Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ARCHIVE STARS

Channel

ARCHIVE STARS

@makerrstars

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003591869143
TypeChannel
Username@makerrstars
Created11 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded15 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/makerrstars

Growth

510 September 2026 — 5 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5 subscribers10 September 202615 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 09:235no change
10 Sept 2026, 11:175first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18066.7%
avg views ÷ 5 subscribers
Avg views / post
903
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026
Posts held15 (11 August 202613 September 2026)
Views total2,710
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

13 Sept 2026, 16:52 UTC26 viewsread 15 September 2026
Photo

neh 600s seharga 165k mendarat sempurna bosku satset anti lelet

10 Sept 2026, 02:39 UTC≈2,610 viewsread 15 September 2026

halo disini saya mau klarifikasi sekaligus meluruskan beberapa masalah yang menimpa @makerrstars bahwa…. NJIR JUJURLY MAMALY MIYA TOS MURAH BET BJIRR TAU GAK DIA JUAL DIHARGA ASOY GEBOY BET AUTO BORONG BOS nih gua jabarin, buktinya? cek @Buktinor Sudah banyak bignom 50s 13.500 75s 20.300 100s 27.300 200s 54,500 500s 138.000 1000s 275.000 Telegram prem indo 50K buat Pu +1k Telegram prem luar 51K buat pu +1k Screen

20 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC147 viewsread 15 September 2026
Photo

hmm sedep bgt baru 8 hari sudah sebanyak ini bosku, terhitung dari 12 agust - 20 agust lancar jaya orderan, cus ke sini join harga murmer pisan euy https://t.me/+9pgPAplKh0M2Yzg1 https://t.me/+9pgPAplKh0M2Yzg1

13 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC316 viewsread 15 September 2026
Photo

alhamdulillah 750s seharga 206.250 mendarat sempurna bestie, tunggu apalagi? jom lah ke @makerrstars https://t.me/+9pgPAplKh0M2Yzg1 https://t.me/+9pgPAplKh0M2Yzg1

13 Aug 2026, 02:40 UTC303 viewsread 15 September 2026
Photo

alhamdulillah euyy trx udah sebanyak ini, big thanks yang udah percaya anak bujang ini. doain bsk kebeli palisade. WOK WEH ATUH CEPET BELI DI ABANG DEK

13 Aug 2026, 00:57 UTCviews —

ARCHIVE STARS pinned «BUJUG MURAH AMAT STARS, NIPU KALI?? YAELAH KAGAK MAEN MASA SEGANTENG GUE NIPU? DEMI PALISADE GLOWING ANTI NIPU COYY. DAH NIH LIAT NIH HARGANYA NIH BUJUG NGILER TENAN REK HARGA FIKS DI ABANG GANTENG 15 stars : 3.800 25 stars : 6.800 via gift…»

13 Aug 2026, 00:57 UTC256 viewsread 15 September 2026
Photo

gercep yo ah, 13.5/gift no cv. sebelum kehabisan yok

12 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC415 viewsread 15 September 2026

mau nyari maker stars yang murah? yang legal? yang on hand? yang fast? pas banget bjir disini bae dah. 50s 13.5 75s 20.7 100s 27.3 150s 41 200s 54.5 murahkan??? jadi yok kesini aja dijamin aman 100% karena legal paid, buruan order sebelum link di revoke dan promo habis. https://t.me/+9pgPAplKh0M2Yzg1 https://t.me/+9pgPAplKh0M2Yzg1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @makerrstars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ARCHIVE STARS” (@makerrstars), 5 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/makerrstars.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.