Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SAT ACT AP IELTS TOEFL Exams

Channel

SAT ACT AP IELTS TOEFL Exams

@lo_6j

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,734subscribers

-668 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003656886354
TypeChannel
Username@lo_6j
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lo_6j

Topic

Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@lo_6j/281 · this entry4 Jun 2026, 19:21 UTC@gmat4svu/4584 Jun 2026, 19:22 UTC1.00under a minute
@lo_6j/287 · this entry8 Jun 2026, 14:28 UTC@gmat4svu/4648 Jun 2026, 14:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@lo_6j/288 · this entry9 Jun 2026, 19:06 UTC@gmat4svu/4659 Jun 2026, 19:06 UTC1.00under a minute
@lo_6j/296 · this entry16 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC@gmat4svu/47316 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@gmat4svu7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @lo_6j — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,7347,4027,0687 August 2026 — 7,402 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,402 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,397 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,343 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,300 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,239 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,190 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,116 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,063 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,026 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,972 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,905 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,827 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,787 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,734 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -668. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,634–7,502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:226,734-53
14 Sept 2026, 09:226,787-40
10 Sept 2026, 22:376,827-78
5 Sept 2026, 15:016,905-67
1 Sept 2026, 12:536,972-54
29 Aug 2026, 04:577,026-37
26 Aug 2026, 13:527,063-53
23 Aug 2026, 23:187,116-74
20 Aug 2026, 11:137,190-49
17 Aug 2026, 10:047,239-61
13 Aug 2026, 18:187,300-43
10 Aug 2026, 15:467,343-54
7 Aug 2026, 23:347,397-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:317,402no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:237,402first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC25 viewsread 20 August 2026

🚨 EXAM SEASON IS HERE – FINAL CALL August DSAT is DAYS away. If you're not booked yet, you're officially behind. 📅 WHAT'S COMING UP FAST · August DSAT – days away · September ACT – booking open · IELTS – available · Other exams? DM me. ⏳ FOR PENDING ORDERS · Complete payment NOW · No holds — your spot is not guaranteed until payment is confirmed 🚨 LAST CHANCE FOR NEW BOOKINGS · Limited spots remain · Pri…

12 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC24 viewsread 20 August 2026

The DSAT lk payment period is approaching on the 15th, and no date extension will be granted. Due to a high volume of bookings, last-minute purchases may result in receiving a different version as sufficient preparation was not made. Distinct versions exist for every center and each candidate. Waiting until the final hour will incur additional costs. The payment method is cryptocurrency, utilized for security and ano…

7 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC58 viewsread 20 August 2026

📢 EXAM UPDATE – AUGUST DSAT is approaching fast. Time is running out. If you haven't secured your spot yet, you're running out of time to make a decision. ⏳ FOR PENDING ORDERS If you've already started the booking process but haven't completed payment: · Complete payment ASAP · I will not hold spots indefinitely · If I don't hear from you soon, your spot is released 🚨 FOR THOSE STILL THINKING · Prices have…

16 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC54 viewsread 20 August 2026

July ACT test actual material booking is open! Please accept our apologies for the delayed update, as we were reviewing other relevant exam services. Bitcoin/Usdt only ❗️ Dm @RICK7743 if you’re ready to purchase

23 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🎉🎉CONGRATULATIONS TO STUDENTS WHO TOOK THE DSAT WITH US 🎉🎉 Enjoy your scores! With that being said , bookings for the AUGUST DSAT is now open Contact: 🌐 @RICK7743 ✅

12 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 20 August 2026

🚨 FRIDAY – LAST CALL FOR ACT Tomorrow is the exam. This is for serious people only. If you are not ready to pay and secure right now, do not text me. --- ⚠️ READ BEFORE MESSAGING · No questions. No "how does it work." No "can I see proof." · Payment must be made immediately — no holds, no "I'll pay in an hour" · Price is final — no negotiations this close to exam If any of that doesn't work for you, keep scrol…

9 Jun 2026, 19:06 UTC150 viewsread 20 August 2026

⭐️ ACT – JUNE 13 – DEADLINE: THURSDAY Thursday is the cutoff. If you are not booked and paid by Thursday, you are not getting in. --- ⛔️AFTER THURSDAY · I will not respond to any messages · No exceptions · Not Friday. Not the night before the exam. Not ever for this test date.⭐️ --- ✅WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW · Price increases closer to exam — Thursday is your last chance at current rates · Booking confirmed ONLY…

8 Jun 2026, 14:28 UTC144 viewsread 20 August 2026

⭐️ACT – JUNE 13, 2026 – BOOKING NOW OPEN⭐️ The official ACT test date is June 13. If you are taking this exam, booking is now open.⭐️ ⭐️IMPORTANT – READ BEFORE BOOKING⭐️ 1. High demand = price increase closer to exam The closer we get to June 13, the higher the price. Book now at the lowest rate.⭐️ 2. Booking confirmed ONLY with payment No holds. No "I'll pay later." First paid, first served.⭐️ 4. You are res…

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lo_6j. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SAT ACT AP IELTS TOEFL Exams” (@lo_6j), 6,734 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lo_6j.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.