Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 72 days, net -136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,566–60,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Oct 2026, 00:04
60,686
+4
17 Oct 2026, 22:57
60,682
+3
16 Oct 2026, 20:07
60,679
-3
15 Oct 2026, 17:44
60,682
-9
14 Oct 2026, 15:40
60,691
-6
13 Oct 2026, 02:36
60,697
+94
8 Oct 2026, 20:37
60,603
-8
4 Oct 2026, 10:58
60,611
-42
25 Sept 2026, 20:35
60,653
-46
19 Sept 2026, 01:41
60,699
-21
16 Sept 2026, 17:01
60,720
-14
14 Sept 2026, 18:17
60,734
+11
13 Sept 2026, 04:58
60,723
+10
11 Sept 2026, 10:01
60,713
+19
8 Sept 2026, 15:16
60,694
-16
5 Sept 2026, 10:17
60,710
+2
3 Sept 2026, 15:18
60,708
-17
2 Sept 2026, 09:13
60,725
-13
1 Sept 2026, 10:55
60,738
-1
31 Aug 2026, 13:42
60,739
first reading
Engagement
172 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 151 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 60,686 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,300
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 172 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held
172 (5 August 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total
821,180
Reactions total
39,679
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Oct 2026, 20:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 52s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
114,010 reactions across 172 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
38,889
34.1%
👍
29,947
26.3%
🔥
22,495
19.7%
😁
4,531
3.97%
🥰
3,721
3.26%
❤🔥
2,858
2.51%
🤣
2,171
1.90%
😱
1,651
1.45%
💯
1,114
0.977%
🙈
973
0.853%
😍
760
0.667%
👌
635
0.557%
😢
605
0.531%
🤔
552
0.484%
😈
468
0.41%
🎉
321
0.282%
😭
300
0.263%
🙏
287
0.252%
👏
251
0.22%
🤪
207
0.182%
30 further kinds
1,274
1.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114,010 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 172 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PankovaHome. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 172 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 16 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.49%
6 of 172 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
6
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
11,700
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
12,400
over 166 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjd1J6Yj
1
16 September 2026
16 September 2026
2Vtzqvfnzdp
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
2Vtzqvr5nSQ
1
30 September 2026
30 September 2026
2VtzqxcQxXw
1
14 October 2026
14 October 2026
2W5zFJX5iPb
1
2 October 2026
2 October 2026
2W5zFJvd6Mw
1
23 September 2026
23 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Пятница, плед, что-нибудь горячее в кружке и старый добрый фильм или сериал, который всегда приятно пересмотреть 🍪
Собрала небольшую подборку именно таких: красивых, атмосферных и очень осенних 🤎
Сохраняйте на ближайшие вечера, а в комментариях делитесь своими любимыми фильмами с осенней эстетикой. Пополним список вместе 🍂
Делюсь с вами ссылкой на чудесную лампу за 721 руб. 👇
https://ozon.ru/t/dwqKcn3
Ждала долго, но оно того стоит. Правда я думала, что лампа будет беспроводная, оказалось не так. Купила для спальни, чтоб перед сном не включать яркий свет и плавно уходить в сон.
В будущем планирую заменить абажур, когда этот надоест. Но придется купить новый каркас, потому что этот сделан специально для гармошки.
Сегодня в #хвасты переделка, которая началась сразу с серьезного испытания! 😅
Нашей подписчице достался старый советский сервант, и именно он стал ее первым опытом реставрации мебели.
Изначально хотелось сохранить красивую текстуру дерева, поэтому хозяйка вооружилась смывкой и шлифмашинкой, сняла старое покрытие и решила затонировать шпон в графитовый оттенок.
Но тут все пошло не по плану. Масло легло пятнами, и в…
Зеркало-кокошник 💙
Посмотрите, как это необычно и красиво!🔥
Автор давно мечтала о зеркале в форме кокошника, но готовые варианты никак не устраивали. Поэтому она решила не искать компромиссов и сделать все своими руками! Думаю, это многим из вас знакомо 😅
И вот что получилось: глубокий синий бархат, красные бусины, сверкающие камни, затейливые узоры и даже подвески из прозрачных бусин вокруг самого зеркала ✔️
Даж…
Когда все для ремонта можно найти в одном пространстве 💙
Знакомая боль: ремонт идёт, а вы всё ещё колесите по городу в поисках нужной плитки или оттенка краски. А мебель? Это вообще отдельный квест.
Я знаю, как это выматывает. И как же хочется, чтобы всё самое важное собрали под одной крышей, чтобы вы могли сосредоточиться на главном: на создании своего идеального пространства, а не на бесконечных поездка 🏠 😅
«Куба…
Ну и что за красота такая!?
Давно мы с Пашей вдвоем не работали. А так хорошо и весело)
Правда пока клали плитку, словили вьетнамские флэшбеки. Помните, как нам пришлось отдирать от плитки полкомнаты, потому что ничего не приклеилось? Вот мы помним 😅
Поймала себя на мысли, что многие пары не могут работать вместе. А мы наоборот, как два слипшихся пельмешка. Странные такие.
А вы можете работать вместе со второй по…
А вот еще одна переделка, которую хозяйка задумала больше года назад и наконец воплотила в жизнь! 😍
За шесть лет деревянная столешница в ванной потеряла свой первоначальный вид, и вместо того чтобы просто обновить покрытие, автор решила выложить ее мозаикой!
В ход пошли листы белой мозаики, эластичный клей, эпоксидная затирка и несколько декоративных плиточек с рисунками в стиле азулежу. На всю работу вместе с высы…
А вот ответ на вопрос: «Зачем менять временную столешницу на другую временную столешницу?».
Столешница из пористого материала разбухла от воды и химии. Меня дико раздражала эта ситуация. К тому же очень хотелось поменять мойку на что-то побольше.
У нас осталась плитка от пола в ванной, почему бы не попробовать сделать столешницу из плитки? Купили клей, затирку и новую мойку. Вот уже клеим плитку, надеюсь все получи…
Еще одна недоделка, которую очень хотелось сделать.
Будем менять столешницу на нашей кухоньке. Вместе с тем заменим и мойку. Купила недорогую, симпатичную и побольше, чем была. Будет гораздо удобнее и практичнее.
Из старой кровати в новый диван ❤
А у нас тут очередное доказательство, что дать второй шанс мебели никогда не поздно ⤵️
У подписчицы осталось деревянное основание от старой советской кровати. И вместо того чтобы отправить его на свалку, она решила сделать из него полноценный диван!
Для спинки и боковин пригодились детали от старого шкафа, матрас уже был, а купить пришлось только поролон, ткань и деревянные ножки.…
Вы нередко задавали вопросы о заземлении. В нашем старом доме его нет, хотя это очень важный момент безопасности!
Делать заземление достаточно заморочено. Нужно выкапывать в земле глубокий треугольник, закладывать туда металлические штыри и подключать кабель заземления. Как раз из-за всех этих сложностей, мы так и не подошли к этому процессу.
Но тут Паша нашел другой способ. Оказывается можно вбить в землю длинный-…
Ахах 🤣 было бы неплохо. Но нет.
Мышка самоубилась в тот же вечер, не дожидаясь гуманной мышеловки 🫠
Мы уезжали на весь день. Все же оставили обычную мышеловку и кусочек сыра. Вообще ни на что не рассчитывали. Вернулись, а мышка все. Так что гуманную мышеловку испытать не удалось.
Больше мы мышей не встречали. Но на всякий случай все же поставим такую ловушку с попкорном.
На подземную отдельную жилплощадь они вряд…
😁378❤80👻20🤝9🦄2
Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @PankovaHome. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@PankovaHome edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 October 2026
Most recent edit
3 October 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Канал «Дом быта» @dmbt_media · 45,384 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
Kempel.yulia @ebanistaru · 27,098 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
Жизнь между городом и дачей @city_and_house · 19,374 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 October 2026
Просто Ремонт @prostoremont · 34,466 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Fancy smth @fancysmth · 48,062 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
Игорь Мёдов @igor_medov · 66,328 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 21 August 2026
Яна Круглова @yanakruglovayoutube · 22,445 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
INMYROOM @inmyroom · 70,928 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Клуб zhenya_prorab @zhenya_prorab · 51,855 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Журнал «Петрович.Знает» @znaet_petrovich · 50,144 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
ДАНЯ В ДЕЛЕ 🎥 @DANYAVDELE · 19,908 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 30 September 2026
Интерьерная копилка @interior_collection · 59,889 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 August 2026
КАК ЖИВУТ ДРУГИЕ. Оля Качанова @kakzhivutdrugie · 66,669 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
Екатерина Гурьянова @ekaterina_guryanova · 39,151 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
savelenok @savelenok · 37,012 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
Бюро ARCHWOOD_дизайн интерьеров @archwood · 20,998 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
NatashkaPLUS @NatashkaPLUS · 57,411 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
stalinka_na_mojaike @stalinka_na_mojaike1 · 125,670 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Вася на сене @vasya_nasene · 129,554 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
VadimAlesya_Key @vadimalesyakey · 36,987 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pankova Home 🏠” (@PankovaHome), 60,686 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PankovaHome.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.