продолжает меня доводить, спорить и делать по-своему. я бы пожаловалась на характер, но слишком хорошо знаю, от кого он достался. 14 😈 маленькая причина больших доз валерьянки
❤54❤🔥10🔥6💘4🥰1

Channel
@mirohina_a
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,779subscribers
+89 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001445206443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mirohina_a |
| Description | сценарист режиссер Мать Too Me Production Всегда. Ввязывайтесь. В истории.📖 Legio Felix 2018-2023 Legio Augusta 2020-2023 Руководитель III творческого объединения @tv_ctc 2023-2025 drama queen by PREMIER 2025-2026 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mirohina_a |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:57 | 11,779 | -3 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:37 | 11,782 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:30 | 11,786 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:08 | 11,789 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:55 | 11,787 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:01 | 11,786 | -12 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 11,798 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:01 | 11,800 | +3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 11,797 | +7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:46 | 11,790 | +3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 11,787 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 11,784 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:44 | 11,788 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 11,787 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:48 | 11,789 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:09 | 11,793 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:08 | 11,792 | -7 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 11,799 | +7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 11,792 | -5 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 11,797 | first reading |
66 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (29 July 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 30,065 |
| Reactions total | 1,563 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 20:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,116 reactions across 65 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,345 | 38.3% | |
| 😁 | 1,091 | 17.8% | |
| 🔥 | 764 | 12.5% | |
| 🤣 | 467 | 7.64% | |
| ❤🔥 | 339 | 5.54% | |
| 👍 | 248 | 4.05% | |
| 🥰 | 184 | 3.01% | |
| 💯 | 121 | 1.98% | |
| 👏 | 107 | 1.75% | |
| ⚡ | 63 | 1.03% | |
| 🙏 | 60 | 0.981% | |
| 💔 | 53 | 0.867% | |
| 🐳 | 37 | 0.605% | |
| 😱 | 30 | 0.491% | |
| 🍓 | 27 | 0.441% | |
| 💘 | 26 | 0.425% | |
| 😢 | 19 | 0.311% | |
| 👀 | 16 | 0.262% | |
| 💩 | 16 | 0.262% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 0.18% | |
| 23 further kinds | 92 | 1.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (56.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
продолжает меня доводить, спорить и делать по-своему. я бы пожаловалась на характер, но слишком хорошо знаю, от кого он достался. 14 😈 маленькая причина больших доз валерьянки
❤54❤🔥10🔥6💘4🥰1
зашла вам сказать следующее: «полураспад» - нужно пережить серию 3 и в целом, если вам нравится кино, где много нагнетают, рефлексируют, но сюжет топчется на месте и никак не прорвется - можете смотреть. из минусов - с первой серии понятно, что никакой отец нади не злодей, более того, я даже знала каким образом он погонет их из деревни - шаг настолько предсказуемый, что ты просто ждешь - ну когда уже. крутым поворот…
🔥28❤22❤🔥15😁11👍6🍓2💯2🐳1
я нашла себе нишевое хобби для кризиса среднего возраста: фланкировка казачьей шашкой что хочется сказать: давайте, вызывайте меня на очные встречи и рассказывайте ваши правки
😁34🔥20❤7👍6🐳2🥰1
ну ещё из новостей, если кто-то пропустил человек, чьи правки я слушаю с удовольствием, даже если моё лицо этого не показывает, готов давать правки и вам всем студентам моей несуществующей мастерской советую даже не советую, а настаиваю https://t.me/films74/1134
❤15🔥12
после убойного сценарного запоя зашла в интернеты узнать че как вообще а тут, значит, все волнуются из-за того, что сережка и андрюшка расстались люди спорят, обсуждают, собираются в сообщества парни выдали такую мелодраматическую базу, что мы с вами со своими хай концептами в каком-то жестком подсосе сидим давно людей ничего так не будоражило, кто бы мог подумать, что мир будет так переживать из-за любви двух русски…
😁48🤪8❤7❤🔥3🦄3💘2💊1
обожаю эти мои рабочие #диалоги - тебя будет вычитывать наш креативный….да ну что ты так смотришь, я ещё не объяснил! - да со всеми я прекрасно срабатываюсь - хотят они этого или нет - я очень рад, что ты с нами - погоди, давай сначала напишем и не подеремся
🔥23❤17👍8😁3🥰1
октябрь в картинках, понятных только мне осознала, что прошел месяц, только потому что варвара спросила забронировала ли я ей лофт на день рождения, а я точно помню, что он в ноябре но! - так много всего написано за эти тридцать дней. разбитое сердце всегда мощный мотор. - мне нравится, как в нашем режиссерском чате мы все пытаемся друг друга полюбить и не убить. иногда в пределах одного сообщения😎 - как же важно при…
❤49🔥23💘4🥰3🤝2
ваша вернулась, хоть вы и не ждали поговорим о Бене Крике точнее, о двух наших попытках создать фантастические миры по мотивам произведений стругацких: «трудно быть богом» и «полдень». хочется сказать: я лично не большой любитель фантастики. но всё равно посмотрела оба сериала от начала до конца, потому что у меня есть индустриальная миссия. ну и что, что никто мне эту миссию не назначал. я и сама умею😎 (так же отм…
❤57💯20🔥11👏6👍3🥰1😨1
я готова поверить в другую планету. но сначала дайте мне поверить хотя бы в одного её жителя. при всём вышесказанном мне нравится, что мы вообще туда полезли. что у нас есть смелость заходить на территории, где ещё не всё умеем, не всё получается и есть риск облажаться. я не хочу, чтобы выводом из этих попыток стало: «ну вот не надо было» надо было! и ещё надо! и я надеюсь, что найдутся те, кто еще туда пойдет. сло…
❤65👍15🥰9🔥5💘1🤯1
«ты точно умеешь танцевать» ©️вино
❤46🤣27🥰8👏5💘2⚡1
закончим эту неделю стартом проекта «укрощение мрачной и строптивой» никогда не понимала, почему желающих перевоспитать меня больше, чем желающих оставить в покое 🙄 боженька, спасибо, что в моей жизни есть СтасОлегыч, который ржет, но всегда говорит, что любит меня ровно в этом виде и я не комплексую из-за некоторых черт своего характера ещё на этой неделе я несколько раз промолчала никто не оценил, потому что никт…
❤67❤🔥28💔26🙏18💯5👍4⚡3🥰3
алиса михална и её уроки жизни для матери «человек должен иметь особенность - развиваться, если у него такой особенности нет - это очень грустно» «интеллект должен присутствовать. необязательно постоянно, но в принятии решений хотелось бы» «мало иметь своё мнение. желательно ещё иметь что-то, чем ты его составил» знаете ли вы, что есть приложение кофейни, где ты можешь написать в чат ии кофе с каким вайбом ты хоч…
❤70😁32🔥15⚡4👏4😢3🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @mirohina_a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@mirohina_a edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“диагноз: мирохина” (@mirohina_a), 11,779 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mirohina_a.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.