Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for beng!

Channel

beng!

@mdmbeng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,054subscribers

+121 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001736249982
TypeChannel
Username@mdmbeng
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mdmbeng

Growth

13,93314,05413,993.57 August 2026 — 13,933 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,933 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,937 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,943 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,941 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,944 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,948 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,954 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,963 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,967 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,971 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,973 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,978 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,992 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,000 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,004 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,009 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,013 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,021 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,026 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,039 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,044 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,052 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,053 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,054 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 27 days, net +121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,915–14,072 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 12:1714,054+1
2 Sept 2026, 05:2714,053+1
1 Sept 2026, 02:3514,052+8
31 Aug 2026, 03:3514,044+5
30 Aug 2026, 02:2614,039+13
29 Aug 2026, 01:0814,026+5
28 Aug 2026, 02:3714,021+8
27 Aug 2026, 03:3814,013+4
24 Aug 2026, 23:4714,009+5
23 Aug 2026, 09:0214,004+4
21 Aug 2026, 22:1514,000+8
20 Aug 2026, 15:1113,992+14
19 Aug 2026, 16:3313,978+5
18 Aug 2026, 15:2813,973+2
17 Aug 2026, 13:2813,971+4
16 Aug 2026, 05:1713,967+4
14 Aug 2026, 18:1213,963+9
13 Aug 2026, 11:1413,954+6
12 Aug 2026, 12:5313,948+4
11 Aug 2026, 10:0213,944first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.3%
avg views ÷ 14,054 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,400
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.417%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held35 (22 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total65,940
Reactions total275
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

567 reactions across 33 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15627.5%
👍8915.7%
😱7012.3%
👎6110.8%
😁529.17%
💊407.05%
🎉234.06%
🤷‍♂183.17%
😭173.00%
🤣132.29%
👏111.94%
🖕101.76%
custom 607115959401552483730.529%
🙊20.353%
💯10.176%
🤬10.176%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 567 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 35 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mdmbeng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 12:58 UTC≈2,250 views9 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

#dtcpay #新加坡 💰dtcpay现已上线applepay 卡面喜加1 频道:@mdmbeng 投稿:@mdmbeng_Bot

😁9

1 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC≈2,210 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Alipayhk #香港 #支付宝 💰Alipay HK正式支援Apple Pay直接付款(无需认证)和一拍即付(需认证)🇭🇰 部分卡片不支持通过applepay付款(eea/部分U卡) dp 频道:@mdmbeng 投稿:@mdmbeng_Bot

12

27 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈4,560 views36 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#马来西亚 #手机卡 根据MCMC条例 马来西亚手机卡运营商U m obile需上传当地证明文件 否则会停用服务 不清楚其他运营商是否会同步此规则 频道:@mdmbeng 投稿:@mdmbeng_Bot

😱293🎉3👍1

26 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC≈4,680 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#AppleMap #地图 🍎苹果地图正式上线广告,现已在美国和加拿大逐步推送 苹果已正式开始在Apple地图中投放广告,并于近日启动美国和加拿大地区的逐步推送,未来几周覆盖范围还将进一步扩大。 目前广告主要出现在两个位置:用户尚未进行搜索时,“建议地点”区域可能出现广告;完成搜索后,相关搜索结果中也可能显示广告。 广告整体外观与普通商家列表基本一致,但会通过一个蓝色“广告”标识进行区分。苹果此前已宣布将在今年夏季为Apple地图引入广告,此次上线意味着该计划正式落地。 在隐私方面,苹果表示将延续其隐私优先的广告策略。用户的位置数据以及其在地图中看到或互动的广告不会与Apple账户关联,个人数据会保留在用户设备上,不会被苹果收集或存储,也不会与第三方共享。 目前苹果尚未公布这一广告功能何时扩展至美国和加拿大以外的市场。 频道:@mdmbeng 投稿:@mdmbeng_Bot

👎32🖕82🤬1

26 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC≈4,010 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#iOS27 🍎iOS 27预计9月中旬正式发布,或于9月14日上线 苹果下一代iPhone操作系统iOS 27预计将在今年9月正式向所有用户推送,目前该系统已经历整个夏季的测试阶段。 按照苹果近年来的发布规律,iOS重大版本通常会在9月推出。过去几代系统分别于9月12日至18日发布,因此目前预计iOS 27可能在9月14日(星期一)左右正式上线。 苹果通常会在秋季iPhone发布会期间公布新系统的确切发布日期。今年的新品发布会预计在9月9日前后举行,届时或将公布iOS 27的最终推送时间。 iOS 27将为钱包、照片、信息和备忘录等应用带来新功能,同时升级CarPlay和AirPods,并重点改进Siri人工智能能力。该系统预计将兼容所有支持iOS 26的iPhone机型。 频道:@mdmbeng 投稿:@mdmbeng_Bot

5👍1

23 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC≈4,560 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#RiaMoney #汇款工具 #薅羊毛 Ria money汇款100aud -30aud(145RMB) 1️⃣注册:au地址+au节点+全球手机号 2️⃣步骤:Apple Pay(au卡)付款100aud至uk/菲律宾或其他国家个人账户(hsbc au/wise au卡/其他澳大利亚卡) 3️⃣付款时需CN护照kyc 正常按流程走即可 ✅折扣码 YRXP-3U5Y (汇100aud-30aud) 网站: https://www.riamoneytransfer.com/en-au/ App Store: https://apps.apple.com/app/id1065921908 频道:@mdmbeng 联系:@mdmstore

5👍1

20 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈5,490 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Gemini #Google 🐂Google学生福利畅享AI Pro一年又来了 验证学生(sheer id)即可享受12个月的Google AI Pro https://one.google.com/ai-student 频道:@mdmbeng 投稿:@mdmbeng_Bot

👍20😁7

20 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC≈5,140 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Apple #发布会 🍎苹果即将推出10款以上新品,9月秋季发布会或成年度最大新品盛宴 苹果即将迎来一年中最重要的新品发布季,预计公司将在9月举行秋季特别活动,具体日期可能于下周公布。届时,多款新产品有望集中亮相。 目前最确定的新品包括iPhone 18 Pro、iPhone 18 Pro Max、iPhone Ultra,以及Apple Watch Series 12和Apple Watch Ultra 4。此外,苹果还可能推出配备红外摄像头的新款AirPods,传闻其可能被命名为AirPods Pro 4。 在智能家居产品方面,苹果据称也准备了多项更新,包括新款Apple TV 4K、HomePad、HomePod mini 2和HomePod 3,最早可能于下个月发布。 除此之外,苹果还有可能推出搭载OLED屏幕的iPad mini、新款家庭安防摄像头以及新Mac产品。不过,后者更可能在10月的发布活动中登场。

10👍2

20 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC≈4,410 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#OKX DE #欧易 💰OKX DE推出订阅及支付返现活动,最高可享50%返现💰 订阅返现活动针对Netflix、ChatGPT和Claude平台,符合条件的订阅交易可享受50%消费返现,累计奖励上限为12 USDC。交易完成并结算后,奖励将发放至用户的OKX Pay钱包余额。 此外,欧易支付卡还推出消费返现活动。除非欧元消费最高返现300欧活动外,使用USDG通过欧易支付卡进行符合条件的购物,可获得2%返现,最高返现额度可提升至20欧元,返现将在交易结算后计入OKX Pay余额。 频道:@mdmbeng 投稿:@mdmbeng_Bot

😁3

16 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC≈5,380 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Kark us #kraken #海妖 🏦kraken us 现已上线visa卡💳 与kraken uk一致,享有2%返现 us卡头:44662378(visa) uk卡头:53211342(master) 频道:@mdmbeng 投稿:@mdmbeng_Bot

5

16 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC≈5,320 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#GoogleDrive #土耳其 #涨价 🍎Google Drive 2TB 土耳其区iOS订阅涨价,月费上涨约75.6%🇹🇷 苹果宣布,Google Drive 的 Google AI Plus(2TB)订阅价格(土耳其区)将于2026年9月12日起上涨。 该订阅目前月费为204.99土耳其里拉,调整后将涨至359.99土耳其里拉,涨幅约75.6%。新价格将持续适用于现有订阅,直至用户取消订阅。 频道:@mdmbeng 投稿:@mdmbeng_Bot

😱15🎉8💊5👎4👍2

15 Aug 2026, 01:51 UTC≈4,900 views29 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#隐形水印 #claude 🤖Claude开始给AI文字加隐形水印 Anthropic近日宣布,Claude已开始在生成的文字中加入肉眼不可见、机器可识别的水印。该标记直接嵌入文字生成过程,即使复制、粘贴或进行轻度修改,仍可能保留;大幅改写、翻译等操作则可能使其失效。 据报道,这项功能从2026年8月2日之后发布的Claude模型开始启用,并逐步覆盖现有模型。Anthropic表示,水印不会改变文字的含义、质量或可读性,主要用于判断内容是否经过Claude处理,而不等同于证明内容完全由AI创作。 此举主要与欧盟《AI法案》关于AI生成内容透明度的要求有关。Anthropic还计划推出检测工具,让用户和第三方能够识别Claude文本中的水印。 这一消息也引发部分用户担忧,尤其是写作、教育和出版领域。有用户认为,即使只是让Claude进行润色或修改,文本也可能被标记为经过AI处理,从而引发作者归属和使用场景方面的争议。 频

👎23🤣42

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @mdmbeng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“beng!” (@mdmbeng), 14,054 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mdmbeng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.