Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مجالس السلف

Channel

مجالس السلف

@majals

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,650subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001178268793
TypeChannel
Username@majals
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/majals

Growth

8,6228,6718,646.56 August 2026 — 8,671 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,671 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,670 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,660 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,657 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,647 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,640 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,643 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,633 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,622 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,644 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,656 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,650 subscribers8,6506 August 20268 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 33 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,615–8,678 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 14:218,650-6
3 Sept 2026, 17:018,656+12
31 Aug 2026, 00:138,644+22
27 Aug 2026, 21:248,622-11
25 Aug 2026, 07:428,633-10
22 Aug 2026, 01:358,643+3
18 Aug 2026, 14:188,640-7
15 Aug 2026, 17:168,647-10
11 Aug 2026, 22:478,657-3
9 Aug 2026, 06:428,660-10
6 Aug 2026, 06:148,670-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:158,671no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:078,671first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 8,650 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,520
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held32 (5 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total15,163
Reactions total376
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,236 reactions across 30 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,03483.7%
👍524.21%
😢433.48%
😁312.51%
💔191.54%
😭171.38%
💘131.05%
🤣70.566%
🕊30.243%
❤‍🔥20.162%
🍌20.162%
👌20.162%
👏20.162%
💯20.162%
🤗20.162%
👀10.081%
🔥10.081%
😍10.081%
🙏10.081%
🤩10.081%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC302 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• مِمّا أُثر عن عليٍّ -رضي الله عنه- في خبر وفاة النبيّ ﷺ قوله: «اللهم إنّا نشهد أن قد بلّغ ما أُنزل إليه، ونصح لأُمّته، وجاهَدَ في سبيل الله حتى أعزَّ الله دينَه، وتمّت كلِمَتُه. اللهم فاجعلنا مِمّن يتّبع ما أُنزِل إليه، وثبِّتْنا بعدَه، واجمع بينَنا وبينَه». [طبقات ابن سعد] ❁ مجالس السلف

17😢3

24 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC931 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• عن ابن المبارك أنّه قال: «إنّ البُصراءَ لا يَأمَنُون مِن أربع خصال: ذنبٍ قد مضى لا يدري ما يصنع الربُّ فيه. وعُمرٍ قد بقي لا يدري ماذا فيه من الهلكات. وفضلٍ قد أعطي لعلّه مكرٌ واستدراجٌ وضلالة؛ وقد زُيّنت له فيراها هدًى. ومِن زيغِ القلب ساعةً، ساعةً أَسرَعُ مِن طَرفةِ عينٍ قد يُسلَب دِينُه وهو لا يَشعَر». [شعب الإيمان] ❁ مجالس السلف

😢189💔3👌2

21 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈1,270 views43 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• قال ابن أبي الدنيا: حدثنا الحسين قال: حدثنا عبد الله قال: حدثني علي بن الحسين العامريّ، قال: حدثني أبو بدر، قال: حدثنا عمر بن ذر، قال: بلغنا أن أم الدرداء رضي الله عنها كانت تقول: «إنّ الراضين بقضاء الله الذين ما قضى لهم رَضُوا به؛ لهم في الجنة مَنارٌ لَيغبِطهم بها الشهداءُ يوم القيامة». [كتاب الرضا عن الله بقضائه لابن أبي الدنيا] ❁ مجالس السلف

41😁2

20 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC≈1,280 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• عن الأحنف أنّه قال: «لقد اختلفنا إلى قيس بن عاصم رضي الله عنه في الحلم، كما نختلف إلى الفقهاء في الفقه». [عيون الأخبار لابن قتيبة] ❁ مجالس السلف

21

19 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC≈2,280 views43 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• عن أبي الدرداء رضي الله عنه أنّه قال: «مَن لم يتعزَّ بعزّة الله تقطّعت نفسُه. ومن يُتبِع بصرَه فيما في أيدي الناس يطُلْ حزنُه. ومَن ظنّ أنّ نعمةَ الله في مطمعه ومشربه وملبسه (فقط)؛ فقد قلَّ علمُه، وحضر عذابُه». [الزهد لابن المبارك] ❁ مجالس السلف

43

18 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈2,180 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• عن أبي العالية أنّه قال: «إنّي لأرجو أن لا يَهلِك عبدٌ بين اثنتين: نعمةٍ يحمد الله عليها، وذنبٍ يستغفر منه». [الشكر لابن أبي الدنيا] ❁ مجالس السلف

36👍1🕊1

17 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC≈1,420 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• عن يحيى بن معاذ أنّه قال: «لا يزال العبد مقرونًا بالتواني؛ ما دام مقيمًا على وعد الأماني». [تاريخ بغداد] ❁ مجالس السلف

20💔7👍2

15 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,650 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026

‏﴿أَلَمْ تَرَ كَيْفَ ضَرَبَ اللهُ مَثَلًا كَلِمَةً طَيِّبَةً كَشَجَرَةٍ طَيِّبَةٍ أَصْلُهَا ثَابِتٌ وَفَرْعُهَا فِي السَّمَاءِ ❁ تُؤْتِي أُكُلَهَا كُلَّ حِينٍ بِإِذْنِ رَبِّهَا﴾ • قال الرَّبيع بن أنس: «كلَّ غدوةٍ وعشيَّة؛ لأنَّ ثمرَ النَّخلِ يؤكل أبدًا ليلًا ونهارًا، صيفًا وشتاءً، إما تمرًا أو رطبًا أو بُسْرًا. كذلك عمل المؤمن؛ يصعدُ أول النهار وآخره، وبركةُ إيمانه لا تنقطع أبدًا، بل تصل إليه في كلِّ وقت». [تفسير

42👍4

13 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC≈1,960 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• عن معاوية بن أبي سفيان رضي الله عنهما أنّه قال: «لا يَبلُغ العبدُ مبلغَ الرأي حتى يغلب حِلمُه جهلَه، وصبرُه شهوتَه، ولا يبلغ ذلك إلا بقوّة العِلم». [الحلم لابن أبي الدنيا] ❁ مجالس السلف

46💯2

12 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC≈1,890 views56 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• عن ابن مسعود رضي الله عنه أنّه قال: «مَن سرَّه أن يلقى اللهَ تعالى غدًا مسلمًا؛ فليحافِظ على هؤلاء الصلوات حيث يُنادى بهِنّ، فإنّ اللهَ شرع لنبيّكم صلّى ﷺ سُننَ الهدى، وإنّهنّ مِن سُنن الهدى. ولو أنّكم صلّيتُم في بيوتكم كما يصلّي هذا المتخلِّف في بيته، لتركتُم سنّةَ نبيّكم، ولو تركتم سنّةَ نبيّكم لضللتُم. ولقد رأيتُنا وما يتخلَّف عنها إلا منافقٌ معلومُ النفاق، ولقد كان الرجلُ يُؤتَى به يُهادَى بين الرجلين حتى يُ

51👍4👏1

9 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC≈2,050 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• قال ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما: «لَأن أَعُول أهلَ بيتٍ مِن المسلمين شهرًا أو جمعةً أو ما شاء الله أحبُّ إليّ مِن حَجّةٍ بعد حجّة. ولَطَبقٌ بدانقٍ أُهدِيه إلى أخٍ لي في الله أحبُّ إليّ مِن دينارٍ أُنفِقه في سبيل الله عزّ وجلّ». [حلية الأولياء] ❁ مجالس السلف

42👍4🍌1

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,020 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026

• عن عمر بن الخطاب -رضي الله عنه- أنه قال: «اللهمَّ اغفر لي ظُلْمِي وكُفري». فقال قائل: يا أمير المؤمنين هذا الظُّلم فما بال الكُفر؟ قال: «إنَّ الإنسانَ لظَلُومٌ كَفَّارٌ». [الدر المنثور] ❁ مجالس السلف

40👍3😢2🍌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @majals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@majals edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

• حَرْفٌ | 🌸
@haref2 · 34,952
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
أحمد الشامي.
@aladbalarba11 · 62,963
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مجالس السلف” (@majals), 8,650 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/majals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.