aug 2026, 03:18
6,395
-10
19 Aug 2026, 07:37
6,405
-6
16 Aug 2026, 17:52
6,411
-8
13 Aug 2026, 11:39
6,419
-7
10 Aug 2026, 14:37
6,426
-7
7 Aug 2026, 15:24
6,433
+5
7 Aug 2026, 09:31
6,428
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
515 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
143
27.8%
🔥
143
27.8%
🤣
81
15.7%
👍
62
12.0%
😢
34
6.60%
💯
11
2.14%
😍
8
1.55%
👌
5
0.971%
🕊
5
0.971%
😁
5
0.971%
🤔
5
0.971%
🥰
5
0.971%
🤝
3
0.583%
⚡
2
0.388%
🐳
2
0.388%
🦄
1
0.194%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 515 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Боже, сохрани меня от идеальности этих женщин, которые в роскошной полу-голой форме заходят в кофейню после пробежки. Волос к волосу, ни капли пота, овсянка и раф на безлактозном…
Почему я во время и после пробежки всегда похожа на потное гавномыло?
А разговоров то было!
В итоге дел на 30 минут) 🐟
Короче, техника элементарная. Дальше будет круче. На очереди джинсовка. Пишите, если хотите процесс увидеть 👍🏼
Становлюсь любителем мелких собак 🐕
Никогда они мне особенно не нравились. Хотя в подростковом возрасте был Той-терьер и, конечно, вся семья его очень любила.
Но вот мне отдали малышку на передержку. И буквально за 2-3 дня у меня случилась с ней синергия.
Ключевой плюс размера - удобство хозяина. Можно этого компаньона с собой брать везде. Я с ней в детский сад захожу смело, пока остальные собаки на привязи рядом с …
Что меня дернуло прочитать это четырехлетнему ребенку?!
Наверное я как то иначе помнила этот рассказ.
Рассуждала, что ключевая идея - бескорыстная преданность животного. Ну и возможность заглянуть за кулисы цирка. Да и Пушкина уже наизусть выучили, вроде и с Чеховым уже можно познакомить.
Познакомила 😵💫
По итогу мы хоронили гуся 🪿 как родного, офигели как мальчик скармливал собаке мясо на нитке и тянул назад. И к…
Пишу как фанат Юрия Норштейна и даже больше Франчески Ярбусовой (его супруга и художница, которая собственно и рисовала его мультфильмы).
Её персонажи и детали оставили неизгладимое впечатление в моей душе.
Если вы не смотрели «Сказка сказок», очень надо)
А на фото часы «Ёжик Слава».
Они выпущены к 50-летию легендарного мультфильма "Ёжик в тумане" компанией Слава совместно с Союзмультфильмом и сетью Alltime.
Оснаще…
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Понравился сарафан от
Surepka 🩵
Фактмчечки по крою - это копия крестьянского костюма XIX века. Только материал - деним.
Создатель и дизайнер — Дарья Попова. Бренд базируется в Санкт‑Петербурге, у них есть шоурум на Тележной, но доставка конечно есть по всей РФ 📦
Тут интересно то, что
крестьянский костюм изначально был максимально функциональным. При этом команда избегает «музейности», все сделано так, чтобы не выг…
Сегодня праздник у девчат. Маша сама доехала до сада на велике 🚴
Велосипед мы купили позавчера, а вчера с ней позанимался профессиональный детский тренер. Всего один час и ребенок поехал.
До этого (в день покупки), сначала я пыталась объяснить как крутить педали, потом Дима честно пытался. Оба мы начали выходить из себя примерно секунд за 30 🤣👍, потому что она упорно крутила назад. Для меня это был шок, потому что с…
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие классные костюмы и вещи для активного времени появились у любимых FitBomb ❗️
Я уже писала про этот российский бренд именно спортивной одежды (основан в 2019 году в Нижнем Новгороде Анной Клюевой).🫶
Он строится вокруг идеи «спорта для себя»: то есть радости движения.
Размерный ряд охватывает диапазон от XS до 4XL, а крой прорабатывается отдельно для больших размеров с учётом нюансов посадки.
Это означает, что …
❤11🔥5👌4
Signed Lisichka
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @lisa_proshvirnulas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Серебряный Дождь @Silverrainradio · 42,154 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Елена Новоселова @novoselova_time · 21,708 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лиса прошвырнулась” (@lisa_proshvirnulas), 6,343 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lisa_proshvirnulas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.