Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for localhost

Channel

localhost

@localhost_ir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

10,589subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001913882395
TypeChannel
Username@localhost_ir
DescriptionDonate: Trc20 TPz9YxSBN89v2tKSZb6nhPMsfjzcd3uiQL USDT(bep20) 0x4BA6C84Be9cD07C5C6E44eB497c155E97d288F31 TON UQC_i-Usx6h-J-lBS-9nmD2yyPgvftcJQMVi3UEYvCoz-sVH Ads @localhost_Advertisement [email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/localhost_ir

Growth

10,53210,60210,5676 August 2026 — 10,543 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,542 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,532 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,540 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,542 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,587 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,597 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,589 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,584 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,581 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,585 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,602 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,596 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,595 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,598 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,589 subscribers10,5896 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,522–10,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 07:1810,589-9
20 Aug 2026, 21:5810,598+3
19 Aug 2026, 22:0810,595-1
18 Aug 2026, 18:3710,596-6
17 Aug 2026, 22:1210,602+17
16 Aug 2026, 21:2710,585+4
15 Aug 2026, 15:2210,581-3
14 Aug 2026, 05:1610,584-5
12 Aug 2026, 23:0810,589-8
12 Aug 2026, 01:4210,597+10
11 Aug 2026, 04:1110,587+45
10 Aug 2026, 04:1710,542+2
9 Aug 2026, 00:5110,540+8
8 Aug 2026, 03:2610,532-10
7 Aug 2026, 04:5610,542-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:0210,543first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.0%
avg views ÷ 10,589 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,390
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 90 of 92 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held92 (1 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total312,180
Reactions total6,911
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,390
Videos
187
Links
811

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22m 02s
Average length
5m 31s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,840 reactions across 87 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,48036.3%
1,31419.2%
💔1,11616.3%
🔥74310.9%
👎6539.55%
🤣2663.89%
👌1642.40%
👏831.21%
210.307%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,911reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 92 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @localhost_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,190 views55 reactionsread 22 August 2026

مدیرعامل آسیاتک: مردم بی‌رویه اینترنت مصرف می‌کنند چون قیمت هر گیگ اینترنت ناچیز است. پ‌ن: از نظر آقایون اینترنت منابع ملی هستش و باید در حفظ و نگه‌داری از اون کوشا باشیم:)) مثل اماکن ملی و باستانی و طبیعی که از شهروندان درجه ۱ ورودی دریافت میکنن:)))

👏50👎41

Signed Yousef Taheri

22 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,530 views52 reactionsread 22 August 2026

۱۶۸ تا دیسلایک👀 عجب...

👎28👍15💔9

Signed Yousef Taheri

22 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈3,160 views2,020 reactionsread 22 August 2026

هیچ اپراتوری نمیتونه بزور چیزی رو فیلتر کنه! ولی میتونه درخواست بده به طور موقت ایران اکسس بشه... اگر براتون جالبه که چطوری،👍بزنید که ویس بدم.

👍892482🔥448👎195👌3

Signed Yousef Taheri

19 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,200 views26 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @webdade

Posted without readable text

👎169👍1

Signed Yousef Taheri

19 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,380 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

2

Signed Yousef Taheri

19 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC≈3,150 views51 reactionsread 22 August 2026

این چیزی که جدید مد شده همه میگن هم واقعا بنظرم خیلی سطحی نگریه! فقط فاز تخریب و موج سواری داره... برنامه نویس های ایرانی همه‌شون وایب کدر نیستن بخدا پروگرمر‌های خفن ایرانی تو خیلی از کمپانی های دنیا دارن کار میکنن که دنیا پرچاشون باز شده. حالا قبول دارم که چارتا بچه سال یا آدم غیر متخصص شدن وایب کدر و خودشون و پرزنت کردن و حالا همه فکر‌میکنن که ایرانیا همه وایب کدینگ میکنن فقط🤷🏻‍♂️

👍474

Signed Yousef Taheri

19 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC≈3,220 views40 reactionsread 22 August 2026

تجربه ثابت کرده که اگر کانسپت رو ندونیم، باید حفظ کنیم! اگر حفظ کنیم، یعنی درک عمیق صورت نگرفته. و اینجا، همونجاییه که نمیتونی از خودت توقع داشته باشی که متخصص باشی و خودت رو توی اون جایگاه ببینی! چرا؟ چون قدرت تحلیل نداری؛ با حفظ کردن درکی از کانسپت نداری که بخوای تحلیلی از موضوع داشته باشی.

31👍9

Signed Yousef Taheri

19 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC≈3,080 views51 reactionsread 22 August 2026

نوشیدنی HYPE zero sugar energy خیلی آشغاله. مزه جلبک‌های بلااستفاده کف رودخونه میده.

👍452👎2👏2

Signed Yousef Taheri

19 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC≈2,990 views44 reactionsread 22 August 2026

احتمالا مهندسای کامپیوتر، تنها اشخاصی باشن که با کافئین ممکنه از بین برن و یا به اصطلاح اوردوز کنن. Jesus, save the computer engineers😁

👍404

Signed Yousef Taheri

19 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC≈3,140 views41 reactionsread 22 August 2026

همونطور که الان تو این شرایط، اینترنت بین‌الملل یک جوک محسوب میشه! بسته ها VPN نامحدود استندآپ کمدی محسوب میشه:) مورد داشتیم طرف ۶۰ گیگ اختصاص داده😄

👍392

Signed Yousef Taheri

18 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC≈3,590 views43 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

شب بخیر

👍31💔91👌1🔥1

Signed Yousef Taheri

18 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈2,900 views32 reactionsread 22 August 2026

پیشنهادم برای کسایی که مبتدی هستند و تازه برای ورود به بازار کار دارن کار میکنن یا تلاش میکنن، اپیزود 198 پادکست طبقه ۱۶ رو گوش ندن. چون بدون واقع گرایی ممکنه ته دلشون خالی شه.

26👍5👎1

Signed Yousef Taheri

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @localhost_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@localhost_ir edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 11,803 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“localhost” (@localhost_ir), 10,589 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/localhost_ir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.