Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lucha thoughts

Channel

Lucha thoughts

@luchathoughts

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,848subscribers

-329 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002719537503
TypeChannel
Username@luchathoughts
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/luchathoughts

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,84811,17711,012.56 August 2026 — 11,177 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,177 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,149 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,139 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,134 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,123 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,107 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,087 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,070 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,128 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,114 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,108 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,103 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,096 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,087 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,070 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,065 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,056 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,047 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,040 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,022 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,005 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,993 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,970 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,961 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,941 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,956 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,946 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,901 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,888 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,883 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,861 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,848 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,799–11,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:2210,848-13
15 Sept 2026, 17:5910,861-22
13 Sept 2026, 22:3710,883-5
12 Sept 2026, 06:2110,888-13
10 Sept 2026, 03:5810,901-45
6 Sept 2026, 18:1610,946-10
4 Sept 2026, 04:1510,956+15
2 Sept 2026, 19:1710,941-20
1 Sept 2026, 18:5510,961-9
31 Aug 2026, 17:1510,970-23
30 Aug 2026, 14:1310,993-12
29 Aug 2026, 11:3611,005-17
28 Aug 2026, 10:2411,022-18
27 Aug 2026, 11:5311,040-7
26 Aug 2026, 10:0611,047-9
25 Aug 2026, 07:1611,056-9
24 Aug 2026, 06:0711,065-5
22 Aug 2026, 11:5211,070-17
21 Aug 2026, 03:3711,087-9
20 Aug 2026, 06:4511,096first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 10,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,000
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held44 (11 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total33,050
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,920 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @portals_notifications

🎁 Gift Sold Algorithm Cup #7 🎁 - Model: Gold (17.0%) - Symbol: Thunderbird (1.0%) - Backdrop: Black (15.0%) Price: 18000 $Gram 💰

31 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC≈3,480 viewsread 3 September 2026

Если бабок хотите поднять, лучше сюда ставить, у меня только миллиардеры ставят, без шансов будет😁

31 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC≈3,530 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ладно наебал, я слишком ленивый что бы самому брать приключение, лучше вызову курьера. И вам советую!)

31 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈3,340 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Даю подсказку в @caps, а там уже как хотите

30 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC≈3,060 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @portals_notifications

🎁 Gift Sold Algorithm Cup #29 🎁 - Model: Gold (17.0%) - Symbol: Wreath (0.8%) - Backdrop: Pure Gold (6.0%) Price: 4730 $Gram 💰

30 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC≈2,730 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @portals_notifications

🎁 Gift Sold Algorithm Cup #7 🎁 - Model: Gold (17.0%) - Symbol: Thunderbird (1.0%) - Backdrop: Black (15.0%) Price: 15000 $Gram 💰

28 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈3,030 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

💎 TON withdrawals are live in Portex You can now withdraw your winnings in GRAM — straight to your TON wallet. Transfers land in a couple of minutes. Any TON wallet or exchange works — for exchanges, make sure to include the MEMO.

27 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,780 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

⭐️ One More Million. Gone for Good. 😡 We’ve just bought back another 1,000,000 $MAJOR from the market to burn them too. All in. We burn our tokens on a regular basis to reduce the supply and keep $MAJOR scarce. 🔄 Back in June, we burned the full 5,000,000 of newly unlocked tokens. In total, around 10% of the total $MAJOR supply is already out of circulation. 🔥 Buyback. Burn. Repeat. This is step 2 of 7 to Make M…

24 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈3,730 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @gift_newstg

Posted without readable text

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @luchathoughts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTCAnonymous Poll564 voters

Изменят ставку?

  1. Да31%
  2. Нет30%
  3. Не слежу39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lucha thoughts” (@luchathoughts), 10,848 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luchathoughts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.