просто однажды встречаешь свое и уже не вкусно ни с кем)

Channel
loveeeeeee.story
@loveeesttory
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,357subscribers
-699 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001878525515 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @loveeesttory |
| Description | — из любви в любви с любовью. 💌 |
| Created | 27 September 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/loveeesttory |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:27 | 18,357 | +4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:54 | 18,353 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:26 | 18,349 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:19 | 18,360 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:45 | 18,372 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:15 | 18,375 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 18,381 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 18,384 | +2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 18,382 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:11 | 18,386 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 18,395 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 18,410 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 18,416 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:00 | 18,419 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 18,431 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 18,441 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:39 | 18,443 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 18,451 | -12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 18,463 | -10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 18,473 | first reading |
Engagement
220 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.96%
- avg views ÷ 18,357 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 910
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 40
- of 220 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 220 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 36,401 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,150
- Videos
- ≈57
- Links
- ≈10
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
счастье не в его подарках, счастье - это когда ты вправду ему интересна, когда он сам пишет, делает всё ради твоей улыбки. извиняется до того момента, пока ты не простишь, ни с кем не общается, кроме тебя. сам звонит, когда скучает. приезжает, чтобы увидеть тебя хотя бы на 5 минут.
если он хотел бы, он бы сделал все, чтобы быть рядом. другое дело, если он этого не хочет.
для каждого из нас уже есть то, что нам предназначено и ждёт нас. закрытые двери, опоздания на рейс, пробки, увольнения, расставания и разрушенные планы. всё во благо
до луны проще пешком добраться, чем рассказать всё, что стоит в горле комом.
она хотела, чтобы её полюбили так же, как умеет любить она
Блин, опять впн не работает... Знакомо?) А мне с этим впном нет🙃 📡 Обходки глушилок и белых списков 🌎 Много локаций 💻 Бесконечное количество устройств 🌐 Безлимит на трафик(обходки тоже безлимит) 💛 SAVE VPN — ЛУЧШИЙ VPN! Попробуй бесплатно👇
а ведь наша история началась с простой переписки, и закончилась «спасибо за всё»
я просто перестала искать причину. я все оставила как есть. не разлюбила, не остыла, не ищу замену, а просто устала стучаться в пустоту.
Мужчина который бежит от юбки к юбке, разве он мужчина? Мужчина должен знать себе цену. Слово «честь» касается не только женщин.
никогда не оправдывайся, и никому ничего не доказывай, пусть живут со своими сомнениями в тебе, но без тебя!
я отпустила человека, которого так хотелось любить.
Showing the 12 most recent of 220 posts we hold for @loveeesttory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 24 posts on @loveeesttory as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@tonplay · 391,2284 postsСейв VPN | Save VPN
@vpnsave · 280,4522 postsAtlanta VPN [Канал]
@AtlantaVPN · 976,1391 postAtlanta VPN bot
@AtlantaVPN_bot · 333,2911 postGreen VPN 🌿
@greenvpn_rbot · 97,7671 postJetTon Official
@jetton · 5121 postо чём говорят коллеги
@kollegi · 188,3891 postСегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,114,6131 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@loveeesttory named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@yourIoveforme · 25,843
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 September 2026
@ismoilovTHE · 30,643
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
@slyubovyu_mayaa · 20,834
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 September 2026
@cvoenravka · 25,745
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 September 2026
@vsplessski · 48,690
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 August 2026
@onIyeyss · 40,454
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
@amoursmi · 31,823
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 6 September 2026
@evetvgg · 21,711
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 21 September 2026
@mno_mno1 · 25,117
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
@storiesinstaa · 23,513
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 September 2026
@youuraffection · 24,908
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 September 2026
@vseotebe99 · 37,321
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 31 August 2026
@leylinurani · 44,551
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026
@pastelpastel · 25,187
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
@elisoullove · 29,122
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 7 September 2026
@soul_to_sooul · 35,079
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 1 September 2026
@iloveeyoustill · 76,565
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
@asyassoul · 79,618
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
@tthenddd · 21,092
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
@ruh_parcassi · 85,687
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
@tsitaty_arabskie_islamskie · 36,368
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
@love_is_dp · 32,384
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 September 2026
@krasivie_kartinki_1 · 46,870
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 25 August 2026
@psikhologiak · 64,552
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 65 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“loveeeeeee.story” (@loveeesttory), 18,357 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loveeesttory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.