27 measurements spanning 34 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,843–11,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 05:20
11,859
-16
6 Sept 2026, 20:20
11,875
-12
4 Sept 2026, 05:01
11,887
-10
2 Sept 2026, 15:38
11,897
-11
1 Sept 2026, 11:48
11,908
-15
31 Aug 2026, 10:45
11,923
-4
30 Aug 2026, 11:54
11,927
-5
29 Aug 2026, 08:34
11,932
-4
28 Aug 2026, 04:58
11,936
+1
27 Aug 2026, 06:23
11,935
-1
26 Aug 2026, 07:38
11,936
-3
25 Aug 2026, 08:04
11,939
-5
24 Aug 2026, 10:08
11,944
-8
22 Aug 2026, 16:13
11,952
-10
21 Aug 2026, 03:34
11,962
+2
18 Aug 2026, 21:12
11,960
+7
17 Aug 2026, 19:05
11,953
-2
16 Aug 2026, 14:44
11,955
-4
15 Aug 2026, 01:07
11,959
-5
13 Aug 2026, 17:56
11,964
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.5%
avg views ÷ 11,859 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,680
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
31 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
88,900
Reactions total
6,062
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 06s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,489 reactions across 31 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,637
66.5%
custom 5404325385410218522
1,325
11.5%
custom 5438485944669853487
1,216
10.6%
custom 5314344566428560914
677
5.89%
custom 5206509757375999961
292
2.54%
custom 5246880165035794769
190
1.65%
custom 5443137020589275467
121
1.05%
custom 5188646949737223252
16
0.139%
custom 5409261239136178250
15
0.131%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,489 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.23%
1 of 31 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,420
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,360
over 30 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJPyDCM
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Каждый раз открываю раздел с детскими вещами и девайсами и поражаюсь, сколько сейчас всего классного, красивого и удобного при этом!🧸🤎
Это одна из самых прикольных частей моего первого месяца материнства для меня, я не покупала много всего «до», потому что не была уверена, что пригодится, зато сейчас отрываюсь..
Мы вот так до озон ходили за очередными покупками, как видите, человеку понравилось)
Попался на глаза показ Fendi Couture Fall 2016, площадкой для которого Карл Лагерфельд выбрал фонтан Треви в Риме
Масштаб объясняется юбилеем, в тот год бренд существовал 90 лет под этим именем
Кстати, рядом с Карлом Сильвия Вентурини Фенди - наследница основателей модного дома Fendi
Какая красота ⛲️
Один из самых частых советов, которые мне давали «на будущее» пока я была беременна - спи пока ребенок спит
Что-что, но эту привычку мне ввести так и не удалось. Я попробовала ложиться с ним в дневные сны, в итоге - я не успевала уснуть/выспаться, а ещё не успевала поесть или сделать какие-либо дела, потому что он просыпался и все моё внимание конечно уже там☁️
Но вот спать утром и вечером доп сон пока с ним Вова - …
Очень нравятся эти коллажи в последние дни месяца, давайте делиться яркими моментами за последний месяц лета в комментариях?) можно по одной фотке или кидайте целую пачку, не сдерживайтесь, очень интересно посмотреть
У меня конечно этот август стал одним из самых важных месяцев получается за всю жизнь вообще🤍
Не знаю как у вас, но у меня абсолютно каждое утро начинается с чашки кофе, мы не так давно купили кофе машину с зернами, но вот какие зерна покупать к ней - вопрос долго был открытый ☕️
Пошла по неочевидному, но логичному пути - стала подсматривать, какие зерна используют в кофейнях, где мне нравится кофе. Так я нашла зерна от Tasty Coffee (это поставщик кофе для кофеен, который можно заказать домой)
Очень понравил…
Я вчера доехала до мероприятия в Кофеманию bez tarelok и попробовала их голубую матчу в коллаборации с брендом Стеши Маликовой Dress by Stesha☁️
Вкусно, сладенько и я удивлена, но как-то сделали всего 180 ккал на этот стаканчик 🍵
Бессонные мамские будни ☁️
По кусочкам собираю дофаминовые моменты в свой день, чтобы разбавлять рутину
Утром хожу до кофейни с коляской, иногда и завтракаю там.
А ещё, я же теперь официально могу есть сладкое, не переживая, что ребенок в животе ещё подрастет) Заказала себе по этому случаю натуральный бельгийский шоколад Leonidas, доставляют напрямую самолетом из Бельгии в Россию, он даже приходит в термопакете. Взя…
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @messmess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TERLETSKAYA LIVE @terletskayalive · 37,099 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yulia Mess” (@messmess), 11,859 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/messmess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
