Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Машериша (Masherisha)

Channel

Машериша (Masherisha)

@masherisha_art

Not marked by Telegram, checked 23 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,456subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002222721400
TypeChannel
Username@masherisha_art
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/masherisha_art

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,3768,4568,4167 August 2026 — 8,403 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,404 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,416 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,401 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,402 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,394 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,403 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,396 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,383 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,376 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,400 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,456 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,364–8,468 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 04:218,456+56
12 Sept 2026, 19:008,400+24
8 Sept 2026, 08:588,376-7
2 Sept 2026, 21:548,383-13
30 Aug 2026, 12:488,396-7
27 Aug 2026, 03:048,403+9
23 Aug 2026, 23:578,394-8
20 Aug 2026, 12:068,402+1
14 Aug 2026, 19:368,401-15
11 Aug 2026, 08:258,416+12
8 Aug 2026, 08:318,404+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:168,403first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 43s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,694 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,07163.2%
🔥25815.2%
custom 541339205707709430020111.9%
🥰935.49%
👍281.65%
👀120.708%
🤔120.708%
🙏90.531%
🤯50.295%
😐40.236%
10.059%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,694 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
10.0%
1 of 10 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,550
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,230
over 9 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGYvHvh120 August 202620 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC≈2,400 views152 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Жаль, что cider ко мне на рекламу не придет 😂 А то у меня уже коллекция их кофт собралась, и каааждый раз они вызывают восторг и вопросы))) Беру на озоне, там очень легко найти ⏺ с блузками осторожнее, да и всей одеждой тоже, на самом деле - у меня есть блузка и свитер, которые я использую только для видео, так как для постоянного ношения они мне дискомфортны из-за материалов.

🥰9144👍11custom 54133920570770943006

20 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈2,550 views90 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGYvHvhPhoto

Ещё не доделала листья, уже покупаю материалы для следующего ИИ-Арт-Контроля😂 Отсняла в Москве всё необходимое, осталось совсем немного🙏🏻 Я каждый раз много вожу туда-сюда, и чтобы все было по местам, беру с собой свой любимый рюкзак Soft Daypack xd design. У него много карманов, чтобы все аккуратно разложить и легко достать в любой момент. При этом модель Bobby Soft люблю не меньше, а Рома так вообще ходит с ним

76custom 54133920570770943006😐4👍2🥰2

14 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC≈4,310 views525 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ну что за принцесса Солярии у нас🥹🥹🥹 На солнце ее волосы просто золото🫠 Уже явно пора стричь, но как вообще такое можно стричь😭😭😭 А когда они от влажности завиваются в естественные локоны, это вообще💔💔💔

351custom 5413392057077094300113🔥55👍51

11 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈4,660 views157 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

100🔥39custom 541339205707709430018

9 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈5,410 views194 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Неделя на даче пронеслась незаметно, и мы опять едем на 2 дня в Москву. Я очень впечатлена земляникой, прям очень. Я уже смирилась с тем, что собирала по 5-10 ягодок, зато на протяжении всего лета! А тут вернулись после моей поездки, а на грядке целая тарелка ягод! А через пару дней ещё баночку собрала! Вау. Из плюсов - у неё нет отдельных усов, как у клубники. Но веточки, на которых растут ягоды и под их весом при

🔥11753custom 541339205707709430024

4 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈4,530 views129 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Вчера как раз заливала листья для гирлянды и сделала края у больших листьев. Мне очень смешно от слова Анбабл😅 Делаю красивые кадры и показываю, как снимаю близкие кадры. Когда времени мало, планирую действия так, чтобы максимально использовать каждую минуту. Работает дегазатор - я мажу листья. Листья в лампе - я заливаю смолу из дегазатора🫙

94🔥21custom 541339205707709430014

4 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈3,230 views125 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Решила рассказать, какие видео будут на обзоре в выпуске АК про листья. А то вчера в комментарии прислали просьбу разобрать как раз тот видос, который я и взяла за основу) Всё началось с 1 видео, это наш главный герой, скажем так. Вообще, я сначала думала только на этом и остановиться, но потом решила, что для формата АК (динамично и без размусоливаний), одного разбора будет мало, и на тот момент мне очень удачно п

98🔥17custom 541339205707709430010

2 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈2,440 views119 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Нужно ваше мнение. Села писать текст для АК и загрузилась капитально. 🧩 Тезис 1 Выпуск про листья я хочу начать с видео вот про этот лист, которое мне прислали в предложку. Глядя на это видео, мне видно, что за кадром там дофига работы проделано, чтобы лист выглядел идеально. 🧩 Тезис 2 Обычно я ругаюсь на контент фермы за то, что их видео создают иллюзию того, что все делается легко и просто. 📒 Вопрос А это видео

88👀12🤔12🤯5👍2

1 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC≈2,810 views118 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Первая стабилизация гортензии - провал. Почти провал, точнее. Потому что лепестки всё-таки набрали глицерина, но при этом пожелтели. При естественной сушке в темноте они так не желтеют! Они остаются белыми. Из возможных ошибок - я поставила в слишком теплый раствор. Глицерин нужно разводить в горячей воде, и я долго ждала остывания. Но поставила в теплую, не до конца остывшую воду. Считается, что для гортензии по

96🔥9🙏9👍4

31 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC≈2,710 views85 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Стратсессия FitStars закончилась, и я вернулась домой с кучей мыслей. Помимо тренировок, это большое мероприятие для общения и обмена опытом. Я в этот раз мало общалась, но очень много слушала и думала. (Моя ютуб сис тут вне категории❤️‍🔥) Я не уверена, что смогу описать весь тот поток мыслей, что бурей проходил через меня, но главный вывод я сделала такой: я выбрала себе путь, я знаю, что там будет успех, поэтому

71custom 541339205707709430010👍4

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @masherisha_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fancy smth
@fancysmth · 48,168
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
Pankova Home 🏠
@PankovaHome · 60,699
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Машериша (Masherisha)” (@masherisha_art), 8,456 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masherisha_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.