Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مدیریت MBA/DBA

Channel

مدیریت MBA/DBA

@mba0dba

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,124subscribers

+2,743 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001521148365
TypeChannel
Username@mba0dba
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mba0dba

Growth

4,3817,3455,8637 August 2026 — 4,381 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,381 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,414 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,345 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,304 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,274 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,225 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,195 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,178 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,171 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,155 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,124 subscribers7,1247 August 20266 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net +2,743. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,936–7,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 18:417,124-31
1 Sept 2026, 21:337,155-16
29 Aug 2026, 22:587,171-7
26 Aug 2026, 23:097,178-17
23 Aug 2026, 21:247,195-30
20 Aug 2026, 09:117,225-49
17 Aug 2026, 19:357,274-30
14 Aug 2026, 18:277,304-41
10 Aug 2026, 22:427,345+2,931
8 Aug 2026, 00:114,414+33
7 Aug 2026, 12:174,381no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:074,381first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 11 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.18%
avg views ÷ 7,124 subscribers
Avg views / post
583
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.199%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held22 (11 December 202519 August 2026)
Views total1,166
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC503 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🔳 فرق دانش و هوش: دانش، داشتن پاسخ درست است در حالیکه هوش، پرسیدن سوال درست است. @MBA0DBA

👍1

19 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC663 viewsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @kmccompanyPhoto

⭕️ شرایط فروش کی ام سی ایگل(KMC EAGLE ) ▫️قیمت: ۲،۴۸۲،۵۰۰،۰۰۰ تومان ▫️پیش پرداخت: ۱،۵۰۰،۰۰۰،۰۰۰ تومان مشاهده شرایط فروش

3 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC990 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔳 بهترین و تأثیرگذارترین رهبران، تقریباً همیشه ۶ روش کلاسیک و پایه را دنبال می‌کنند: 1- متحد کردن کارمندان / اعضای تیم، پیرامون یک چشم‌انداز جالب و مشتاق کننده 2- ساخت یک استراتژی برای رسیدن به این چشم‌انداز، یعنی فراهم کردن گزینه‌های مختلف برای کارهایی که باید یا نباید انجام شود. 3- جذب و توسعه‌ی بهترین نیروهای مستعد و در دسترسی که به اجرای استراتژی کمک می‌کنند. 4- تمرکز همیشگی بر نتایج استراتژی 5- تأکید بر نوآوری

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC978 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔳 از صدایتان به درستی استفاده کنید کلمات گفتاری به تنهایی ابزار قدرتمندی برای برقراری رابطه نیستند زیرا فقط پنج حس مخاطب را درگیر می‌کنند. به همنین دلیل است که ارائه دهندگان از جلوه‌های بصری هم استفاده می‌کنند. اما می‌توانید بهتر از کلمات گفتاری از طریق صدای‌تان استفاده کنید. تمایز سرعت در نوع کلامتان، و تاکید بر روی تغییرات در آهنگ کلام کمک خواهد کرد که صدایتان جالبتر به نظر آید و توجه مخاطب را جلب کند @MBA0DBA

👍2

26 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC976 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔳 ارزشمندترین هدیه در دنیای مدیریت: «شفافیت در بازگو کردن اشتباهات» ✅بسیاری از مدیران و سازمان‌ها، موفقیت‌های خود را ویترین می‌کنند؛ اما رهبران بزرگ و سازمان‌های یادگیرنده، جسارت صحبت درباره‌ی «اشتباهات و تصورات غلط» خود را دارند. ✅وقتی همکار، رقیب یا مشاور شما از اشتباهات و تحلیل‌های نادرستِ گذشته‌ی خود می‌گوید، در واقع ارزشمندترین هدیه مدیریتی را به شما داده است. چرا؟ 💡 چرا شنیدن اشتباهات دیگران یک مزیت رقاب

👍1

13 Jul 2026, 19:41 UTC908 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔳بیشتر افراد طبق علایق و خواسته‌های دیگران زندگی می‌کنند. علاقه و اشتیاق خود را انتخاب کنید، شغلی را پیدا کنید که انجام آن برایتان مثل تفریح و سرگرمی باشد! روزی که کار شما برای‌تان مثل تفریح باشد، روزی است که شما طعم واقعی موفقیت را خواهید چشید... وارن بافت @MBA0DBA

👍2

11 Jul 2026, 18:28 UTC888 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔳کارها را به اجزای کوچک‌تر آن تقسیم کرده و درصورتی‌که می‌توانید برخی از آن‌ها را واگذار کنید. آیا واقعاً نیاز است که کل کار بلافاصله انجام شود؟ و آیا واقعاً باید بخش‌هایی از آن انجام گیرند؟ گاهی اوقات واگذاری کار می‌تواند به‌اندازه‌ی انجام دادن آن زمان ببرد، به‌خصوص هنگامی‌که خود کار زمان زیادی نمی­‌گیرد اما زمانی نیز صرف توضیح دادن آن به‌منظور واگذاری می‌شود. بااین‌حال، درصورتی‌که توضیح دادن آن ساده ولی انجام دادن

👍2

3 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC949 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔳 آنچه قدرتمندترین شرکت‌های جهان را از سایرین متمایز می‌کند، استراتژی‌های هوشمندانه و صحیح تیمی و وضوح بخشیدن به چشم‌انداز نهایی است. @MBA0DBA

👍1

20 Jun 2026, 09:28 UTC978 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔳اگر دو کار را مهم و ضروری دید و انجامشان را به زمان دیگری محول کردید، گرفتار تعویق و پشت گوش انداختن شده‌اید. دقت کنید که عادت به پشت گوش انداختن کارها یکی از بزرگترین موانع بر سر راه توسعه فردی شماست و باید با جدیت به دنبال کنار گذاشتن آن باشید. به تعویق انداختن، دزد زمان است. @MBA0DBA

👍2

8 Jun 2026, 09:56 UTC983 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔳 بهترین و تأثیرگذارترین رهبران، تقریباً همیشه ۶ روش کلاسیک و پایه را دنبال می‌کنند: 1- متحد کردن کارمندان / اعضای تیم، پیرامون یک چشم‌انداز جالب و مشتاق کننده 2- ساخت یک استراتژی برای رسیدن به این چشم‌انداز، یعنی فراهم کردن گزینه‌های مختلف برای کارهایی که باید یا نباید انجام شود. 3- جذب و توسعه‌ی بهترین نیروهای مستعد و در دسترسی که به اجرای استراتژی کمک می‌کنند. 4- تمرکز همیشگی بر نتایج استراتژی 5- تأکید بر نوآوری

👍1

7 Jun 2026, 05:53 UTC880 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔳درآمد ماهيانه تون روبا اين روش بودجه بندى كنيد و عاقلانه خرج كنيد. ٥٥٪‏ نيازهاى اوليه ١٠٪‏ تفريحات ١٠٪‏ پس انداز دراز مدت ١٠٪‏آموزش ١٠٪‏ هزينه هاى شخصى ٥٪‏ خيريه و هديه @MBA0DBA

👍1

1 Jun 2026, 19:49 UTC918 viewsread 20 August 2026

🔳اگر دو کار را مهم و ضروری دید و انجامشان را به زمان دیگری محول کردید، گرفتار تعویق و پشت گوش انداختن شده‌اید. دقت کنید که عادت به پشت گوش انداختن کارها یکی از بزرگترین موانع بر سر راه توسعه فردی شماست و باید با جدیت به دنبال کنار گذاشتن آن باشید. به تعویق انداختن، دزد زمان است. @MBA0DBA

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @mba0dba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

معصومه لشکری|روانشناس
@masumeh_lashkari · 42,671
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
قدرت ذهنی
@ghodratehzehne · 47,097
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مدیریت MBA/DBA” (@mba0dba), 7,124 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mba0dba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.