Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
47 measurements spanning 81 days, net -182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,588–10,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 19:37
10,615
-2
25 Oct 2026, 18:07
10,617
-2
24 Oct 2026, 19:56
10,619
-1
23 Oct 2026, 18:47
10,620
-2
22 Oct 2026, 21:27
10,622
+1
21 Oct 2026, 20:27
10,621
+3
20 Oct 2026, 15:48
10,618
-1
19 Oct 2026, 13:55
10,619
-2
18 Oct 2026, 12:10
10,621
-5
17 Oct 2026, 15:05
10,626
-6
16 Oct 2026, 17:37
10,632
-3
15 Oct 2026, 14:15
10,635
-3
13 Oct 2026, 01:56
10,638
-4
8 Oct 2026, 18:37
10,642
-8
4 Oct 2026, 11:16
10,650
-15
25 Sept 2026, 20:58
10,665
-14
19 Sept 2026, 08:17
10,679
-5
16 Sept 2026, 22:19
10,684
-3
14 Sept 2026, 22:18
10,687
-4
13 Sept 2026, 05:36
10,691
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 56 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 19s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
207 reactions across 41 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
125
60.4%
👍
38
18.4%
🔥
35
16.9%
😍
5
2.42%
🤩
2
0.966%
🥰
2
0.966%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Много воздуха, сложный цвет и архитектурные детали — квартира дизайнера Анны Зуевой построена именно на этом сочетании.
В гостиной главным фоном стал ARGILE C202 GIVRE — светлый, немного холодный оттенок, который поддерживает естественный свет и даёт яркому декору, искусству и винтажным предметам выйти на первый план. Архитектуру пространства усиливают элементы Orac: карнизы и молдинги добавляют стенам рельеф и помо…
Почему один и тот же цвет на стене и двери выглядит по-разному?
Показываем на примере Mid Azure Green от Little Greene: восприятие оттенка зависит не только от самого цвета, но и от степени блеска и фактуры покрытия.
На матовой стене Mid Azure Green выглядит более спокойным и глубоким. А на двери, плинтусе или встроенной мебели с более отражающим финишем тот же оттенок активнее взаимодействует со светом — блики под…
Новинка Dedar стирает границу между интерьерным текстилем и экспериментом с материалом.
Здесь два разных полотна соединяются так, что одно буквально перетекает в другое: плотная шерсть постепенно растворяется в лёгком натуральном шёлке, а на границе появляется мягкий градиент.
Для создания этого эффекта Dedar использует особую технику «ложной вышивки»: наложенные друг на друга ткани образуют единое полотно с бархат…
Один дом — восемь разных сценариев для стен!
В загородном проекте дизайнера Анастасии Извольской в Пестово не стали искать одни обои, которые подойдут сразу для всех комнат. Наоборот, для каждого пространства выбрали свой рисунок и фактуру, поэтому интересно наблюдать уже за самим процессом поклейки.
В проекте встретились сразу несколько известных брендов: York — коллекции Candice Olson Natural Discovery (NT6142) и…
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @manders_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@manders_ru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Идеи Вашего Дома @ivd_ru · 34,933 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
INMYROOM @inmyroom · 70,902 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
SKDESIGN • Дизайнерская мебель @skdesigntg · 25,254 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
divan.ru @officialdivanru · 61,334 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
💎الطَــツـرِيِـقُ إلى اْلْجَنَّـــةِ🎯 @JANNAH2015 · 46,242 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Manders” (@manders_ru), 10,615 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/manders_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.