Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Марпл в ЛС

Channel

Марпл в ЛС

@marplevls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,493subscribers

+128 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374119891
TypeChannel
Username@marplevls
Created17 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/marplevls

Growth

10,34210,49310,417.56 August 2026 — 10,365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,365 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,372 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,376 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,377 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,380 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,378 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,376 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,374 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,379 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,376 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,370 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,369 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,362 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,353 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,381 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,400 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,405 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,423 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,424 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,437 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,433 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,484 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,490 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,493 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 27 days, net +128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,319–10,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 13:0410,493+3
1 Sept 2026, 10:5710,490+6
31 Aug 2026, 09:4810,484+51
30 Aug 2026, 09:4410,433-4
29 Aug 2026, 11:4910,437+13
28 Aug 2026, 10:1310,424+1
27 Aug 2026, 11:2310,423+18
26 Aug 2026, 13:0310,405+5
25 Aug 2026, 12:4310,400+19
24 Aug 2026, 14:1610,381+39
22 Aug 2026, 23:1510,342-11
21 Aug 2026, 14:3710,353-9
20 Aug 2026, 12:0410,362-7
19 Aug 2026, 09:1610,369-1
17 Aug 2026, 12:0610,370-6
16 Aug 2026, 03:1810,376-3
14 Aug 2026, 13:4610,379+5
13 Aug 2026, 01:1410,374-2
12 Aug 2026, 02:2310,376-2
11 Aug 2026, 01:5110,378first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.5%
avg views ÷ 10,493 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,930
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held51 (22 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total213,480
Reactions total10,157
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 18s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,478 reactions across 43 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,73567.4%
❤‍🔥1,80315.7%
🔥8407.32%
😁3643.17%
🥱1431.25%
🤯1411.23%
🥰1100.958%
🙏710.619%
🦄550.479%
💯510.444%
🤣440.383%
👍290.253%
😱200.174%
🤔130.113%
🍌110.096%
🕊100.087%
🏆90.078%
😎70.061%
🎉60.052%
😢60.052%
4 further kinds100.087%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,765 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 51 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marplevls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,870 views118 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Приготовьте ваши библетумбы🥹 И обязательно накидайте в комментариях респектов Славику и Димону за этот трусайт!❤️ https://youtu.be/Lh8tM5U-l0o?si=xZlgOkiFCIfu2INQ

101❤‍🔥7🔥5🥱2🍌1🥰1😁1

26 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈5,060 views200 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

156🔥19❤‍🔥16🍌4🤣3💔2

25 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈6,240 views528 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

9 лет муж и жена - одна сатана🤘🏼 Каждый день люблю еще больше❤️

425🦄53❤‍🔥43🔥4🥰3

24 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈6,860 views139 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Mrs.Marple: Puppey | TI15, тренерство, Satanic, музыка и жизнь на чилле Говорят, что стабильность — признак мастерства. В случае нашего гостя это не душное клише, а буквальное описание его карьеры. Он отыграл 12 лет за один клуб, посетил 12 турниров серии The International и попал в топ-8 на каждом из них, причём в этом году — впервые в роли тренера. Встречайте — Клемент Puppey Иванов! https://youtu.be/2kmn4luFTVw?

113🔥18😁5❤‍🔥3

24 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC≈6,370 views295 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

КОРОЛЯ НЕ УБИТЬ!

🔥20875❤‍🔥9🥰2🤩1

24 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈6,340 views123 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Пока мы все осмысляем произошедшее, новый выпуск ис каминг! В ожидании рекомендую вам пересмотреть наши интервью с трехкратными чемпионами инта) https://youtu.be/e4Aswwei0F8?si=5lYOxgVYIHxq1l9r https://youtu.be/FZeEBvp3d_E?si=VDFQnA3M-penbo6F

108❤‍🔥13🔥2

24 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC≈6,210 views582 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026

Доброе утро, ребят, нам не приснилось🥹 прикиньте

❤‍🔥435108🥱17🔥13🙏6🦄2🤯1

23 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈6,910 views413 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @n23manufacture

Это лучшая организация в мире ❤️

❤‍🔥31369💯30🥱1

23 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈7,160 views568 reactionsread 29 August 2026

ЕЩЕ ОДНА ТАРЕЛОЧКА АААААААА С ДНЕМ ТИМ СПИИИРИИИТ!!!

466❤‍🔥65🥰34😁2🥱1

23 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈7,580 views337 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Завтра

273🤣41🔥12❤‍🔥3🍌3😢3🤩1🤯1

23 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC≈4,500 views307 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Team_Spirit_OfficialVideo

Video, posted without a caption

228😁53❤‍🔥19😎7

23 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈7,020 views498 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Я ЩАС УМРУ АААААААА ТРИ АЕГИСА ААААААА

405🔥67❤‍🔥26

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @marplevls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,781 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Team Spirit
@Team_Spirit_Official · 232,886
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
CYBERSLOVO
@cyberslovo · 42,232
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
chopper:O
@chopperis · 114,600
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
КиберМетаГейминг | Индустрия
@esportsindustry · 41,058
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Ramzi666
@Ramzesasd · 118,365
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Team Spirit CS2
@TSpiritCS · 223,157
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
BETBOOM Esports CS2
@betboom_esports_cs · 122,017
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
dyrachyo
@dyrachyo · 213,358
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
HULIGANI
@L1GATEAM · 44,936
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Nix
@nixtalk · 263,229
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Марпл в ЛС” (@marplevls), 10,493 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marplevls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.