Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for маша мармарис печатает..

Channel

маша мармарис печатает..

@marmarrries

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

106,138subscribers

+22,943 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001436585931
TypeChannel
Username@marmarrries
Descriptionсотрудничество: @dinatimer проголосовать: https://t.me/marmarrries?boost регистрация канала: https://clck.ru/3GXKvx по разбану: @PSlX0 сотрудничество: @dinatimer
Created24 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/marmarrries

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

158,000 average views per post against 106,138 subscribers — an engagement rate of 148.6%. Across the 2,340 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,022–316,171 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.39% and 20.6%, with a median of 9.80%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,049,700
Mature posts only157.2% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers106,138 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb100000:rus · 2,340 channels · p10 2.03% · p25 4.39% · p50 9.80% · p75 20.6% · p90 32.9%
Position in cohort100.000th percentile · 15.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.276% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

83,195106,13894,666.56 August 2026 — 83,195 subscribers6 August 2026 — 83,214 subscribers7 August 2026 — 83,229 subscribers8 August 2026 — 83,323 subscribers9 August 2026 — 83,371 subscribers10 August 2026 — 83,378 subscribers11 August 2026 — 83,398 subscribers12 August 2026 — 83,441 subscribers13 August 2026 — 94,449 subscribers14 August 2026 — 96,995 subscribers16 August 2026 — 105,255 subscribers17 August 2026 — 104,937 subscribers18 August 2026 — 104,734 subscribers19 August 2026 — 104,661 subscribers20 August 2026 — 103,883 subscribers22 August 2026 — 103,736 subscribers23 August 2026 — 103,700 subscribers25 August 2026 — 103,674 subscribers25 August 2026 — 103,633 subscribers26 August 2026 — 103,596 subscribers28 August 2026 — 103,540 subscribers29 August 2026 — 103,500 subscribers30 August 2026 — 103,458 subscribers30 August 2026 — 103,460 subscribers31 August 2026 — 103,451 subscribers1 September 2026 — 103,421 subscribers2 September 2026 — 103,402 subscribers4 September 2026 — 103,387 subscribers6 September 2026 — 103,251 subscribers9 September 2026 — 102,926 subscribers12 September 2026 — 102,733 subscribers14 September 2026 — 102,770 subscribers15 September 2026 — 103,185 subscribers18 September 2026 — 103,196 subscribers29 September 2026 — 103,728 subscribers5 October 2026 — 103,592 subscribers9 October 2026 — 103,615 subscribers13 October 2026 — 103,829 subscribers14 October 2026 — 103,915 subscribers15 October 2026 — 103,950 subscribers16 October 2026 — 104,000 subscribers17 October 2026 — 104,237 subscribers18 October 2026 — 104,344 subscribers19 October 2026 — 104,495 subscribers21 October 2026 — 104,692 subscribers22 October 2026 — 104,980 subscribers23 October 2026 — 105,239 subscribers24 October 2026 — 105,394 subscribers25 October 2026 — 105,500 subscribers26 October 2026 — 105,624 subscribers27 October 2026 — 105,646 subscribers28 October 2026 — 105,649 subscribers29 October 2026 — 105,493 subscribers30 October 2026 — 105,402 subscribers31 October 2026 — 105,660 subscribers1 November 2026 — 105,796 subscribers2 November 2026 — 105,850 subscribers3 November 2026 — 106,004 subscribers4 November 2026 — 106,120 subscribers5 November 2026 — 106,138 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net +22,943. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79,754–109,579 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 05:50106,138+18
4 Nov 2026, 05:56106,120+116
3 Nov 2026, 06:47106,004+154
2 Nov 2026, 06:28105,850+54
1 Nov 2026, 08:46105,796+136
31 Oct 2026, 09:15105,660+258
30 Oct 2026, 11:59105,402-91
29 Oct 2026, 15:21105,493-156
28 Oct 2026, 12:26105,649+3
27 Oct 2026, 14:50105,646+22
26 Oct 2026, 16:19105,624+124
25 Oct 2026, 12:46105,500+106
24 Oct 2026, 11:46105,394+155
23 Oct 2026, 10:20105,239+259
22 Oct 2026, 09:17104,980+288
21 Oct 2026, 04:16104,692+197
19 Oct 2026, 23:08104,495+151
18 Oct 2026, 23:18104,344+107
17 Oct 2026, 21:34104,237+237
16 Oct 2026, 18:09104,000first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
151.4%
avg views ÷ 106,138 subscribers
Avg views / post
161,000
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held60 (18 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total2,089,100
Reactions total33,810
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,710
Videos
≈490
Links
≈252

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

185,289 reactions across 60 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.88% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524715280526476462614,6007.88%
custom 536403568018589495912,9707.00%
custom 52266229947338669567,2203.90%
custom 52534815297697345116,9503.75%
custom 52267488372756413876,3903.45%
custom 54047745101403456596,1603.32%
custom 53033276746666097665,0202.71%
custom 52268385376676173434,9602.68%
custom 53008933086780599214,7202.55%
custom 49092348587037172084,5902.48%
custom 51885333306723831584,1702.25%
custom 53075325550235561194,1002.21%
custom 52017455649028912773,7902.05%
custom 51928574994510217593,7202.01%
custom 54248768339863557143,6201.95%
custom 53233099112269823773,6001.94%
custom 52309505479467455333,5901.94%
custom 54270079538089321363,2801.77%
custom 54631566706097680683,2201.74%
custom 53142555489363712953,1801.72%
37 further kinds75,43940.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185,289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
863
across the posts below
Posts paid on
55
of 60 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
121
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marmarrries. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 60 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 11:56 UTC≈57,700 views1,230 reactions14 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

на днях пойдем на финальный скрининг и также заглянем в роддом, в котором оплачены роды. составила список покупок по советам из под старого поста, чтобы проконсультироваться со врачом по этому поводу. пока что, если кто разбирается, можете раскритиковать этот список: дополнить или ужать. буду признательна ☺️

custom 54001569177859626181,230

2 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC≈89,400 views1,680 reactions8 Starsread 5 November 2026

дорогие мамы, к вам вопросы личного характера 🥲 как вы начали рожать? при каких обстоятельствах это произошло? как добирались до роддома? сколько часов длились роды? были ли разрывы и (уж совсем личное) как произошел первый поход в туалет? безумно интересно почитать ваш индивидуальный опыт, буду признательна, если решите поделиться 🥰

custom 52986837283928943531,680

30 Oct 2026, 08:33 UTC≈155,000 views1,690 reactions13 Starsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52516688044627290991,690

29 Oct 2026, 09:37 UTC≈151,000 views2,450 reactions30 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

я такая потерянная тут, ахахах мама говорит, я была очень похожа на неё в детстве. интересно, Нина тоже такая будет?

custom 53888102627299978492,450

29 Oct 2026, 06:48 UTC≈137,000 views2,000 reactions35 Starsread 5 November 2026
Video

АХАХАХХАХА, Маш, забей 🕺

custom 53371140005408499092,000

28 Oct 2026, 10:52 UTC≈143,000 views2,630 reactions24 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

отзыв на третий триместр. - девятый месяц. 34ая эмбриональная/36ая акушерская неделя. за последние 2-3 недели живот уже значительно вырос. раньше казалось, что тяжело дышать - то были цветочки. вот теперь действительно тяжело дышать. • сплю плохо. просыпаюсь ночами, чтобы перевернуться на другой бок. переворот на другой бок теперь испытание 🫡 • матка давит на мочевой пузырь. постоянно кажется, что хочется в туалет…

custom 60510496294227193192,630

22 Oct 2026, 17:39 UTC≈203,000 views2,680 reactions101 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

этот обгар почти выносил со мной ребенка……. 🃏🫵😆

custom 52313048526838920372,680

18 Oct 2026, 17:18 UTC≈259,000 views3,220 reactions32 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

из последних новостей: немного украсили квартиру к нг, стало так радостно и дофаминово. в октябре рановато, конечно, но на данный момент я даже во время прогулок с Лирикой не могу дойти до конца двора, не посидев пару раз на лавочке. совершенно нет сил, тяжеловато дышать. потом, боюсь, совершенно не будет энергии и желания украшать. думаю, чуть попозже оформить стеллаж на кухне, чтобы тоже выглядело задорно научила…

custom 54631566706097680683,220

14 Oct 2026, 00:13 UTC≈272,000 views4,960 reactions85 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

не знаю, правильно ли высказываться второй раз. возможно, импульсивное решение. возможно, не стоит реагировать снова. первая реакция лишь усугубила ситуацию. но это уже просто выходит за рамки. мне обидно и гадко поскольку в тиктоке нельзя добавлять модераторов, доступ к моему аккаунту есть и у других людей, которые отвечают за фильтрацию нежелательных комментариев. комментарии с пожеланиями смерти, пожеланиями вык…

custom 52268385376676173434,960

13 Oct 2026, 08:15 UTC≈183,000 views3,280 reactions12 Starsread 30 October 2026
Photo

рисовали с Юликом персонажей по памяти. его Арнольд мой любимец 🤩

custom 54270079538089321363,280

12 Oct 2026, 15:15 UTC≈179,000 views1,940 reactions8 Starsread 29 October 2026
Photo

учусь вязать потихоньку. пока простые штуки. скоро придет специальная детская пряжа, попробую связать что-то для Нины. кто умеет вязать крючком, можете пожалуйста покидать какие-то прикольные уроки с мотивами для начинающих? я бы ей шапочку Шрека связала и пледик из бабушкиных квадратов. купила пару книжек, буду разбираться. может, кто может посоветовать хорошую пряжу? я купила детскую новинку, чат гпт сказал, что …

custom 59182733182170606301,940

11 Oct 2026, 15:28 UTC≈156,000 views3,100 reactions5 Starsread 22 October 2026
Photo

купили седня такой веселенький набор с крылышками, оч удобная коляска на фоне других юлик настоял на розовом цвете автолюльки. прикольно, что её можно вставить в шасси от коляски. также купили растущую кроватку с маятником и нежный комплект белья на первое время 🧐 на днях приедет доставка, всё установим, будет прикольно осталось с комодом решить, и в целом глобально вроде готовы.

custom 53371048651454089213,100

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @marmarrries. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @marmarrries as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
30 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTCAnonymous Poll99,500 voters approx.

последний шанс угадать 🥰

  1. мальчик 😎52%
  2. девочка 🤔48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,391,668
#1
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 198,437
#2
KOSTI
@kosti · 552,498
#3
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,093,467
#4
это всё лирика💖🛼
@etovselyryca · 7,811
#5
дед инсайд блонд
@deadblonde · 156,190
#6
Эвелинушка
@eveliinushka · 78,452
#7
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 415,094
#8
ул.Графская️👑
@graphdg · 110,645
#9
Любимый ВПШ 😮‍💨
@lyubimyivpsh · 142,215
#10
АКУЛИЧ
@akyulenokk · 256,321
#11
Вентилятор
@fanforfans · 50,152
#12
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 926,828
#13
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,439,513
#14
настя весвич круче всех
@vesvich · 13,757
#15
Неприятный канал
@unpleasent · 484,679
#16
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,535,796
#17
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,120
#18
айсберг @icceeeberg
@icceeeberg · 78,857
#19
Лисса Авеми
@LissaAveme · 91,061
#20
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 219,029
#21
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 3,900,305
#22
небога от бога
@neboga_ot_boga · 98,192
#23
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 267,940
#24
INSTASAMKA
@instasamkacore · 69
#25
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 399,997
#26
DILARA
@dilalara753 · 267,327
#27
всмысле Саша?
@nalunetelegram · 77,693
#28
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 731,393
#29
Философия Букера
@fedyabooker · 77,699
#30
дипинс 🤢
@deepinstv · 504,019
#31
мама в 16 Арина Кирсанов
@mama16arina · 39,291
#32
НЕКИЙ КАНАЛ🎬
@kanalnekiy · 179,001
#33
НМШ
@nmshhub · 673,151
#34
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 732,701
#35
Юлик
@juliusspeak · 108,785
#36
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 385,016
#37
КК
@petrovtel · 542,721
#38
GSPD
@gspd2000 · 148,465
#39
Anton Vlasov
@TrudovoyDrive · 57,757
#40
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 906,174
#41
Кишлак
@kishlak_family · 263,404
#42
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,107,105
#43
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 234,380
#44
GB FAMILY
@GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 94,185
#45
【HELLSVIIDS】🔖🖌
@hellsviids · 7,577
#46
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,046,676
#47
Клоунада
@clownblogers · 113,287
#48
Нежные стримы Кузьмы
@kuzmastream · 34,216
#49
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,693,403
#50
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 487,959
#51
Кореш
@koreshzy · 818,748
#52
Тесты и точка.
@test_dot · 509,669
#53
SHTOLL NEWS💋
@SHTOLLNEWS · 515,764
#54
4ch
@why4ch · 1,023,537
#55
ЛСП
@lspof · 108,338
#56
ЮГ 404
@ug_404 · 73,096
#57
ох
@theohdaily · 171,885
#58

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

векши
@vekshy08 · 31,089
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 September 2026
небога от бога
@neboga_ot_boga · 98,192
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
ул.Графская️👑
@graphdg · 110,645
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
Лисса Авеми
@LissaAveme · 91,061
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 August 2026
гот стиль бля
@gothstyle_blya · 165,690
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 September 2026
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 198,437
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
лиззка
@cringeahoy · 33,899
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 September 2026
Любимый ВПШ 😮‍💨
@lyubimyivpsh · 142,215
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
Юлик
@juliusspeak · 108,785
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
Неприятный канал
@unpleasent · 484,679
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,120
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
Elmofeo Life
@elmofeo_life · 25,366
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026
НЕКИЙ КАНАЛ🎬
@kanalnekiy · 179,001
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
KOSTI
@kosti · 552,498
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 August 2026
дед инсайд блонд
@deadblonde · 156,190
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
маркус тут
@markkalinin · 29,209
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 15 September 2026
Егор Украинец Турбо
@egorafullhd · 43,498
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 September 2026
EkaterinaKoreaTG
@ekaterinakoreatg · 112,195
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 August 2026
КК
@petrovtel · 542,721
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 August 2026
Это Лиза
@etolizochka · 115,776
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

vk.ru3 posts · 27 July 2026 – 27 July 2026 · example post
vk.com1 post · 27 July 2026 – 27 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“маша мармарис печатает..” (@marmarrries), 106,138 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marmarrries.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.