Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лукичёв Илья Life Channel

Channel

Лукичёв Илья Life Channel

@lukichev_ilya_Channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,092subscribers

+719 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001839907125
TypeChannel
Username@lukichev_ilya_Channel
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lukichev_ilya_Channel

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,3739,5218,9477 August 2026 — 8,373 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,379 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,381 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,382 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,416 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,421 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,426 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,422 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,447 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,452 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,473 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,474 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,483 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,490 subscribers29 September 2026 — 8,530 subscribers6 October 2026 — 8,598 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,621 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,704 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,710 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,759 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,795 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,521 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,154 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,981 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,092 subscribers9,0927 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +719. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,201–9,693 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 11:369,092+111
3 Nov 2026, 09:448,981-173
30 Oct 2026, 23:359,154-367
28 Oct 2026, 08:169,521+726
25 Oct 2026, 13:358,795+36
22 Oct 2026, 05:298,759+49
19 Oct 2026, 02:468,710+6
15 Oct 2026, 23:048,704+83
12 Oct 2026, 16:468,621+23
6 Oct 2026, 12:398,598+68
29 Sept 2026, 04:218,530+40
18 Sept 2026, 20:228,490+7
14 Sept 2026, 22:188,483+9
11 Sept 2026, 12:588,474+1
6 Sept 2026, 15:028,473+21
2 Sept 2026, 04:028,452+5
30 Aug 2026, 14:428,447+25
27 Aug 2026, 13:148,422-4
24 Aug 2026, 07:428,426+5
20 Aug 2026, 08:528,421first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 9,092 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held102 (24 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total25,291
Reactions total562
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 25s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,594 reactions across 99 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,04640.3%
👍48418.7%
❤44517.2%
💯2359.06%
🔥1796.90%
🤷‍♂732.81%
🤬391.50%
👎281.08%
🍓210.81%
🤔160.617%
🙏150.578%
🍌100.386%
🥰30.116%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,594 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:18 UTC677 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Интересно... А что будет если поменять правила свиданий? Этот вопрос возник в ходе обсуждения данной темы Система свиданий обычно такая - сперва свидание, а потом секс. Если до секса дело не дошло, то симпатии не возникло (чаще всего у женщины) либо смелости не хватило (чаще всего у мужчины). А что если бы мужчины начали предлагать сперва секс, а потом свидания? Давайте только без шуточек попробуем обсудить эту т…

👍6❤1🤔1

5 Nov 2026, 07:35 UTC810 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Я часто говорю о том, что в свинге очень важно не только уметь давать отказы, но и принимать их с достоинством не менее важно. А вот о том что благодарности так же важно давать и уметь принимать ни разу не говорил. Будто бы это все умеют, но нет... Потом люди искренне не понимают откуда возникают обидки на ровном месте.

💯10❤4👎1

5 Nov 2026, 00:12 UTC937 views39 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Я уже со счету сбился сколько людей послал на три буквы за сутки... Это кстати тот самый долбоеб который ищет лесбиянку среди свингеров 😂

😁39

4 Nov 2026, 23:04 UTC897 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Такие запросы поступают почти каждому организатору.

😁30🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC941 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня не ретроградный случаем? Или дурка всех выпустила? Когда нибудь я научусь вежливо посылать нахуй 😂

😁19🤷‍♂1

4 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,910 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Я с таким явлением сталкиваюсь практически на каждом мероприятии для новичков. Мужья (да и некоторые жены тоже) тащат своих супруг всякими правдами и неправдами - из разряда "приведу, а там вдруг понравится" Нет, блять, не понравится! Женщинам не нравится когда их ведут туда, куда они не знают заранее. Даже если обещал в кафешку, а привел ее в супер дорогой ресторан. Ни одна женщина подобное не оценит как сюрприз.…

😁19❤2👍2🤬2

4 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC959 views74 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Обожаю таких "парочек"😂😂😂

😁74

4 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,150 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Здесь есть практически всё что Вы искали по теме свинга. https://t.me/addlist/Cg_MHvrD6PgxYWQ6 - здесь все наши открытые и бесплатные каналы с чатами всего проекта. Перейдя по ссылке сперва выберете в какие из них хотите вступить. @REC_foto_bot - сюда посылать фото, которые попадают в разные каналы. Вы сами выбираете куда отправить нюдсы (в том числе и мужские) @white_masks_bot - здесь пары ищут мужчин, а так же п…

❤7

3 Nov 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,020 views57 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Мужики изврашенцы? Что покажет мужчина если попросить его показать его игрушки? Скорее всего это будет коллекция дисков на приставку или на компе. Либо настолки с фигурками. Что покажет женщина?😁 Что скажет мужчина на вопрос - какие у тебя секс фантазии? Скорее всего ответит - хочу Трахать в жопу, а ещё жмж и горловой чтоб сделали. И всё на этом. Спросите женщину и будете слушать до утра Как мужики обсуждают секс …

😁47💯9👎1

3 Nov 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,020 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Обожаю книги (фильмы, игры и в целом истории) где нет четкого зла и четкого добра. Где зло может оказаться добром, а добро злом. Но может ли в жизни зло оправдываться добром? Обесценивается ли добро причененным злом? Так вот книги и другие истории дают простой ответ на эти вопросы "добро и зло, как и красота - в глазах смотрящего" Одно и то же действие для одних может быть добром, а для других злом. Причем свинг?…

❤10

3 Nov 2026, 06:01 UTC≈1,050 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Я был в том году на этом фестивале и если в этом году будет хотябы примерно так же, то это будет шедеврально! Я серьёзно. Собрать и организовать концерт на стадионе с многотысячной аудиторией проще чем секс фестиваль на 300-400 человек в одном большом доме Раз в году десятки оргов решают объединиться и доказать чей клан сильнее, сексуальнее и активнее Я же решил что мне будет тяжеловато тягаться с московскими клан…

👍9❤3🔥2🍓1🥰1

2 Nov 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,120 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Я понимаю когда подобные объявления от 40+ летних мужиков. Но в 21 год чисто лизуном быть? Однако... Может я чего не понимаю?

😁13

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @lukichev_ilya_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

В поиске того самого
@lvira_lina_up · 18,859
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лукичёв Илья Life Channel” (@lukichev_ilya_Channel), 9,092 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lukichev_ilya_Channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.