https://www.threads.com/@margo.livay/post/Da9ksTLklWK?xmt=AQG0sCQn65ppUgYW0aayKezgrOt9zTxmglDOSvCpXVqbf5iH7uoTNJkA6Ge8nKEoorYsVQU&slof=1
❤🔥3custom 53639909738713024232custom 53643110305392336231custom 53664251766510798921

Channel
@margo_livay
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
596subscribers
-55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001985366989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @margo_livay |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/margo_livay |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 596 | -63 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 659 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 670 | +38 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 632 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 641 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 648 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 648 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 651 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
207 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 52 | 25.1% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 18.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 35 | 16.9% | |
| 🕊 | 28 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5363990973871302423 | 16 | 7.73% | |
| custom 5366425176651079892 | 13 | 6.28% | |
| 🗿 | 10 | 4.83% | |
| custom 5375562307256459527 | 9 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5364311030539233623 | 4 | 1.93% | |
| custom 5366178735722604128 | 2 | 0.966% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @margo_livay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 March 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://www.threads.com/@margo.livay/post/Da9ksTLklWK?xmt=AQG0sCQn65ppUgYW0aayKezgrOt9zTxmglDOSvCpXVqbf5iH7uoTNJkA6Ge8nKEoorYsVQU&slof=1
❤🔥3custom 53639909738713024232custom 53643110305392336231custom 53664251766510798921
Разбор с Василием Мещеряковым уже в записи. Тема — «Деньги в паре: как разговаривать о финансах без ссор». Гость — Василий Мещеряков, финансовый консультант, автор канала «Вася и финансы», бывший топ-менеджер Procter & Gamble с 15 годами управления. Помогает людям не просто вести бюджет, а выстраивать систему управления деньгами. Разобрали: - что общего между финансами и сек$ом - как защитить и сохранить свои сбер…
🔥6🕊3custom 53755623072564595272custom 53664251766510798921
Завтра в 14:00 по мск встречаемся на прямом эфире в YouTube Будем обсуждать: Что такое финансовая измена Что делать, если у партнёра тайные кредиты Общий счёт или раздельные карты Как поделить расходы при разных доходах Брачный договор - цинизм или зрелость Ставьте напоминалку и приходите за пользой 🚀
❤5❤🔥2🔥2🕊1custom 53639909738713024231custom 53643110305392336231
09 июля в 14:00 по мск - прямой эфир на YouTube. Ставьте напоминание прямо на трансляции — не пропустите начало: https://www.youtube.com/live/bqEWptwCaG8 Тема: «Деньги в паре: как разговаривать о финансах без ссор». Гость — Василий Мещеряков. 15 лет в реальном бизнесе, от торгового агента до директора по продажам Procter & Gamble с бюджетом 5 миллиардов рублей. Сейчас — финансовый консультант, разобрал 1000+ семей…
🔥8custom 53639909738713024235❤2custom 53664251766510798922custom 53755623072564595272
Практикум для экспертов - 14 дней «ПРОДУКТОВАЯ ЛИНЕЙКА ЭКСПЕРТА» Это программа для тех, кто уже что-то продаёт как эксперт - и понимает, что можно в 2-3 раза больше. Просто не понимает где. Программа родилась исходя из ваших вопросов ко мне перед эфирами и подкастами Что решаем за 14 дней: 1. Твоя продуктовая линейка - что реально работает, что тянет вниз 2. Портрет клиента - за что он платит на самом деле 3.…
🔥6🕊2custom 53755623072564595272❤🔥1custom 53639909738713024231
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥5custom 53664251766510798923🕊2🔥1
Друзья, открываю две позиции на июль. 🎙 Прямой эфир в моём YouTube — 2 места. Беру эксперта на 45 минут эфира. SEO-разбор темы, сценарий от моего сценариста, две обложки (вертикальи горизонт), анонс на 4 моих площадках (YouTube 16,6К + ВК 15К и тд). Эфир остаётся в канале навсегда и работает как ваш лид-магнит — приводит просмотры из поиска месяцами. 📈 Полное ведение как директор/продюсер — 1 место. С июля беру н…
❤3🔥2🕊2custom 53755623072564595271
Уже через 2 часа встречаемся в прямом эфире на YouTube с Маликой Шелаховой Ждем всех - https://www.youtube.com/live/lPK4cFiX2bA?si=cdXmWW_kcmlo1erI
❤2❤🔥2🔥1🕊1
Что делать, если ты уже добилась — а внутри тупик? Если деньги стоят. Если опыт огромный, а энергии всё меньше. Если ты уже не «начинающая», но и не «там, где хотелось». Это потолок после 40. И с ним можно работать. 9 ИЮНЯ · 16:00 МСК — прямой эфир со мной и Маликой Шелаховой, бизнес-психологом с 30-летним опытом. Работает с Росатомом, HeadHunter, Газпромнефтью, Кофеманией. Поговорим: → Реальный потолок vs выгора…
custom 53639909738713024233❤1🕊1custom 53664251766510798921custom 53755623072564595271
Ребятки, нас можно поздравить, сегодня один из наших роликов на Ютуб перевалил отметку 100 000 просмотров 💃💃💃 Сколько за этим скрывается кропотливой работы 🤪 Я благодарю вас, за вашу поддержку, за комментарии, за лайки 🫂🫂🫂 Я буду в Москве до 20 апреля, до этой даты кто хочет можем снять подкаст в мск 🎥🎥🎥 Пишите сюда @help_podcast
❤🔥7🔥4❤2🕊2custom 53643110305392336231
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5❤🔥2🔥2🕊1custom 53643110305392336231
Для тех, кто любит слушать Мы есть на Spotify - послушать подкасты тут
🔥4❤3❤🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @margo_livay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, сколько MAX было кредитов у клиентов Нины?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МАРГО ЛИВАЙ | Медиа | Бизнес | Влияние” (@margo_livay), 596 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/margo_livay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.