Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for живые кости

Channel

живые кости

@livingbones_tg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

18,488subscribers

-62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001954974050
TypeChannel
Username@livingbones_tg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/livingbones_tg

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,11518,65118,3837 August 2026 — 18,550 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,550 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,546 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,523 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,510 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,494 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,486 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,469 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,458 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,424 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,403 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,371 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,336 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,340 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,325 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,301 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,279 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,275 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,256 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,225 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,219 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,188 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,170 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,146 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,126 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,115 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,166 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,204 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,247 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,241 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,210 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,254 subscribers18 September 2026 — 18,202 subscribers25 September 2026 — 18,369 subscribers4 October 2026 — 18,440 subscribers8 October 2026 — 18,404 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,373 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,370 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,387 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,457 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,492 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,480 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,469 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,561 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,571 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,563 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,545 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,604 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,640 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,651 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,615 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,597 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,580 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,562 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,544 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,503 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,502 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,492 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,488 subscribers18,4887 August 20265 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,035–18,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 12:0818,488-4
4 Nov 2026, 11:0718,492-10
3 Nov 2026, 11:4818,502-1
2 Nov 2026, 11:3418,503-41
1 Nov 2026, 09:3418,544-18
31 Oct 2026, 07:3618,562-18
30 Oct 2026, 10:5418,580-17
29 Oct 2026, 08:2718,597-18
28 Oct 2026, 05:1918,615-36
27 Oct 2026, 02:0518,651+11
26 Oct 2026, 01:5618,640+36
24 Oct 2026, 23:5918,604+59
24 Oct 2026, 00:3918,545-18
22 Oct 2026, 21:5918,563-8
21 Oct 2026, 21:3118,571+10
20 Oct 2026, 17:4418,561+92
19 Oct 2026, 17:0618,469-11
18 Oct 2026, 13:5018,480-12
17 Oct 2026, 12:4118,492+35
16 Oct 2026, 15:0718,457first reading

Engagement

107 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.17%
avg views ÷ 18,488 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,510
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 107 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held107 (3 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total16,621
Reactions total1,062
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 03:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50m 22s
Average length
3m 36s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14,113 reactions across 107 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54205751278866384268,02456.9%
💔6,08943.1%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 19:42 UTC581 views98 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Делитесь любыми итогами дня в чате, от сегодняшнего рациона до своего самочувствия 🌟 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ 🖤🤩- был хороший день 🖤 🖤 💔 - был плохой день 🖤 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️

💔53custom 542057512788663842645

4 Nov 2026, 15:54 UTC≈1,080 views8 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🌟 toxic советы как разорвать отношения: 💔с ах#евшими подругами 💔с нелюбимыми парнями 💔с наглыми родственниками

💔4custom 54205751278866384264

3 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,610 views45 reactionsread 5 November 2026

я имела ввиду не своих а любые сохраненки тощие ну пж лентяи

custom 542057512788663842645

3 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,660 views23 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⭐⭐⭐ 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ⭐⭐⭐⭐🔤🔤 ⭐⭐⭐⭐🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ⭐⭐⭐ 🔤"скрыть рпп невозможно"🔤 🔤 обмануть не своих родителей — обмануть свою голову 🔤 голод от 3х недель 🔤 как правильно жбшить 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 542057512788663842618💔5

3 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,640 views50 reactionsread 5 November 2026

поскидуйте в коммы мега тощих любых я у вас фотки поворую

custom 542057512788663842640💔10

3 Nov 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,720 views142 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

очень красивый рисунок в твиттере нашла😭😭

custom 5420575127886638426112💔30

2 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC≈1,930 views124 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🦴📄#мемы📄🖤🖤🖤

custom 5420575127886638426101💔23

2 Nov 2026, 07:40 UTC≈2,000 views213 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 🌟 - идеал 💔 - перебор 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 🤩🤩🤩#кости🤩🤩🤩

custom 5420575127886638426129💔84

1 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTC≈1,600 views107 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 542057512788663842681💔26

1 Nov 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,410 views216 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 🌟 - идеал 💔 - перебор 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 🤩🤩🤩#кости🤩🤩🤩

custom 5420575127886638426122💔94

1 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,390 views36 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

💀 «Ноги у тебя толстые». Фраза, с которой началось мое РПП болото. ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Мне 20. Рост 180, а вес - 5?.. Я живу с РПП 9 лет. Тревожное расстройство, похудение на психотропных и голоде до истощения, молекула и минерал, литры кофе. От травм в спорте и веса в 72 кг до обмороков, панических атак и цели в 39 кг. Самый красивый тг канал для рппшников. ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Сдохнет или похудеет? Узнаешь тут 🫥

💔34custom 54205751278866384262

2 Sept 2026, 17:41 UTC965 views147 reactionsread 3 September 2026

привет наколдуйте пж чтоб меня не депортировали я заебалась от такого количества стресса😅

💔94custom 542057512788663842653

Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @livingbones_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 12 posts on @livingbones_tg as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“живые кости” (@livingbones_tg), 18,488 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/livingbones_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.