Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кино_Ёж

Channel

Кино_Ёж

@Film_hedgehog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,264subscribers

-77 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185042770
TypeChannel
Username@Film_hedgehog
DescriptionАнонимно и с иголками Связь со мной: @ksifb12 РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/679289e919290c0f93631b66
Created25 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Film_hedgehog

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,25710,34410,300.56 August 2026 — 10,341 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,341 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,343 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,344 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,338 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,332 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,330 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,325 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,318 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,315 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,312 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,309 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,305 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,300 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,299 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,298 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,294 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,291 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,290 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,288 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,300 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,305 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,307 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,304 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,298 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,299 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,300 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,296 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,293 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,291 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,288 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,283 subscribers26 September 2026 — 10,257 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,258 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,268 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,265 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,269 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,267 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,266 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,270 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,271 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,268 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,270 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,274 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,272 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,276 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,277 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,278 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,277 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,276 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,278 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,269 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,266 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,268 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,265 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,264 subscribers10,2646 August 20268 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 94 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,244–10,357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 01:1110,264-1
6 Nov 2026, 19:3710,265-3
5 Nov 2026, 21:5610,268+2
5 Nov 2026, 00:5910,266-3
3 Nov 2026, 22:2610,269-9
2 Nov 2026, 19:0810,278+2
1 Nov 2026, 21:1610,276-1
31 Oct 2026, 20:1810,277-1
30 Oct 2026, 19:5910,278+1
29 Oct 2026, 16:2910,277+1
28 Oct 2026, 16:3710,276+4
27 Oct 2026, 19:4810,272-2
25 Oct 2026, 20:5710,274+4
24 Oct 2026, 20:2610,270+2
22 Oct 2026, 15:0610,268-3
21 Oct 2026, 07:0610,271+1
19 Oct 2026, 06:1810,270+4
18 Oct 2026, 07:0610,266-1
17 Oct 2026, 09:2710,267-2
16 Oct 2026, 11:5610,269first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 10,264 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,950
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held63 (25 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total35,055
Reactions total663
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 21:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,000
Videos
≈613
Links
≈1,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 05s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,373 reactions across 62 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,02543.2%
😁73130.8%
🔥25910.9%
👍1586.66%
😢1275.35%
🤯371.56%
👎241.01%
😱120.506%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,373 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 17:36 UTC925 views38 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Традиционное. Пятничное «Если я не буду протирать звезды каждый вечер» — думал ежик — «они обязательно потускнеют...»

❤19😢12👍3😁3😱1

6 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC≈1,150 views37 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Подслушано: — А какой у проекта рейтинг? — 4.8 — Это сахар в крови таким должен быть, а не рейтинг

😁29❤8

5 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,380 views23 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Ситуация: вы планируете делать проект, в партнерстве с человеком, которого не переносит на дух ваша женщина. А он, кстати, ее. Тому, в общем-то, пох (джаст бизнес), а ваша — ест вам мозг, по этому поводу. Уважаемые знатоки, вопрос: Как, в таком случае, поступить? Слушать свою женщину, и «рядом срать не садиться, с этим гандоном на одном поле» (цитата по первоисточнику); или делать свою работу, но женщина будет это…

😁18❤3🤯2

5 Nov 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,460 views25 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Сценарный нетворкинг А давайте сделаем пост для сценаристов. В комментарии пишите кратко, кто вы, что вы пишете/написали, по каким форматам к вам можно обращаться или, что уже есть из готового. А продюсеро-режиссерские люди (а может, и другие сценаристы), читают и, факультативно, по своему усмотрению, возможно (но, это не точно), что-то для себя найдут и с вами познакомятся

❤20🔥5

4 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,570 views25 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Видос из присланного. Не соглашусь, с закадровым комментарием девушки, не думаю, что им похуй. Думаю, что конкретно исполнителю (эти ваши нейросети, б-р-р-р) похуй, либо, он некомпетентное чмо. А дальше, по цепочке: тот, кто должен был проверить за исполнителем все детали — не проверил. Старшие согласовали плакат по общему кадру с телефона (где не будет видно никаких пальцев), так и пустили в тираж. Артефакты нов…

😢24👎1

3 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC≈1,560 views19 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Досмотрел «Трудно быть богом». В целом, понравилось. Есть пара комментариев, но я их сам передал создателям. Федр Сергеич, говорил, что это самый сложный сериал в его продюсерской жизни. Моё мнение локальное — было бы здорово, если бы сам ФСБ срежиссировал подобное. Обождем.

🔥14👎4😁1

3 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,650 views48 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Красота в глазах Я имел честь, лицезреть ноутбук человека, который один из лучших в России по комп. графике. Стоимость часа его работы — тарифицируется, как крыло от Боинга. Он достал свой ноут, похожий на ноутбук из фильмов про хакеров, открыл его и стал показывать мне дорогущие технологии и, не менее дорогущий результат их работы. Впечатлил меня, нежданно, не увиденный мной контент, а заляпанный, в саннину, мон…

😁26❤9🤯7🔥5😢1

2 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTC≈1,700 views27 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

В тему очередного московского тумана «А еще, ежик думал о лошади: «Как она там, в тумане?» (с)

❤27

2 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,820 views25 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Про токсичные шутки У нас с друзьями и коллегами, в целом, используется такой юмор, что: где-то с подъебками, где-то с цинизмом, где-то с абсурдом и жесткими вещами. Со стороны, может показаться, что это крайняя токсичность, но на деле — безопасная зона для общения без фильтров. Так вот, меня тут спросил человек, который имел честь, побывать в нашей компании: «А вот вы не обижаетесь друг на друга, когда жестко под…

❤20👍5

23 Oct 2026, 06:44 UTC≈2,510 views37 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

У дорогой Сусанны @Alperina сегодня День рождения. Мы были знакомы, но, именно наши телеграм-каналы, сблизили нас и подружили. Имениннице желаю всего самого позитивного и светлого. Обнял.

❤34👎3

23 Oct 2026, 05:49 UTC≈2,360 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Вчера ТНТ провел свой «Новый сезон»

🔥7

20 Oct 2026, 06:21 UTC≈2,570 views59 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Регулярное утро наблюдаю, как девушки за рулем машины красятся. Сюжет очевиден: утро, опаздываю, поэтому, едем и макияжно догоняемся в пути. Губы/помада, ресницы/туш — это понятно. Но тут, стою на светофоре, поворачиваю голову, а там за рулем сидит девушка с большим количеством пятен на лице. Ну, разное бывает с кожей, посочувствовал, но она начинает размазывать пятна по лицу и еще добавляет из тюбика. Тоналка. Не…

😁37❤18🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @Film_hedgehog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Film_hedgehog edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Film_hedgehog as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTCAnonymous Poll633 voters

Мужики, а давайте реально проголосуем. Никто ж не знает, кто как проголосовал, зато поймем реальную картину. Вопрос для мужчин: боитесь ли вы свою женщину? (Не в ее гневе, а просто)

  1. Боюсь4%
  2. Не боюсь29%
  3. Сложно сказать… не знаю6%
  4. Я женщина и хочу посмотреть результат62%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КИОН
@kionru · 66,890
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
ШОУРАННЕР
@iamshowrunner · 50,550
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
КОЛОБОК
@kolobok_start · 19,883
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
Кино и кинобизнес
@kino_business · 27,584
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
улица балабанова
@ulizabalabanova · 23,233
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
супер8
@moviehorse · 25,038
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 September 2026
Кино-Театр.Ру🎭
@kino_teatrru · 26,139
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Иви | О кино, фильмах и сериалах
@official_iviru · 62,969
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Дима SuperVHS: мемы и кино
@supervhs · 27,852
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Закулиска
@zakuliska · 36,187
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
БЕЗРУКОВ
@sv_bezrukov · 56,761
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
РУССКОЕ КИНО В ТОПЕ
@rkvt_2020 · 34,395
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Сергей Бурунов • Официальный канал
@sergeyburunovofficial · 62,321
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Okko Кино
@okkomovies · 115,540
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 124,271
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Культовые русские сериалы
@KingOfYantar · 35,917
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
Кот Х.П.
@Kothueplet · 19,935
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
Исакова
@VikaIsakova1210 · 22,886
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Новости кинопроизводства
@filmres · 37,629
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Кинопоиск | Индустрия
@kinopoisk_Industry · 28,543
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
кино про тебя
@kinoprotebya · 39,797
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
Некинокритик 🎬
@ne_kinokritik · 48,094
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
KinoReel
@kinoreel · 50,636
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
БК медиа
@kinometro · 32,936
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кино_Ёж” (@Film_hedgehog), 10,264 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Film_hedgehog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.