معصومه لشکری|روانشناس pinned a photo

Channel
معصومه لشکری|روانشناس
@masumeh_lashkari
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,335subscribers
-913 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001848756083 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @masumeh_lashkari |
| Description | #معصومه_لشکری روانشناس و نویسنده شماره دفتر:02144385637 02140440867 #زوج_درمانی #نوروتراپی با ما سلامت روان و رابطه ی خود را بیمه کنید وبسایت رسمی استادلشکری👇 http://masoumehlashkari.com |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/masumeh_lashkari |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 42,335 | -98 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 42,433 | -62 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 42,495 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 42,506 | -121 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 42,627 | -44 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 42,671 | -58 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 42,729 | -59 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:07 | 42,788 | -40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:06 | 42,828 | -28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 42,856 | -41 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 42,897 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 42,904 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 42,919 | +11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 42,908 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 42,895 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 42,906 | +83 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 42,823 | +122 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 42,701 | -112 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 42,813 | -49 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 42,862 | first reading |
Engagement
170 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.00%
- avg views ÷ 42,335 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,690
- 107 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.71%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 108
- of 170 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 93 of 107 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 170 (8 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 181,144 |
| Reactions total | 2,665 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 01:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 78
- Videos
- 33
- Links
- 68
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 8m 56s
- Average length
- 54s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,179 reactions across 147 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 1,406 | 33.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 879 | 21.0% | |
| 👌 | 614 | 14.7% | |
| 👍 | 572 | 13.7% | |
| 🥰 | 148 | 3.54% | |
| 🔥 | 112 | 2.68% | |
| 💔 | 104 | 2.49% | |
| 🙏 | 75 | 1.79% | |
| 🕊 | 66 | 1.58% | |
| 😍 | 44 | 1.05% | |
| 🗿 | 32 | 0.766% | |
| 😁 | 26 | 0.622% | |
| 🫡 | 24 | 0.574% | |
| 💋 | 20 | 0.479% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 0.431% | |
| 🤨 | 12 | 0.287% | |
| 🤷 | 10 | 0.239% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 0.168% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.096% | |
| 🤷♀ | 4 | 0.096% | |
| 1 further kind | 2 | 0.048% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 147 of the 170 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
بعضی زخمها با دعوا شروع نمیشن؛ با سکوت، فاصله و حسِ «دیگه منو نمیبینه» شروع میشن… اگر این متن یه جای دلت رو لرزوند، تنها از کنارش رد نشو. روی لینک زیر بزن و وارد چکاپ رابطه شو؛ شاید اولین قدم برای نجات رابطهت باشه. https://survey.porsline.ir/s/Yz89oszt
👍5
اولین واکنشت چیه؟ ۱) میمونم و برای رابطه تلاش میکنم 🤍 ۲) میرم و جدا میشم فقط عدد ۱ یا ۲ رو بفرست 👇 @Saadat_poshtiban
🕊7
یه سؤال واقعی مخصوص خانمها 🌿 فرض کن فقط یک سال از زندگی مشترکت گذشته و یهو حس میکنی همسرت اون آدمی نیست که فکر میکردی…
🕊5
سلام جانانم، سلام به لیدیِ قدرتمند 🌿 امروز منتظر نمان کسی حال دلت رو خوب کنه؛ خودت شروعکنندهی حال خوبت باش. چهارشنبه یعنی هنوز فرصت داری این هفته رو به نفع خودت تغییر بدی. 👑
🥰28
این روزها توی محل کار، همراه با تیمم حسابی درگیر چکاپ رابطههای شما عزیزانیم… 🤍 یه چیز جالبی که داریم میبینیم اینه که با اینکه داستان زندگی هر کدوم از شما متفاوته، اما چند تا چالش بین خیلی از خانمها مشترکه. و من دلم نمیخواد این چالشها رو با خودتون ببرید به نیمهی دوم سال… گاهی پایان نیمهی اول سال، فقط یه تاریخ روی تقویم نیست؛ یه فرصته برای اینکه بگیم: «این قسمت از زندگی من، دیگه قرار نیست ادامه پیدا کنه.» 🌱 …
👏24
شش ماه اول سال تو چطور بود؟
- کلی رشد کردم23%
- خیلی سخت گذشت44%
- هیچ هدفی نداشتم8%
- میخوام از صفر شروع کنم13%
- دوره لیدی سنس رو خریدم 🙂19%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
شش ماه از سال گذشته آیا این شش ماه تونستی به چیزی که دوس داری نزدیکتر بشی؟
😁16
ولی میخوام یه نکته رو بدونی انسان آگاه فرقش با انسان معمولی اینه که آماده اس که همیشه نهایت استفاده رو از زندگیش ببره در اصل هر روز واسه اینکه به بهترین خودش تبدیل بشه آگاهتر میشه، آگاهتر از خودش از زندگیش از اطرافیانش از اهدافش
🥰9
همه رنگی توی پاییز هست ، هم شادی هست هم رنج هم لذت هست هم غم
👍18
رفقای جان امروز آخرین روز فصل تابستونه و ما وارد فصل پاییز میشیم فصلی که رنگ و بوش فرق داره
سلام به روی ماهتون
🥰13
Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @masumeh_lashkari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@masumeh_lashkari edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 20 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 20 August 2026
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
شش ماه اول سال تو چطور بود؟
- کلی رشد کردم23%
- خیلی سخت گذشت44%
- هیچ هدفی نداشتم8%
- میخوام از صفر شروع کنم13%
- دوره لیدی سنس رو خریدم 🙂19%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ما به کی ناآگاهیم
- به همسر یا پارتنر10%
- به خودمون35%
- به خودِ حقیقت عشق11%
- هر سه گزینه54%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
کدومشی👇🏻
- من اینطوریم72%
- من اقتدار زنانه دارم28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدوم گزینه در مورد شما صدق میکنه⁉️⁉️⁉️
- ۱-احساس میکنم همسرم چیزهای مهم زندگیش رو ازم پنهان میکنه56%
- ۲-بيشتر صحبت هاى ما درباره كارهاى روزمره و مسئوليت هاست46%
- ۳- وقتی همسرم ناراحته، بیشتر راه حل میدم تا به حرفاش فکر کنم23%
- ۴-گاهی در كنارهم هستيم اما هركدوممون مشغول موبايل وكار خودمون هستيم60%
- ۵- آخرين بارى كه فقط براى لذت بردن از بودن كنارهم وقت كذاشتيم ،يادم نیست کی یوده40%
- ۶- خيلى وقته درباره احساسات واقعىمان باهم صحبت نكرديم54%
- ۷-بيشتر درباره وظايفمون حرف مى زنيم تاخودمون و رابطمون44%
- ۸- اگر از من ببرسند : اين روزها همسرت از چه جيزى ناراحته يا خوشحال میشه شايدجواب دقيقى نداشته باشم40%
The shares total 363%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
از کارگاه لیدی سنس چیزی نشدی
- اره تهیه اش کردم54%
- نه نمیدونم چیه46%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تو کدومش رو داری
- زیادی توقع داری18%
- همش دنبال توجهی33%
- زیادی حساسی64%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@m_a_s_o_u_di · 37,861#1
@saeedeh_banoo · 19,064#2
@khodeto_bavarkon · 5,678#3
@parisanasri · 126,740#4
@erteashe_ezdevaj · 2,852#5
@ganje222 · 12,503#6
@afarinesh_jazb · 760#7
@metafizik_fengshoi · 1,333#8
@fatemeh_jafarnia · 44,676#9
@tamrinejazb98 · 2,030#10
@ramzkodbavre · 3#11
@masumehlashkari · 4,872#12
@sara_moughaddam77 · 734#13
@elm_jazb · 779#14
@drhanasabzadeh · 9,174#15
@panah · 17,594#16
@Audio_ketaban · 2,432#17
@ElhamGhaed_Academy · 4,563#18
@alfredname · 10,484#19
@faezehfattahii · 4,659#20
@matnvasharee · 409 (as read 28 August 2026)#21
@DeyaAirdrop · 73#22
@NewJeansFolder · 106#23
@archivespiritualsm · 1,146 (as read 28 August 2026)#24
@Reza_growth · 1,473#25
@sobhtoos · 3,870#26
@mahziar_saljooghi · 2,309#27
@nedakhaleghimusic · 178 (as read 28 August 2026)#28
@atefehcrossstitch · 1,803#29
@harim_dle · 312 (as read 28 August 2026)#30
@lionsperoxi · 501#31
@metis_547 · 253#32
@AkhtareShargh · 2,451#33
@sahaarssoul · 3,169#34
@txtafg · 184#35
@tehranimjf · 962 (as read 28 August 2026)#36
@taranh101 · 1,751#37
@bigdark_coin · 237#38
@khuztab · 2,287#39
@nezam_kermanshah · 658#40
@adad_shans · 2,624#41
@hafeziha77 · 1,769#42
@BoyeAtr_khoda · 7,275#43
@mba0dba · 6,980#44
@METAPHYSICCCCC · 11,923#45
@mahdibaghdar · 47,255#46
@potography_ideaa · 9,808#47
@tabdilvaziyat · 5,593#48
@mArtwork001 · 2,124#49
@narimanyqurn · 2,180#50
@nahangx · 153,848#51
@metroshahr · 383#52
@agahimah · 290#53
@Saeeid2102137841 · 115#54
@shahedbaneh1396 · 596#55
@qodratEsokut · 6,233#56
@maysam3245 · 2,296#57
@tarhimromeshka · 1,353#58
@stretchFit03 · 1,269#59
@npvt_configs_ir · 7,314#60
@oxfordwordskillsbasic1 · 6,551#61
@shafaye_rabete · 587 (as read 28 August 2026)#62
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@m_a_s_o_u_di · 37,861
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 September 2026
@parisanasri · 126,740
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
@mahdibaghdar · 47,255
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
@fatemeh_jafarnia · 44,676
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
@hananehraesi · 59,556
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معصومه لشکری|روانشناس” (@masumeh_lashkari), 42,335 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masumeh_lashkari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.