Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Уголовный аудит

Channel

Уголовный аудит

@ugaud

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

713subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001884052229
TypeChannel
Username@ugaud
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ugaud

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

708713710.57 August 2026 — 710 subscribers8 August 2026 — 710 subscribers14 August 2026 — 708 subscribers20 August 2026 — 710 subscribers2 September 2026 — 711 subscribers11 September 2026 — 713 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 35 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 707–714 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 12:00713+2
2 Sept 2026, 20:42711+1
20 Aug 2026, 18:25710+2
14 Aug 2026, 17:08708-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:17710no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:38710first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 58s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3951.3%
😱1418.4%
1215.8%
🤯67.89%
🥴33.95%
👎22.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ugaud. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC99 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Остался час до полуночи! Самое время поговорить о ... порно! Уголовная ответственность за порнографию, тренд последнего времени. Под ударом известные эскортницы и не только. Каждый, кто снимает себя и пересылает фото другу или подруге может стать субъектом уголовного преследования и получить от 2-х до 6-ти лет лишения свободы по тяжкому составу. Смотрим на Ютуб: https://youtu.be/DYVykTZuovM Или в VK https://vkvi

6 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ИНКВИЗИЦИОННАЯ ПРОКУРАТУРА? Последнее время - год-полтора, новая мода появилась. Если раньше в уголовной практике апелляция от прокуратуры была редкостью, то сейчас мы уже удивляемся, когда прокурор не обжаловал. Если раньше жалобы были на процесс, право и серьезные ошибки, то теперь - мягкость приговора. Надо быть честным, адвокаты обжалуют по строгости наказания приговоры почти всегда, но это - требование закона

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC96 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Болевой душевный порог, кажется, снизился до исторических значаений. То, что раньше повергало в грусть и раздумия, теперь пролистывается за секунду, как неинтересное. Последний месяц я стал гораздо счастливее, удалив все, кроме одного, новостные каналы. Новости узнаю от друзей или когда уже совсем невозможно их не узнать. За исключением, конечно же, профессиональных! Следить за делом Лерчек - это уже своего рода пов

👍3👎2

4 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC113 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ни за что не догадаетесь, какой тип подозреваемых колется быстрее всех! Полицейские. В бытность следователем я расследовал в районе все должностные преступления и материалы. Расследовать их было очень просто, достаточно было надеть на полицейского наручники, как разговор моментально перетекал в нужное русло. Сейчас, по прошествии 10-ти лет и внушительный опыт со стороны человека, могу назвать тому две причины: 1

👍4

3 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC120 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ПРО КВАРТИРЫ Эффект Долиной проскакивает в эфир все реже, но надо не надо журналисты сравнивают с ним совершенно иные процессы. Так, в одном из ТГ-каналов в качестве новеллы была освещена покупка квартиры и дальнейшее появление в ней "родственника бывших владельцев" с правом проживания, которое никуда не денешь. История эта известна абсолютно всем юристам в недвижке и адекватным риелторам уже много лет. Именно по

👍4

31 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC182 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ЛЕРЧЕК ДАЛИ УСЛОВНО Осудили за два дня по выделенному делу. Предполагаю даже содержание разговора между помощником судьи / гособвинителем и адвокатом перед назначением процесса, но это все лишь предположения. Факт остается фактом - можешь сниматься в рекламе, хайпить в сети и все остальное, что разделило общество на два лагеря - сочувствующих и хейтеров с вескими основаниями, значит и в судебном процессе принимать

👍2

31 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC188 viewsread 8 August 2026

В следующем году введут обязательную государственную электронную почту, сначала для предпринимателей, потом для граждан. И это ХОРОШО! Все вокруг ноют, что это дополнительный сбор денег. Но это та мера, котрая, вполне вероятно, сможет победить те дырки, которыми пользуются мошенники, как в деле с моим другом Ганвестом. Кстати, там все хорошо, но прилетел еще один приказ на 500 000. С ним уже было проще, спасибо су

31 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC153 views8 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

Пожалуй, самое мерзкое на сегодняшний день - читать с каждого билборда "поддержите предпринимателей". Предприниматель - человек, действующий на свой страх и риск, ему никто ничего не должен. Не нравится - иди работай в найм, за тебя другие будут предпринимать. То, что коммерс вряд ли читал оферту ВБ на 100 листах убористым шрифтом - это разве проблема всего народа, который теперь должен ему помочь? Нет, это сугубо

👍8

29 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC200 viewsread 8 August 2026

ДУРОВ В РОЗЫСКЕ? Юридически, скорее нет, чем да. Законом предусмотрен алгоритм, который, очевидно еще не реализован: • предъявление обвинения (заочное в т.ч.) • заочный арест • международный розыск Вот только так и никак иначе. Решения Басманного суда или какого-либо еще суда РФ мы не видели. Какие последствия? Вполне вероятно Павла внесут в перечень террористов / экстремистов, в связи, опять же, с предъявление

17 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC262 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍2

17 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC238 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какой я опер?

  1. ОУР46%
  2. ОБППЛ18%
  3. ОЭБ и ПК36%
  4. ФСБ0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🥴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ugaud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

Какой я опер?

  1. ОУР46%
  2. ОБППЛ18%
  3. ОЭБ и ПК36%
  4. ФСБ0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Уголовный аудит” (@ugaud), 713 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ugaud.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.