Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Swing ликбез. От теории к практике

Channel

Swing ликбез. От теории к практике

@swing_love_is

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

31,350subscribers

-88 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387770587
TypeChannel
Username@swing_love_is
DescriptionПроект "СВои Люди" Статьи о свинге По всем вопросам в личку @Ilya_swoi По вопросам сотрудничества и рекламы https://t.me/+V9oqlg3QqxAzNTcy ЛГБТ, религия, политика, проституция, наркотики - под запретом ИП Лукичёв И.А. ИНН 525913203052
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/swing_love_is

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

30,94831,45731,202.57 August 2026 — 31,438 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,438 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,431 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,398 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,387 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,371 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,350 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,325 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,306 subscribers15 August 2026 — 31,267 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,264 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,230 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,222 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,200 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,175 subscribers21 August 2026 — 31,160 subscribers22 August 2026 — 31,154 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31,089 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,037 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,012 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,982 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,959 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,948 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,109 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31,223 subscribers1 September 2026 — 31,241 subscribers4 September 2026 — 31,265 subscribers6 September 2026 — 31,319 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,364 subscribers12 September 2026 — 31,430 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,427 subscribers15 September 2026 — 31,441 subscribers17 September 2026 — 31,457 subscribers27 September 2026 — 31,416 subscribers4 October 2026 — 31,400 subscribers9 October 2026 — 31,401 subscribers13 October 2026 — 31,426 subscribers14 October 2026 — 31,422 subscribers15 October 2026 — 31,431 subscribers16 October 2026 — 31,443 subscribers17 October 2026 — 31,437 subscribers18 October 2026 — 31,429 subscribers19 October 2026 — 31,421 subscribers20 October 2026 — 31,381 subscribers22 October 2026 — 31,390 subscribers22 October 2026 — 31,389 subscribers23 October 2026 — 31,388 subscribers25 October 2026 — 31,374 subscribers25 October 2026 — 31,380 subscribers26 October 2026 — 31,357 subscribers27 October 2026 — 31,339 subscribers29 October 2026 — 31,330 subscribers29 October 2026 — 31,303 subscribers31 October 2026 — 31,301 subscribers1 November 2026 — 31,284 subscribers2 November 2026 — 31,279 subscribers4 November 2026 — 31,278 subscribers5 November 2026 — 31,339 subscribers5 November 2026 — 31,350 subscribers31,3507 August 20265 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net -88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,872–31,533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 23:1031,350+11
5 Nov 2026, 00:0931,339+61
4 Nov 2026, 00:3731,278-1
2 Nov 2026, 21:5731,279-5
1 Nov 2026, 19:2831,284-17
31 Oct 2026, 22:1531,301-2
29 Oct 2026, 23:5631,303-27
29 Oct 2026, 02:1831,330-9
27 Oct 2026, 21:0631,339-18
26 Oct 2026, 21:0631,357-23
25 Oct 2026, 22:0631,380+6
25 Oct 2026, 01:1731,374-14
23 Oct 2026, 21:5031,388-1
22 Oct 2026, 23:3731,389-1
22 Oct 2026, 01:0831,390+9
20 Oct 2026, 19:1831,381-40
19 Oct 2026, 19:0131,421-8
18 Oct 2026, 21:4731,429-8
17 Oct 2026, 18:5031,437-6
16 Oct 2026, 21:5031,443first reading

Engagement

333 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 157 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 31,350 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,200
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
82
of 333 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 82 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held333 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total262,710
Reactions total3,457
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,250
Videos
≈976
Links
≈3,380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 56m
Average length
1m 52s

Measured directly from 94 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,731 reactions across 327 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,16640.6%
❤2,28417.9%
👎1,48411.7%
🔥1,30410.2%
😁1,1789.25%
💯5764.52%
🤷‍♂2642.07%
🍓1841.45%
🍌1511.19%
👏660.518%
🤔410.322%
😍160.126%
💋60.047%
🤩60.047%
⚡50.039%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 329 of the 333 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,731 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 333 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 333 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @swing_love_is. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 333 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 82 posts held from the last 30 days (15.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,120 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Мужчины возмущаются, что вход для одиночек очень дорогой... Ок Вот вам бесплатный доступ https://t.me/swinger_chat Бесплатно это же хорошо? Не нравится что там одни фейки и дрочеры? А кто их должен фильтровать? Админы? А зачем админу каждый день фильтровать сотни новых входящих за бесплатно? Хотите чтобы всё было распределено по регионам? Хотите чтобы у всех были нормальные анкеты? Хотите чтобы у всех был нормальн…

👍6💯2

5 Nov 2026, 06:33 UTC≈2,050 views131 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Имеет ли рост значение при выборе секс партнёров? Мужчины 👍 Да 👎 Нет Пары ❤️ Да 🔥 Нет Женщины 🍓 Да 🍌 Нет 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Навигация проекта @Swing_Navigator_BOT 🤩Чат для SW и МЖМ @white_masks_bot ❤️Порно архив 🤩Тематические комиксы @ComixSW_bot ❤️Канал "Обсуди жену" @discuss_my_wife_bot 🤩Канал "Обсуди мужа" @discuss_my_hasbent_bot ❤️Книга для и про свингеров 🤩Бесплатные игры @FuntSW_bot ❤️Анонсы вечеринок @sex_anons…

👎49❤36👍17🔥16🍓13

4 Nov 2026, 15:10 UTC≈2,130 views36 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @lukichev_ilya_ChannelPhoto

Я с таким явлением сталкиваюсь практически на каждом мероприятии для новичков. Мужья (да и некоторые жены тоже) тащат своих супруг всякими правдами и неправдами - из разряда "приведу, а там вдруг понравится" Нет, блять, не понравится! Женщинам не нравится когда их ведут туда, куда они не знают заранее. Даже если обещал в кафешку, а привел ее в супер дорогой ресторан. Ни одна женщина подобное не оценит как сюрприз.…

😁20💯13❤2👎1

4 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC≈2,580 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Здесь есть практически всё что Вы искали по теме свинга. https://t.me/addlist/Cg_MHvrD6PgxYWQ6 - здесь все наши открытые и бесплатные каналы с чатами всего проекта. Перейдя по ссылке сперва выберете в какие из них хотите вступить. @REC_foto_bot - сюда посылать фото, которые попадают в разные каналы. Вы сами выбираете куда отправить нюдсы (в том числе и мужские) @white_masks_bot - здесь пары ищут мужчин, а так же п…

❤8👎1

3 Nov 2026, 05:45 UTC≈3,220 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Грядет "Темный Мир"

🔥3👎1

2 Nov 2026, 09:29 UTC≈3,540 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Поговорим про заблуждения Свингеры не любят одиночек! Это не так. Есть даже статья в защиту одиночек где более подробно расписано (статья открывается если нажать на картинку, а не ссылку) Свингеры ненавидят дрочеров, гомиков, сливщиков, рабов, лизунов, наркоманов, разводил и долбоебов. И это не зависит от пола и статуса. Так уж просто совпало что 99% из этого списка выпадает на одиночек. А вот к нормальным одиночк…

👏18❤7👍5👎1

1 Nov 2026, 10:49 UTC≈3,610 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026

БАЗА Это всё что нужно знать новичкам. На изучение уйдет полчаса. На осознание полдня. На принятие вечность. - знание тематического этикета - знание заповедей свинга - знание правил вечеринок - знание тематического жаргона - знание тематических стереотипов - знание черного списка разводил (чтобы не попасть на мошенников) - адекватное поведение, под которым подразумевается, что собеседник не окажется дрочером, шанта…

👍11❤1👎1

31 Oct 2026, 10:42 UTC≈3,800 views65 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Всё что вам нужно знать о свинге вкратце 1. Свинг не спасает браки и не разрушает их. Если в отношениях всё плохо, то будет ещё хуже. Если всё хорошо то станет ещё лучше. 2. Свинг это не волшебный мир с единорогами. Тут такие же люди как и вас окружающие. Тут не существует идеалов из ваших фантазий. 3. Свингеры не озабоченные извращенцы, которые ебут всё что движется. И не оголодавшие по сексу, чтобы "давать" всем…

👍41❤13🔥5💯4👎1👏1

30 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC≈4,040 views143 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

У вас есть секс игрушки? Покажите в комментах свою коллекцию (даже любопытно что у мужчин может оказаться) Мужчины 👍 Да 👎 Нет Пара ❤️ Да 🔥 Нет Женщина 🍓 Да 🍌 Нет 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Навигация проекта @Swing_Navigator_BOT 🤩Чат для SW и МЖМ @white_masks_bot ❤️Порно архив 🤩Тематические комиксы @ComixSW_bot ❤️Канал "Обсуди жену" @discuss_my_wife_bot 🤩Канал "Обсуди мужа" @discuss_my_hasbent_bot ❤️Книга для и про свингеров 🤩Б…

❤76👍38👎17🍓11🔥1

29 Oct 2026, 09:04 UTC≈4,390 views106 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Есть любители спортивных женщин?) Или что то другое имеется ввиду когда указывают "ищем спортивных или мы спортики"?

👎48🔥23😁12❤9👍5🤔5🤷‍♂3⚡1

28 Oct 2026, 18:17 UTC≈4,170 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @lukichev_ilya_Channel

Цикл статей про стратегии развития организаторов Следующая часть выйдет как на этой записи наберётся 50❤️ (этим вы показываете что интересен разбор данной темы) Начнём с простого — заход в существующую систему. В какой то степени это можно сравнить с франшизой и как в любой франшизе есть разные условия сотрудничества, но суть одинаковая — вы берёте существующий бренд или ресурс, на котором развиваетесь, при поддер…

❤56🔥6🍌2⚡1🤷‍♂1

28 Oct 2026, 15:30 UTC≈3,770 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Вам нравится делиться фотографиями своей жены или смотреть на чужих жён? Все наверняка уже знают про существование фотобатла где идёт соревнования, но не все знают что есть отдельные каналы где фото публикуются для пошлых обсуждений Чтобы отправить фото нужно зайти в нашего бота приёмщика @REC_foto_bot и выбрав нужный раздел отправить фотку. Если у вас не открывается фотобатл то у вас установлено ограничение 18+ (…

👍16🍓3🔥3👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 333 posts we hold for @swing_love_is. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@swing_love_is edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 September 2026
Most recent edit
22 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @swing_love_is as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Oct 2026, 13:34 UTCAnonymous Poll553 voters

Вопрос к мужчинам одиночкам. Согласитесь встретиться с парой, если мужчина в паре вызывает у вас антипатию, а его жена сексуальное влечение?

  1. Да, мне всё равно. Главное это женщина17%
  2. Да, готов потерпеть такую мелочь19%
  3. Нет, для меня важно чтобы в паре оба вызывали симпатию64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Oct 2026, 13:27 UTCAnonymous Poll4,380 voters approx.

Кто Вы?

  1. Мы семейная пара49%
  2. Мы не семейная пара (живём вместе, но без штампа)7%
  3. Мы пара любовники5%
  4. Я женатый одиночка18%
  5. Я холостой одиночка14%
  6. Я замужняя одиночка2%
  7. Я свободная одиночка6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Oct 2026, 06:10 UTCAnonymous Poll2,310 voters approx.

Вопрос для до (девушек одиночек). Сколько вам лет?

  1. От 18 до 242%
  2. От 25 до 292%
  3. От 30 до 342%
  4. От 35 до 394%
  5. От 40 до 496%
  6. От 502%
  7. Узнать результаты82%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTCAnonymous Poll1,170 voters approx.

Интересно, а возможно ли собрать такую вечеринку, на которой все будут сексуально активными? Ну то есть все придут не ради "посмотреть"

  1. Мы пара с опытом. Да. Возможно17%
  2. Мы пара с опытом. Нет. Невозможно16%
  3. Мы пара без опыта. Да, думаем что возможно14%
  4. Мы пара без опыта. Нет, думаем что невозможно12%
  5. Я одиночка с опытом. Да. Возможно14%
  6. Я одиночка с опытом. Нет. Невозможно6%
  7. Я одиночка без опыта. Да, думаю что возможно11%
  8. Я одиночка без опыта. Нет, думаю что невозможно6%
  9. Я дрочер, для меня нет ничего невозможного4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTCAnonymous Poll1,510 voters approx.

Вопрос к женщинам, которые в паре со своим мужем практикуют свинг форматы и групповой секс. Есть ли у вас страхи, связанные с тематикой? Если есть, то какие? (Можно выбрать несколько)

  1. Узнать результат78%
  2. Нет страхов6%
  3. Да, я боюсь что он мне станет изменять3%
  4. Да, я боюсь что он уйдет из семьи2%
  5. Да, я боюсь что он что нибудь подцепит4%
  6. Да, я боюсь что он других женщин будет хотеть больше чем меня7%
  7. Да, я боюсь ревности5%
  8. Да, я боюсь общественного осуждения2%
  9. Да, я боюсь в кого нибудь влюбиться или начать самой изменять мужу3%
  10. Да, я боюсь что я никому не понравилюсь/ отказов4%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Sept 2026, 07:03 UTCAnonymous Poll1,350 voters approx.

Станете встречаться с партнёрами без опыта ?(Можно выбрать несколько вариантов)

  1. Мы пара. С мужчиной да30%
  2. Мы пара. С парой да40%
  3. Мы пара. С женщиной да27%
  4. Мы пара. Нет5%
  5. Я мужчина. С парой да30%
  6. Я мужчина. С женщиной (женщинами) да24%
  7. Я мужчина. Нет1%
  8. Я женщина. С парой да2%
  9. Я женщина. С мужчиной (мужчинами) да3%
  10. Я женщина. Нет2%

The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 333 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Swing ликбез. От теории к практике” (@swing_love_is), 31,350 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swing_love_is.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.