Channel
@cartelgunwest
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
48,306subscribers
-7,720 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001257924843 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cartelgunwest |
| Description | 🥀💀 По ВСЕМ вопросам: @Management_rhymes +7 953 361 6248 Арина Концерты: @kb_rhymes +7 951 647-87-09 Ксения Сотрудничество и реклама: @adsrhymes +7 992 190 7533 Ольга РКН № 7020955319 |
| Created | 5 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cartelgunwest |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 48,306 | -364 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 48,670 | -89 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 48,759 | -142 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 48,901 | -97 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 48,998 | -176 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 49,174 | -218 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 49,392 | -281 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 49,673 | -227 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:35 | 49,900 | -3,048 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:45 | 52,948 | -102 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:07 | 53,050 | -47 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 53,097 | -79 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 53,176 | -52 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 53,228 | -58 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 53,286 | -269 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 53,555 | -495 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 54,050 | -122 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 54,172 | -75 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 54,247 | -193 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 54,440 | first reading |
171 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 171 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 432,711 |
| Reactions total | 9,813 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 06:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
25,818 reactions across 162 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5474504219018953503 | 10,973 | 42.5% | |
| custom 5474370761500164740 | 7,004 | 27.1% | |
| custom 5381812420975038779 | 4,367 | 16.9% | |
| custom 5188193379715941008 | 3,474 | 13.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 166 of the 171 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,355 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cartelgunwest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 171 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ПЭПЭ ШНЕЙНЕ ДАЕТ ВСЕМ 😍😃🌟 В каком городе хотите увидеть меня легендарного?!😎
custom 547437076150016474027custom 53818124209750387796custom 51881933797159410085custom 54745042190189535033
И КУДА МЫ ВСЕ ТАКИМ СОСТАВОМ? 😃🥰🥰
custom 5474504219018953503146custom 547437076150016474035custom 518819337971594100826custom 53818124209750387797
🥰+😘=😍 🌟
custom 5381812420975038779109custom 547450421901895350339custom 547437076150016474023custom 518819337971594100810
ⲥⲟⲥυ ⲙⲉⲏя ⲅⲩⳝⲁⲙυ 👄 ⲃыⲭⲟⲇ ⲧⲣⲉⲕⲁ:2 ⲟⲕⲧяⳝⲣя 🥰 ⲅⲁύⲏⲉⲧ 🤖
custom 5474504219018953503133custom 518819337971594100823custom 547437076150016474019custom 53818124209750387797
😍😁😍
custom 5188193379715941008104custom 547450421901895350338custom 547437076150016474024custom 53818124209750387797
😍 ⲙы ⲥ ⲧⲟⳝⲟύ ⲙⲉⲣⲧⲃыⲉ ⲇⲩϣυ ⲧⲣⲉⲕ:ⲙⲉⲣⲧⲃыⲉ ⲇⲩϣυ ⲃыⲭⲟⲇ:ⲏⲉ υⳅⲃⲉⲥⲧⲏⲟ 👀 ГАЙНЕТ 🤖
custom 547437076150016474098custom 547450421901895350332custom 518819337971594100819custom 53818124209750387797
😍 ⲧⲩⲧ ⲙы ⲥ Толей Самером ⲡⲣυⲇⲩⲙⲁⲗυ ⲇⲣⲩⲅ ⲇⲗя ⲇⲣⲩⲅⲁ ⲏⲟⲃыⲉ ⲥⲗⲟⲃⲁ: ⲡⲉⲡⲉ, ϣⲏⲉύⲏⲉ, ⲉⲏυⲕυ-ⳝⲉⲏυⲕυ, ⲥⲩⲇⲁⲕⲁⲙⲟ,😎!! ⲕⲁⲕ ⲇⲩⲙⲁⲉⲧⲉ, ϭⰓυ ⲗⲩϭϣⲉ? 😘😁 ⲡυϣυⲧⲉ ⲃ ⲕⲟⲙⲙⲉⲏⲧⲁⲣυяⲭ 👇🏻
custom 5474504219018953503113custom 547437076150016474029custom 518819337971594100826custom 538181242097503877912
😍 ⲙы ⲧⲩⲧ ⲥ ⲧⲟⲗⲉύ ⲥⲁⲙⲉⲣⲟⲙ ⲡⲉⲡⲉ ϣⲏⲉύⲏⲉ,ⲥⲩⲇⲁⲕⲁⲙⲟ ⲉⲏυⲕυ ⳝⲉⲏυⲕυ,ⲏⲉ ⲙⲟⲿⲉⲙ ⲡⲟⲏяⲧⰓ ϭⲧⲟ ⲇⲉⲃⲟϭⲕυ υⲙⲉⲗυ ⲃ ⲃυⲇⲩ? ⲃы ⲕⲁⲕ ⲇⲩⲙⲁⲉⲧⲉ,ⲡυϣυⲧⲉ ⲃ ⲕⲟⲙⲙⲉⲏⲧⲁⲣυяⲭ 👇🏻🥰
custom 538181242097503877990custom 547450421901895350328custom 518819337971594100821custom 547437076150016474011
ⲉⲏυⲕυ ⳝⲉⲏυⲕυ υⲗυ ⲡⲉⲡⲉ ⲫⲁ? 😍 ⲡυϣυⲧⲉ ⲃ ⲕⲟⲙⲙⲉⲏⲧⲁⲣυяⲭ 😁 👇
custom 5474504219018953503118custom 547437076150016474037custom 518819337971594100829custom 538181242097503877912
ⲡⲟⲥⲟⲃⲉⲧⲟⲃⲁⲗ ⲧⲟⲗⲉ ⲥⲁⲙⲉⲣⲩ ⲕⲁⲕυⲉ ⲥⲇⲉⲗⲁⲧⰓ ⲉⲙⲩ ⲥⲩⲇⲁⲕⲁⲙⲟ ⲡⲉⲡⲉ ϣⲏⲉύⲏⲉ ⲧⲁⲧⲩυⲣⲟⲃⲕυ 😃 ⲁ ⲕⲁⲕυⲉ ⲃⲁϣυ ⲃⲁⲣυⲁⲏⲧы,ⲡυϣυⲧⲉ ⲃ ⲕⲟⲙⲙⲉⲏⲧⲁⲣυяⲭ👇🏻 ⳅⲁ ⲅⲟⲣⲁⲙυ ⳅⲁ ⲗⲉⲥⲁⲙυ? 🏔️🌳
custom 5474504219018953503127custom 547437076150016474023custom 538181242097503877918custom 518819337971594100815
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 5474504219018953503104custom 538181242097503877935custom 518819337971594100820custom 547437076150016474011
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 518819337971594100863custom 547450421901895350324custom 547437076150016474015custom 53818124209750387798
Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @cartelgunwest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | GUNWEST |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian rapper |
| YouTube | UCpxacO9dujoE95ef7xNmbJQ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ГАНВЕСТ” (@cartelgunwest), 48,306 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cartelgunwest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.