Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [NEWS] Lols Anti Spam Bot

Channel

[NEWS] Lols Anti Spam Bot

@lolsAntiSpam

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,105subscribers

+1,175 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002059322166
TypeChannel
Username@lolsAntiSpam
DescriptionНовостной канал проекта @LolsBot Инструкция: https://lols.bot/docs/
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lolsAntiSpam

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,9308,1057,517.56 August 2026 — 6,930 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,932 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,945 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,952 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,973 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,990 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,982 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,004 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,005 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,021 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,050 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,072 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,121 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,187 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,192 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,221 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,252 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,279 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,309 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,321 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,342 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,371 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,395 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,105 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net +1,175. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,754–8,281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 02:598,105+710
4 Nov 2026, 02:167,395+24
1 Nov 2026, 10:287,371+29
29 Oct 2026, 18:417,342+21
26 Oct 2026, 21:157,321+12
24 Oct 2026, 03:457,309+30
21 Oct 2026, 01:477,279+27
17 Oct 2026, 18:487,252+31
14 Oct 2026, 08:447,221+29
11 Oct 2026, 00:557,192+5
4 Oct 2026, 17:377,187+66
25 Sept 2026, 00:567,121+49
15 Sept 2026, 00:217,072+22
11 Sept 2026, 03:597,050+29
6 Sept 2026, 12:007,021+16
2 Sept 2026, 01:587,005+1
29 Aug 2026, 16:337,004+22
26 Aug 2026, 09:296,982-8
23 Aug 2026, 19:346,990+9
20 Aug 2026, 03:576,981first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.2%
avg views ÷ 8,105 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,420
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held38 (2 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total64,910
Reactions total840
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
278
Videos
6
Links
145

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,705 reactions across 38 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍57733.8%
❤31318.4%
😁22713.3%
🔥19811.6%
🤝392.29%
🤣362.11%
🎉352.05%
😱352.05%
👏341.99%
🙈281.64%
🥴251.47%
👻241.41%
🖕160.938%
👎130.762%
🫡100.587%
👌90.528%
✍80.469%
😘80.469%
🙏80.469%
🤔80.469%
18 further kinds543.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,705 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 38 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lolsAntiSpam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈6,690 views20 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

По чатам без бота вновь бушует эпидемия: чат переносится в новый чат 🙈 В отличие от предыдущего захода используются гостевые боты, но суть осталась та же: Под выдуманным предлогом у пользователя просят подтвердить аккаунт путём отправки своего номера телефона, получения на него кода и таким образом получают доступ к аккаунту. Дальше от его имени начинается рассылка по чатам, а чтобы сам пользователь не понимал, чт…

👍12🤣7💊1

5 Nov 2026, 23:47 UTC≈1,950 views21 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Если ваш клиент уже обновился, то вы можете посмотреть пример того, как выглядят виджеты ТГ, перейдя по ссылке. На данный момент боты могут отправлять их только в личку, и пересылать их оттуда нельзя. Если вкратце описать, что они из себя представляют: ● 32 КБ на всё (HTML + CSS + JS + картинки) до сжатия ● 4 КБ после сжатия zlib ● JavaScript исполняется движком QuickJS ● внешних сетевых запросов нет ● виджет може…

👍14🤔3❤2🆒2

4 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC≈2,310 views21 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

В арсенале бота модератора появились две новые команды: /block — позволяет добавить в чёрный список конкретный стикер, весь стикер-пак или все наборы, созданные автором. Для этого достаточно отправить команду в ответ на стикер. В дальнейшем бот будет удалять из чата стикеры, соответствующие заданным критериям, а их отправители будут получать короткий мьют. /unblock — выполняет обратное действие, снимая блокировку.…

👍15❤‍🔥3🤯2😈1

3 Nov 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,320 views28 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Не все знают, но у @lolsbot есть полезные функции и в личке 😳 Помимо настройки бота через команду /config и глобальных админских команд /gban и /gwl, бот также понимает: Фото, видео, стикеры, голосовые и кружочки — покажет распознанный текст и различную отладочную информацию для разработчиков. А если отправить премиум-эмодзи, бот преобразует его в HTML-представление для дальнейшего использования в других сервисах. …

❤12👍9💋4🔥3

1 Nov 2026, 14:28 UTC≈2,410 views21 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Небольшое обновление по опции «Капча новичкам» Некоторое время назад лолс начал показывать пользователям капчу в виде эфемерного сообщения в момент входа в группу. При этом время на прохождение капчи не ограничивалось, а отсутствие реакции со стороны пользователя не приводило ни к каким последствиям. Если пользователь проходил капчу в таком формате, она больше не появлялась в чате обычным сообщением. Это позволяло …

👍14😡4👏2🏆1

31 Oct 2026, 10:18 UTC≈3,140 views34 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

Telegram не взломали — просто теперь спамеры рассылают бесплатные деньги прямо на кошелёк пользователя! 😀 И поскольку спам приходит с официального сервисного аккаунта, антиспам для лички @neLOLsbot тут уже не поможет. В порядке бреда добавил в раздел Фейс-контроль две новые опции: Без кошелька и Без денег. Зачем оно кому-то нужно? — ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

😁20👍8🔥5🥴1

30 Oct 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,490 views27 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Бот всё дальше отдаляется от изначальной идеи: «Никаких настроек. Установил — и он работает» 🫠 Чем больше групп использует бота, тем разнообразнее становятся запросы админов на новые возможности и настройки. И вот теперь ещё две опции, которые раньше можно было только включить или выключить, обзавелись собственными интерфейсами настроек и переехали в раздел «Дополнения»: 📢 Подписка на канал Всё тот же механизм об…

❤13🤣7😁6🤬1

29 Oct 2026, 09:45 UTC≈2,130 views21 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Хотя практически никто не просил, но добавил в бота поддержку Guard Mode. По аналогии с капчей в личке, эта опция обрабатывает заявки на вступление в группу или канал, но вместо сообщения в личку пользователю показывается мини-приложение. Плюсы: пользователь не сможет «незаметить» капчу и с большей вероятностью успешно её пройдёт. Минусы: если пользователь из России использует прокси, а не VPN, сайт с капчей может …

❤11🤝5👏3🙏2

27 Oct 2026, 06:25 UTC≈2,840 views45 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Лучшие плагины для AyuGram... …пишут пользователи, которые установили себе эти самые плагины 🫠 Под видом особо востребованных в узких кругах плагинов для сноса аккаунтов распространяется троян. При запуске он визуально имитирует отправку каких-то жалоб, но на самом деле крадёт сессию пользователя и устанавливает закладку для удалённого управления аккаунтом. В дальнейшем с его помощью злоумышленники могут рассылать…

😁28🔥9😱5🤷‍♂3

25 Oct 2026, 09:25 UTC≈3,500 views57 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Video

⚠️ ВНИМАНИЕ! БУДЬТЕ ОСОБО ОСТОРОЖНЫ! Сегодня ночью антиспам Telegram чересчур строго реагировал на определённый текст сообщения при его отправке в чаты. Кто-то догадался воспользоваться этим и начал распространять ссылку, при переходе по которой предлагается выбрать получателя сообщения, а затем самостоятельно отправить ему текст. За это Telegram выдавал заморозку. И если сам Telegram достаточно оперативно исправил…

😁39👍14❤2🤔2

24 Oct 2026, 06:29 UTC≈3,030 views41 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Неделька выдалась слегка нервной, но зато помогла многим вспомнить про своё легаси и наконец-то заняться обновлением! 🤕 Больше всего хайпа было вокруг уязвимости в PHP. По анонсам складывалось впечатление, что это крах всего интернета: на PHP работает больше половины сайтов, а уязвимы все версии — от древней 5.4 (2012 год!) до 8.5.11 включительно. К тому же дыра в самом движке, и стреляет ещё до начала выполнения ко…

🤣15❤14🔥8🤝4

20 Oct 2026, 19:52 UTC≈4,450 views97 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Если раньше бесплатные юзернеймы для ботов могли оканчиваться только на BOT, то теперь с премиум-подпиской стали доступны новые суффиксы! Помимо предложенных вариантов, есть ещё один бонусный Встречайте нового официального клона — @LolsGay 😃

😁70🙈15😘8🥴4

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @lolsAntiSpam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[NEWS] Lols Anti Spam Bot” (@lolsAntiSpam), 8,105 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lolsAntiSpam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.