Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net +224. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,834–11,987 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 13:36
11,236
-9
4 Nov 2026, 10:26
11,245
-6
3 Nov 2026, 11:30
11,251
-7
2 Nov 2026, 12:45
11,258
-4
1 Nov 2026, 12:24
11,262
-8
31 Oct 2026, 11:59
11,270
-18
30 Oct 2026, 13:48
11,288
-5
29 Oct 2026, 14:40
11,293
-15
28 Oct 2026, 13:38
11,308
-11
27 Oct 2026, 10:36
11,319
-13
26 Oct 2026, 13:06
11,332
-6
25 Oct 2026, 09:38
11,338
-7
24 Oct 2026, 11:55
11,345
-20
23 Oct 2026, 09:36
11,365
-9
22 Oct 2026, 10:52
11,374
-13
21 Oct 2026, 01:37
11,387
-17
19 Oct 2026, 21:44
11,404
-9
18 Oct 2026, 22:27
11,413
-7
18 Oct 2026, 01:01
11,420
-15
17 Oct 2026, 01:01
11,435
first reading
Engagement
117 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 11,236 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,950
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 117 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
117 (29 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
38,980
Reactions total
969
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
7,200 reactions across 116 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,907
54.3%
👍
1,063
14.8%
💔
825
11.5%
👏
280
3.89%
👎
218
3.03%
💯
195
2.71%
🔥
185
2.57%
👌
147
2.04%
🤝
84
1.17%
😢
73
1.01%
❤🔥
71
0.986%
😍
59
0.819%
🤔
32
0.444%
🕊
19
0.264%
⚡
15
0.208%
🆒
7
0.097%
🏆
6
0.083%
🙏
5
0.069%
🐳
3
0.042%
🥰
3
0.042%
2 further kinds
3
0.042%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 116 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,200 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (38.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
دوستانی که اپ بله دارن میتونن از طریق لینک پایین وارد کانال مسیرتو در بله بشن که در صورت قطعی اینترنت ارتباطمون قطع نشه:
ble.ir/join/AvfCetq7Pj
ble.ir/join/AvfCetq7Pj
«کانال بله» فقط برای شرایط خاصه که ارتباطمون حفظ بشه و قبل و بعد از این شرایط، اونجا فعالیتی نخواهیم داشت.
حالا که بحث اهمیت یادگیری زبان انگلیسی شد، فرصت خوبیه که یه کانال که در اون زبان انگلیسی به شکلی متفاوت و با عشق و علاقه آموزش داده میشه رو هم بهتون معرفی کنم که اینم داشته باشید.
این پیام هم حمایت از تیمیه که کارش رو خوب و حرفهای انجام میده و هم شاید بهانهای برای شروع یادگیری زبان انگلیسی و یا تقویتش توسط اعضای مسیرتو.
لرنیتو، آیندهٔ روشن زبان تو:
🆔 @Learnito_Academy
🎯 در شرایط فعلی که پر از ابهام و عدم قطعیت هست، بهترین استراتژی چیه؟!
در حالت عادی که همه چی سرجاشه، اگه مراقب نباشیم و انرژی صرف نکنیم و انضباط نداشته باشیم، با توجه به جذابیت عادات منفی، زندگی ما بهسمت بینظمی و انجام کارهای کماهمیت یا بیاهمیت و یا کارهای غیر مفید با لذت فوری میره.
در شرایط فعلی که اغلب افراد تحت فشار مالی و روانی هستند و هر لحظه ممکنه اتفاقاتی در کشور رقم بخوره که تمام جنبههای زندگیمون تحت …
اصل پارتو یا همون قانون ۲۰-۸۰ هم جاهای مختلف کاربرد داره و بسیار مهمه و در مورد بهرهوری شخصی، میگه که ۸۰ درصد نتایج ما، حاصل انجام ۲۰ درصد از کارهاییه که انجام میدیم.
جالب شد...
دنبال فرصتی بودم که در مورد این جمله و قانون پارکینسون(کارها به اندازهای که براشون زمان داریم طول میکشن!) بنویسم که بهطور اتفاقی توی کتاب «هفتهٔ کاری ۴ ساعته» که مشغول خوندنشم، به مطلبی در مورد همین موضوع رسیدم که در پایانش هم یه نکتهٔ جالب و کاربردی رو بهش اشاره کرده.
عکس این قسمت کتاب رو در پست بعدی ارسال میکنم.
🍔🧠 مراقب ذائقه و خوراکهامون باشیم!
🚨 طبقهبندی: تعیینکننده!
خوراکی که مصرف میکنیم و عادات غذایی ما بسیار مهم هستند:
کافیه یه مدت با غذا نوشابه بخوریم، از یه جا به بعد، خوردن غذا بدون نوشابه واقعا سخت میشه.
کافیه عادت کنیم به مصرف نمک زیاد؛ بعد از مدتی هر کی میزان مصرف نمکمون رو ببینه تعجب میکنه.
کافیه یه مدت چای رو داغ و با قند زیاد بخوریم، بعد از مدتی میبینیم با یه لیوان چای ده تا قند میخوریم و اعتقاد…
ساعت اتوماتیک و آیندهٔ هوش مصنوعی و اتوماسیون
حتماً داستان ساعتهای اتوماتیک و کوارتز رو شنیدین (توی استراتژی به یکی از کیسهای کلاسیک تبدیل شده).
وقتی ساعتهای کوارتز (که با باتری کار میکنن) اومدن، برای همه قطعی بود که ساعت اتوماتیک برای همیشه جمع میشه. نماد ساعت اتوماتیک سوییس بود و نماد ساعتهای کوارتز ژاپن.
بهنظر میرسید سوییس داره بازی رو به ژاپن (که اون زمان الههٔ تکنولوژی، روباتیک، و الکترونیکی کردن همه…
اما چرا این عکس رو توی کانال گذاشتم...
حرفهایها و احتمالاً قدیمیترهای باتجربه میدونن که برای اینکه بتونن بهترین کیفیت نان رو از ساج(همین ظرف فلزی مشکی در تصویر) بگیرن بهتره کاری کنن که حرارت ساج ملایمتر باشه که نان سریع نسوزه و کمکم پخته و آماده بشه.
کاری که قدیمیها انجام میدادن این بود که یک لایهٔ نازک گِل، زیر ساج که سمت آتیشه ایجاد میکردن تا یهجورایی زور آتیش رو بگیره و این انتقال حرارت ملایمتر صورت ب…
این خوراکی که دوستان به اسمش و نحوه خوردنش در مناطق مختلف کشور اشاره کردند، یه نوع نون نازک و نرمه که از خمیری شُلتر از خمیر نون درست میشه. ترکیب خمیرش در بیشتر جاهایی که من دیدم(مناطق غربی و جنوب کشور) آرد و نمک و آبه. در مناطق غربی مثل ایلام و کرمانشاه و کردستان و لرستان فکر میکنم بیشتر با روغن یا کره محلی و شیره خرما یا انگور و البته با پشتیبانی سنگین و بیوقفهٔ دوغ خورده میشه و واقعاً خوشمزه است. احتمالاً خیلی…
Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @masiretoCom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @masiretoCom as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
8.8 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Official Fitness @OfficialFitness · 27,309 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
آموزش فن بیان سخنرانی 🎤 @BahaminDadras · 80,950 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
نشر میلکان | Milkan @nashremilkan · 32,082 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Sina Bathaie @sinabathaieofficial · 55,262 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
کانال کتاب @ketab · 74,101 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MasireTo | مسیرِتو” (@masiretoCom), 11,236 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masiretoCom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.