Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
48 measurements spanning 79 days, net +6,912. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,157–26,693 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 13:15
25,169
-6
23 Oct 2026, 13:17
25,175
-5
22 Oct 2026, 11:05
25,180
-15
21 Oct 2026, 02:27
25,195
-20
20 Oct 2026, 01:11
25,215
-19
19 Oct 2026, 02:48
25,234
-10
18 Oct 2026, 02:56
25,244
-4
17 Oct 2026, 05:25
25,248
-11
16 Oct 2026, 03:05
25,259
-7
15 Oct 2026, 03:48
25,266
-6
13 Oct 2026, 22:38
25,272
+64
10 Oct 2026, 13:54
25,208
-48
6 Oct 2026, 10:16
25,256
-87
1 Oct 2026, 11:57
25,343
-120
18 Sept 2026, 09:20
25,463
-53
16 Sept 2026, 03:21
25,516
-20
14 Sept 2026, 07:00
25,536
-11
12 Sept 2026, 13:02
25,547
-13
10 Sept 2026, 13:19
25,560
-22
7 Sept 2026, 05:57
25,582
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.7%
avg views ÷ 25,169 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,500
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held
36 (27 June 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total
25,020
Reactions total
1,168
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 09:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
28,434 reactions across 36 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
22,041
77.5%
❤🔥
2,415
8.49%
🥰
1,254
4.41%
😁
689
2.42%
💘
477
1.68%
🔥
330
1.16%
👀
323
1.14%
😭
214
0.753%
👍
197
0.693%
🤡
80
0.281%
😈
69
0.243%
🐳
51
0.179%
🤩
51
0.179%
🤣
39
0.137%
💔
37
0.13%
👏
32
0.113%
🆒
26
0.091%
🎉
21
0.074%
💯
20
0.07%
🤔
12
0.042%
9 further kinds
56
0.197%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,434 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 36 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
34
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @art1stcs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 19 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Че вы тут, лучшие пользователи интернета, как оно?
Покатали шары недавно с лучшими друзьями, было весело 😎
По новостям: завтра летим на ББ покер с Яриком + Магой, ожидайте контент! Постараюсь для вас что-то интересное подснять 🤨
По возвращению домой, собираюсь плотно постримить, круто, да? ✋
ЛАНов в доте довольно мало, а по каким-то активностям уже скучаю, поэтому ожидайте, друзья
Media day ✅
Записали для вас контент!
Два развлекательных + один на серьезном (там супер интересно получилось, ожидайте)
Пообщались с ребятами, завтра у них праки, а послезавтра вылетают на Бласт 😳
Я, к сожалению, не полечу, но буду жестко болеть за них из Белграда!!
Ура, дома! 🥳
Я понимаю, что вы все хотите увидеть победный влог, друзья
Но! У нас там 4 игры, + одна из них бо5, везде тим спики + спич Ярика перед играми
Мы хотим сделать очень красиво, поэтому чуть-чуть терпения! 👀
Эмоции парней там безумные, это стоит того, чтоб еще подождать!
Закупились в сикрет шопе сегодня, ну так, чуть-чуть
Обзорчик будет в третьем влоге!
Второй влог выйдет уже вот-вот, там полтора часа контента, приготовьте себе чай, печенье, пельмени, салат, ну разберетесь там 😳
Фух, плей-офф ✅
После первых трех игр в группе, ожидали, что выйдем в разы быстрее
Парни сейчас рефрешнутся пару дней и продолжим выступление уже на арене
Влог монтируется, выпустим в ближайшие дни 😳
❤491❤🔥79👀39🥰6👍3🐳2
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @art1stcs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Mira @miradoto · 51,428 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Miposhka @miposhqa · 57,486 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
Старший по доте @korb3ndetka · 26,422 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
Глупости Анастейши @nastyamulla · 32,344 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
sony9sha @sony9sha_aa · 76,550 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
collapse1221 @TScollapse1221 · 95,760 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
гет борис @getboris · 81,852 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Yatoro @Yatorokale · 119,691 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
chopper:O @chopperis · 110,765 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Team Spirit @Team_Spirit_Official · 236,813 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
sikle\dota.vpk @sikleqq · 24,101 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
TORONTOTOKYO @torontotokyo · 22,883 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
ULTIMATE Dota 2 @ultimatedota · 25,162 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
Team Spirit CS2 @TSpiritCS · 225,453 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Puredota @puredota187 · 20,222 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 September 2026
sh1ro @sh1rocs2 · 71,756 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
gpk @gpk_dota2 · 29,826 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
dyrachyo @dyrachyo · 204,429 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
BETBOOM Esports Dota 2 @betboom_esports · 164,797 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Телега Маелшторма @maelstormone · 34,100 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
BETBOOM Streamers Battle @betboomstreamersbattle · 111,617 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Ramzi666 @Ramzesasd · 115,648 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Сельский Стас @malr1neDotes · 26,860 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
BETBOOM TEAM @betboomteam · 75,192 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Закулисье Артиста” (@art1stcs), 25,169 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/art1stcs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.