Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mc2 - Место силы

Channel

mc2 - Место силы

@mc2_prod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,038subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001779340994
TypeChannel
Username@mc2_prod
DescriptionCINEMA IS PUNK❗️ Официальный канал продакшна «Место силы» Номер заявления РКН: № 6620396718 https://mc2production.ru Для связи: @mc2_production Бот «Чёрный ящик mc2»: @black_box_mc2_bot 18+
Created6 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mc2_prod

Growth

10,00410,10210,0536 August 2026 — 10,102 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,102 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,095 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,082 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,072 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,066 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,057 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,044 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,037 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,022 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,014 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,004 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,027 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,025 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,006 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,012 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,060 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,054 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,046 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,038 subscribers10,0386 August 202625 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 20 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,989–10,117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 23:3410,038-8
24 Aug 2026, 23:3510,046-8
23 Aug 2026, 11:2610,054-6
21 Aug 2026, 20:3710,060+48
20 Aug 2026, 17:4310,012+6
19 Aug 2026, 15:1310,006-19
18 Aug 2026, 17:3210,025-2
17 Aug 2026, 20:4510,027+23
16 Aug 2026, 17:3810,004-10
15 Aug 2026, 01:0610,014-8
13 Aug 2026, 13:4810,022-15
12 Aug 2026, 14:1510,037-7
11 Aug 2026, 16:3110,044-13
10 Aug 2026, 19:1810,057-9
9 Aug 2026, 17:4210,066-6
8 Aug 2026, 17:3510,072-10
7 Aug 2026, 15:0710,082-13
6 Aug 2026, 16:4010,095-7
6 Aug 2026, 02:4810,102no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:1910,102first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.1%
avg views ÷ 10,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,430
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.938%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held24 (20 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total75,300
Reactions total706
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,320
Videos
254
Links
578

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

955 reactions across 21 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31232.7%
🔥19920.8%
❤‍🔥9910.4%
😁747.75%
🙏434.50%
👍293.04%
💯282.93%
🤩262.72%
😭191.99%
🍾151.57%
💩141.47%
😱131.36%
121.26%
🥰121.26%
🕊111.15%
🤝111.15%
🍓101.05%
💘40.419%
🤨40.419%
🤮40.419%
8 further kinds161.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 24 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mc2_prod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈3,560 views35 reactions3 Starsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Привет! Это Место силы. Сегодня, в День российского кино, хочется не просто рассуждать о его настоящем и будущем, а сохранить все эти мысли, эмоции, переживания — хотя бы для самих себя. Поэтому предлагаем вам оставить небольшое послание себе в будущее. Вы можете написать о фильме, который сейчас занимает особенное место в вашем сердце, о том, чего вы ждёте от российского кино и каким видите будущее нашей индустрии

🍾1312🔥10

24 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,250 views17 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Если бы вам предложили попасть внутрь любого фильма всего на один ужин — без последствий для сюжета, зато с реальной едой, — за чей стол вы бы сели, с кем и почему? Part 2 Я, как южанин по происхождению, первым делом вспомнил «Горько!» — интересно, что это говорит обо мне? Ну да ладно, если серьёзно, то я бы обратился к анимации, а именно — к «Рататую». Дело в том, что я ни разу не ел рататуй, который по вкусу был

🍓8🔥53🤝1

24 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,200 views18 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026
Photo

Привет. Это Место силы. Сегодня отвлечёмся от серьёзных тем и представим, что у нас есть всего один ужин в мире любого фильма — без последствий для сюжета, зато с реальной едой. Представители киноиндустрии в нашей рубрике «5 мнений» рассказали, за чей стол сели бы они и почему. Читайте ниже! А c кем поужинали бы вы?🍴 - Гарольд! - Шрек! - Фиона! - Фиона! - Мама! - Гарольд! - Осёл! Айя! Я бы выбрала тот самый семе

8❤‍🔥4😁4🍾2

21 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,130 views43 reactions2 Starsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Привет. С вами Ежов, и сегодня хочу обсудить, когда открытый финал работает, а когда выглядит так, будто автор просто не придумал концовку. В обсуждении открытых финалов в кино часто путают, собственно, открытый финал и фильм без финала. Скажем, множество работ Линча, Кауфмана или Рефна заканчиваются, в общем-то, ничем — потому что они вообще рассказывают не конвенциональную историю, в которой финал не играет своей

20👍10🔥10💯3

20 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,330 views74 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026
Photo

Искусство требует жертв. В нашем случае — буквально. Привет! На связи Алёна Садырина, скрипт-супервайзер первого сезона сериала «Гипнозис». Сегодня хочу рассказать, на что иногда приходится идти ради одного маленького элемента в кадре. Моя работа обычно никак не связана с художественной частью съёмок. Но я очень люблю рисовать, поэтому, когда для одной из сцен нам понадобился нарисованный паук, я буквально выпросил

🔥3520😱13😁5💔1

17 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈5,110 views33 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Почему зрители часто не доверяют российскому кино ещё до просмотра? Part 2 🐘 Этим вопросом я задаюсь много лет, но когда пытаюсь поговорить об этом, люди будто не замечают слона в комнате. А он становится всё больше. И БОЛЬШЕ. Размышляя о ситуации, когда зритель хмурит лицо при одном упоминании любого российского фильма, я нашёл для себя три причины этого неприятного явления: 1. Русский ментальный код. Так сложи

15🔥13💯5

17 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,990 views19 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Привет. Это Место силы. К отечественному кино зрители нередко относятся строже, чем к зарубежному — ещё до просмотра. Почему? Сегодня в рубрике «5 мнений» разбираемся в этом вместе с представителями киноиндустрии. А что думаете вы? Делитесь в комментариях! Part 1 Я сама отчасти такой зритель. Оговорюсь, что есть много великолепных российских фильмов и сериалов, которые я обожаю. Но каждый раз, когда я думаю, чт

9🔥5💯3🤝2

12 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,850 views47 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026
Photo

Постер «ДЫШИ» кинокритики и киноблогеры назвали одним из лучших среди российских фильмов и сериалов 2020-х🔥 Также коллеги отметили постер «КОНЧИТСЯ ЛЕТО». Эта новость нас, конечно, порадовала, а заодно заставила задуматься, какие постеры назвали бы мы. Выбрать оказалось непросто, поэтому выносим вопрос на обсуждение в комментариях: какой лучший и худший постер запомнился вам? Российский рынок коллеги уже обсудили,

🔥2510🤩8👍3💩1

11 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,830 views35 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

17 августа в киноклубе музея AZ «Образ жизни» пройдёт показ нашего фильма «КОНЧИТСЯ ЛЕТО»🎞️ После просмотра состоится обсуждение с кинокритиком Ларисой Малюковой о том, как жить среди тех, кто не принимает тебя и считает чужим; можно ли сбежать от самого себя и начать новую жизнь, если прошлое не отстает, и кто же герои картины на самом деле — преступники или жертвы обстоятельств. Билеты и подробности — на сайте му

16❤‍🔥8🔥7👍2💩1🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,960 views43 reactions2 Starsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! На связи Женя Лесниченко, VFX-супервайзер «Волшебного участка». Сегодня хочу рассказать про забавную пасхалку из нашего сериала, которую мы придумали, чтобы повеселить команду. Помните сцену из третьей серии первого сезона? Михалыч спрашивает Лёху, что подсказывает ему расследовательская чуйка, что он чувствует. Лёха отвечает: «Духи какие-то бабские». Михалыч обижается и уточняет, что это аромат «Одер

21🔥12😁8👍2

7 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,900 views90 reactions10 Starsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Я некомпетентна вообще во всем. Всем привет, это Янина Костицына, и давайте потрындим за опыт сценариста. Часто преподаватели, киноделы и другие сценаристы говорят «пиши о себе». Никто не объясняет, что это значит, но все с умным видом кивают, мол да-да, вы правы… А потом, когда человек садится что-то писать… он задается вопросом «а что именно писать»? Объективно говоря: наша жизнь скучна. Не писать же автобиографи

44🔥23❤‍🔥11👍4🦄4💯2🥰2

6 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,700 views37 reactions2 Starsread 26 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥1412😁11

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @mc2_prod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 18,576 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ШОУРАННЕР
@iamshowrunner · 50,042
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
KinoReel
@kinoreel · 51,486
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
Okko Кино
@okkomovies · 118,273
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
КИОН
@kionru · 68,846
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Иви | О кино, фильмах и сериалах
@official_iviru · 62,872
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Некинокритик 🎬
@ne_kinokritik · 50,387
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 123,913
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mc2 - Место силы” (@mc2_prod), 10,038 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mc2_prod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.